Viral load is still the marker of choice for monitoring
adherence to combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) and confirming the success
of HIV treatment. Unfortunately it is difficult to access in many resource-poor
settings. We aimed to measure the performance of caregiver reporting adherence
for detecting virological failure in routine practice during the first
2 years after cART initiation in infants.
PEDIACAM is an ongoing prospective cohort study including HIV1-infected
infants diagnosed before 7 months of age between November 2007 and October
2011 in Cameroon. Adherence was assessed using a questionnaire administered
every 3 months from cART initiation; the HIV-RNA viral load was determined
at the same visits. Virological failure was defined as having a viral load ≥ 1000
cp/mL at 3 and 12 months
after cART initiation or having a viral load ≥ 400
cp/mL at 24 months after
cART initiation. The performance of each current missed and cumulative missed
dose defined according to adherence as reported by caregiver was assessed using
the viral load as the gold standard.
cART was initiated at a median age of 4 months (IQR:
3–6) in the 167 infants included. The cumulative missed dose showed the best
overall performance for detecting virological failure after 12 months of
cART (AUC test, p = 0.005, LR + =4.4
and LR− = 0.4).
Whatever the adherence reporting criterion, the negative predictive value was
high (NPV ≥ 75 %) 12 and 24 months after cART initiation,
whereas the positive predictive value was low (PPV ≤ 50 %).
The adherence questionnaire administered by the health care
provider to the infants’ caregivers is not reliable for detecting virological
failure in routine practice: its positive predictive value is low. However, the
cumulative missed dose measurement may be a reliable predictor of virological
success, particularly after 12 months of cART, given its high negative
predictive value.
Below: ROC curve for various reporting adherence criteria (ANRS-PEDIACAM Study, 2008-2013, Cameroon). Legend: cART, combined antiretroviral therapy
1Université Paris-Sud; Centre Mère et Enfant de la Fondation Chantal Biya, Yaounde, Cameroon
2Université Paris-Sud; Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, CESP INSERM U1018, team 4 “HIV and STD”; Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94276, France
3SESSTIM (UMR 912) Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
4Centre Pasteur du Cameroun, Service d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Yaounde, Cameroon
5Université Douala; Hôpital Laquintinie, Douala, POB 4035, Cameroon
6Centre Hospitalier d’Essos, Yaounde, Cameroon
7Centre Mère et Enfant de la Fondation Chantal Biya, Yaounde, Cameroon
8Université Yaoundé I; Centre Pasteur du Cameroun, Service d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Yaounde, Cameroon
9Centre Pasteur du Cameroun, Service de Virologie, Yaounde, Cameroon
10Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité; Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Pédiatrie Générale, Hôpital Robert Debré, Paris, France
11UMI 233, IRD, Université Montpellier, Montpellier, 34394, France
No comments:
Post a Comment