In many jurisdictions,
drivers convicted for the first-time of driving while impaired by alcohol
undertake a risk assessment that will determine the severity of sanctions and
the remedial measures they must follow as requisites for re-licensing. There is
uncertainty inherent in the assessment of risk for recidivism, however, many
offenders feel unfairly assessed and discommoded by the decision-making process
and its consequences.
The objective of this qualitative study was to gain
insight into the perspectives of offenders regarding re-licensing decision
making and sanctioning. Specifically, in focus groups first-time offenders and
recidivists were probed as to whether they favoured erring on the side of road
safety in decision making, with its consequent greater risk of false positive
assessments, or erring on the side of maintaining driving privileges, with its
consequent greater risk of false negative assessments.
In general, participants
preferred a higher probability of false negative vs. false positive
assessments. Most cited the consequences of sanctions and remedial measures as
too severe to impose them on potentially low-risk drivers, as the assessment
and monitoring protocols' limitations could lead to non-equitable treatment. At
the same time, recidivists evoked a greater preference for a higher probability
of false positive assessments compared to first-time offenders, as they believed
that recidivism was more likely to follow a first conviction than did
first-time offenders.
This information can be useful for a more comprehensive
and societally coherent exercise of DWI prevention policies.
Purchase full article at: http://goo.gl/EB0RiC
- 1Department de Psychologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
- 2Traffic Injury Research Foundation, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
- 3Research Centre of the Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, Québec, Canada.
- 4Research Centre of the Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, Québec, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada; Foster Addiction Rehabilitation Centre, St. Philippe de Laprairie, Québec, Canada. Electronic address: thomas.brown@mcgill.ca.
More at: https://twitter.com/hiv_insight
No comments:
Post a Comment