Showing posts with label Victimization. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Victimization. Show all posts

Sunday, May 15, 2016

Correlates of Sexual Violence among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Tijuana, Mexico

Sexual violence among men who have sex with men (MSM) is prevalent in developing countries and is associated with increased HIV/STI risk. Despite high HIV prevalence (20 %) among MSM in Tijuana, Mexico, little attention has been paid to the occurrence of sexual violence in this high-risk group. 

The present study used a syndemic conditions framework to examine correlates of sexual violence victimization in a sample of 201 MSM surveyed in Tijuana, Mexico during 2012 and 2013. Participants were recruited through respondent-driven sampling and underwent a 2-h baseline interview and testing for HIV and syphilis. Sexual violence was defined as any incident during the past year in which the participant had been raped, sexually molested, or sexually harassed. 

The majority of participants self-identified as gay or bisexual, had never married, were employed, and had a high school education or greater. The average age was 29.7 years. Thirty-nine percent reported sexual violence in the past year. A hierarchical multiple linear regression model predicting more experiences of sexual violence was tested. In a final model, a higher number of experiences of sexual violence was associated with a history of childhood sexual abuse, more adult experiences of homophobia, more depression and hostility symptoms, and not living with a spouse or steady partner. 

The findings from this study support a model of co-occurring psychosocial factors that increase the likelihood of sexual violence experiences among MSM. Multi-level approaches to the prevention of childhood and adult experiences of sexual violence and homophobia are needed to avert the development of adverse mental and physical health outcomes associated with sexual violence victimization.

Purchase full article at:   http://goo.gl/Oj9nkp

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, Mail Code 0680, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0680, USA.
  • 2Division of Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  • 3Department of Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
  • 4US-Mexico Border Health Commission, Tijuana, Mexico.
  • 5Agencia Familiar Binacional, A.C., Tijuana, Mexico.
  • 6Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, Mail Code 0680, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0680, USA. tpatterson@ucsd.edu. 
  •  2016 May 13. 


Sunday, April 3, 2016

Risk of Heavy Drinking among Sexual Minority Adolescents: Indirect Pathways through Sexual Orientation-Related Victimization & Affiliation with Substance-Using Peers

AIMS:
To test two indirect pathways through which sexual minority adolescents (SMAs) may be at risk for heavy episodic drinking (HED) including a socialization pathway via substance-using peer affiliations and social marginalization pathway via sexual minority-specific victimization and subsequent substance-using peer affiliations.

DESIGN:
Analysis of the first three waves (six-months apart) of a longitudinal adolescent health risk study (2011-2014). Participants were referred by medical providers or a screening system in providers' waiting rooms.

SETTING:
Two large urban adolescent health clinics in Pennsylvania and Ohio, USA.

PARTICIPANTS:
290 adolescents (ages 14-19, mean: 17) who were 71% female, 33% non-Hispanic White, and 34% SMAs.

MEASUREMENTS:
Self-reported sexual minority status (wave 1) and affiliation with substance-using peers (waves 1 and 2), and latent sexual-minority specific victimization (waves 1 and 2) and HED (waves 1 and 3) variables.

FINDINGS:
Using mediation analyses in a structural equation modeling framework, there was a significant indirect effect of sexual minority status (wave 1) on HED (wave 3) via affiliation with substance-using peers (wave 2; indirect effect = 0.03, 95%CI: 0.01, 0.07), after accounting for the indirect effect of sexual-orientation related victimization (wave 2; indirect effect = .10, 95%CI: 0.02-0.19). The social marginalization pathway was not supported as victimization (wave 1) was not associated with affiliation with substance-using peers (wave 2; β = -.04, p = .66). Sex differences in the indirect effects were not detected (ps > .10).

CONCLUSIONS:
Sexual minority adolescents in the US appear to exhibit increased heavy episodic drinking via an indirect socialization pathway including affiliations with substance-using peers and a concurrent indirect pathway involving sexual minority-related victimization. The pathways appear to operate similarly for boys and girls.

Purchase full article at:   http://goo.gl/n3m99C

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh.
  • 2Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh.
  • 3Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh.
  • 4Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University and Nationwide Children's Hospital. 
  •  2016 Mar 28. doi: 10.1111/add.13409. 



Thursday, March 31, 2016

The Roles of Family Factors and Relationship Dynamics on Dating Violence Victimization and Perpetration among College Men and Women in Emerging Adulthood

Using data from the International Dating Violence Study, this study examined the roles of early socialization, family social structure, and relationship dynamics factors on physical aggression in dating among U.S. college students in emerging adulthood. 

The interaction effects between these three domains of interest (early socialization, family social structure, and relationship dynamics) were explored to understand the underlying mechanisms that influenced victimization and perpetration in dating. 

In general, we found that family and relational variables associated with dating victimization and perpetration were fairly similar. Among the early socialization variables, experience of childhood neglect and having witnessed domestic violence were significantly related to victimization and perpetration. Living in a two-parent household appeared to exert a protective effect, although associations with parental education were not statistically significant. 

Furthermore, the participants were more likely to experience victimization or impose aggression in dating relationships which were characterized by conflicts, distress, dominance, or psychological aggression. Overall, for the participants who came from a two-parent household, dominance in dating was linked to less violence. 

When the participants faced higher levels of psychological aggression, adverse early socialization factors were associated with higher levels of dating violence victimization and perpetration. Research and practice implications were discussed.

Purchase full article at:   http://goo.gl/dIOGZO

By:  Paat YF1Markham C2.
  • 1The University of Texas at El Paso, USA ypaat@utep.edu.
  • 2University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, USA. 
  •  2016 Mar 27. pii: 0886260516640544



Lessons Learned: Conducting Research with Victims Portrayed in Sexual Abuse Images and Their Parents

Victims portrayed in sexual abuse images may be resistant to participate in research because of embarrassment or shame due to the sensitive nature and potential permanency of images. No studies we are aware of explore reactions to participating in research after this type of crime. 

Telephone interviews were conducted with convenience samples of parents (n= 46) and adolescents who were victims of child sexual abuse (n= 11; some of whom were portrayed in sexual abuse images), and online surveys were completed by adult survivors depicted in abuse images (N= 133). 
  • The first lesson was that few agencies tracked this type of crime. This lack of tracking raises the question as to what types of data should be collected and tracked as part of an investigation. 
  • The second lesson was that few victims at the two participating agencies had been portrayed in sexual abuse images (4%-5%). 
  • The third lesson was that once possible cases were identified, we found relatively high percentages of consent to contact and interview completions. 
    • This implies that researchers and service providers should not be hesitant about conducting research after an investigation of child sexual abuse. 
  • The fourth lesson was that the vast majority of participants reported not being upset by the questions. 
We hope that the data presented here will encourage agencies to reconsider the types of data being tracked and will encourage researchers to conduct in-depth research with populations that are often difficult to reach to continue improving the professional response to child victimization.

Purchase full article at:   http://goo.gl/qQnXAy

  • 1University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA Wendy.walsh@unh.edu.
  • 2University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA.
  • 3National Children's Alliance, Washington, DC, USA.
  • 4National Center for Victims of Crimes, Washington, DC, USA.
  • 5Kaiser Permanente, Portland, OR, USA.
  • 6The Harris County Children's Assessment Center, Houston, TX, USA. 
  •  2016 Mar 27. pii: 0886260516640545




Sunday, March 13, 2016

Victimization, Mental Health & Well-Being among Trans Youths in the Province of Quebec

Introduction 
Trans youths are more likely to experience negative social and parental reactions suggesting reprehension, from disapproving looks to physical violence. While victimization increases the likelihood of poor mental health outcomes, little is known about potential mediating factors between mental health and victimization. Self-esteem is one of the factors that may mediate the impact of homophobic victimization on mental health. Yet, data on trans youths are scarce.

Objectives 
The objectives of this paper are: 
  1. to compare trans youths to cisgender heterosexual male and female youths regarding two different forms of victimization (victimization based on gender nonconformity and parental verbal abuse), self-esteem, and psychological distress, as well as 
  2. to test a path model of the impact of these two forms of victimization on self-esteem and psychological distress.
Methods 
Data for this study are drawn from the Quebec Youths' Romantic Relationships survey. Data were collected among youth aged 14 to 22 years old recruited either in schools or online. Thirty-seven participants endorsed being trans or questioning their gender identity. They were paired to 74 cisgender heterosexual youths (37 male and 37 female) using propensity scores based on socio-demographic characteristics.

Results 
Results showed that verbal parental abuse and victimization based on gender nonconformity were more prevalent among trans participants. Parental verbal abuse and victimization based on gender nonconformity were both directly and negatively associated with self-esteem (explained variance: 36%). Sexual status explains 19.6% of the variance of parental victimization and 50.6% of the variance of victimization on the basis of gender nonconformity. A higher self-esteem was associated with decreased psychological distress (explained variance: 66.9%). Moreover, parental verbal abuse was also directly associated with higher psychological distress. Although there was no direct relationship between trans status and psychological distress and self-esteem, its total indirect effects on these two indicators of mental health and wellbeing status were significant (p-value < 0.001), suggesting that the impact of sexual status on them is mediated by the victimization.

Conclusion 
This study showed the high vulnerability of trans youths to poor mental health and wellbeing outcomes because of the victimization they experience. The results highlight the importance of preventing victimization based on sexual-minority status and to educate people, including parents, to sexual and gender diversity.

Purchase full article [Article in French] at: 

  • 1Département de psychologie, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières.
  • 2Département de sexologie, Université du Québec à Montréal.
  •  2015 Fall;40(3):77-92. 



Saturday, March 5, 2016

The Relationship between Sexual Victimization and Year in School in U.S. Colleges: Investigating the Parameters of the “Red Zone”

It is the conventional wisdom among some universities that the highest risk of sexual assault is in the first or possibly second year in school. While initially belief in this pattern was primarily based on anecdote, recently some attempts have been made to more systematically and quantitatively test the existence of a “red zone,” a time of heightened risk of sexual assault sometime near the beginning of a female student's time at the college. However, most of these studies have been conducted with relatively small convenience samples from single schools and have had conflicting results. 

Here, I test the red zone hypothesis using self-reported sexual victimization data with a large sample (16,000) drawn from 22 schools as part of the Online College Social Life Survey. To investigate the specific mechanisms responsible for the red zone, I separately test for the existence of a red zone for four different types of sexual victimizations: physically forced intercourse, attempted forced intercourse, unwanted intercourse when incapacitated, and unwanted intercourse due to verbal pressure. 

Within these categories, I separately address sexual victimization that occurred while hanging out and sexual victimization during a party. Prior literature has emphasized the role of parties in the increased risk of assault for freshman. While I find some evidence for this in the higher estimates for sexual victimization at a party, the freshman effect remains for other types of sexual victimizations, suggesting that the red zone is not easily attributable to a single mechanistic cause, but to more generalizable factors. With one exception, I find that the red zone does not extend into the sophomore year.

Raw Frequencies of Sexual Victimization by School.
SchoolForced, PartyAttempt Forced, PartyDFSA, PartyVerbal, PartyForced, Hang OutAttempted Forced, Hang OutDFSA, Hang OutVerbal, Hang Out
Stanford17223587
Indiana93923651048
Arizona6191067121019
Stony Brook41394616413
Ithaca41615844210
Evergreen00001200
Santa Barbara48115903730542263
U Mass4097622732602324
Ohio State19271841015920
Whitman41716558215
Foothill92224720201739
Harvard03000000
UIC111920612291023
Framingham912136721618
Radford23312224
Beloit06002525
Riverside3884526612
UPenn312431626
Washington39611212
Merced01112401
MTSU7795412213
Carroll03103425
Total182455334133162317134307
Note. DFSA = drug- and alcohol-facilitated sexual assault; UIC = University of Illinois at Chicago; MTSU = Middle Tennessee State University.

Frequencies of Sexual Victimization by Year.
FreshmanSophomoreJunior +Total
Forced, party05,5473,9306,47615,953
11182440182
%2.080.610.611.13
DFSA, party05,2973,8276,38215,506
13058069454
%5.442.051.072.84
Verbal, party05,4623,8726,40515,739
11866284332
%3.291.581.292.07
Attempt forced, party05,4693,8536,36915,691
1812626133
%1.460.670.410.84
Forced, hang out05,5763,9306,46915,975
1892447160
%1.570.610.720.99
Attempted forced, hang out05,4333,8446,36815,645
11696383315
%3.021.611.291.97
DFSA, hang out05,5913,9016,44515,937
1573344134
%1.010.840.680.83
Verbal, hang out05,4353,8066,27915,520
111573116304
%2.071.881.811.92
Note. DFSA = drug- and alcohol-facilitated sexual assault.

Full article at:   http://goo.gl/0kuiBf

1University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
Corresponding Author: Stephen Cranney, Population Studies Center, University of Pennsylvania, 239 McNeil Building, 3718 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19143, USA,  ude.nnepu.sas@yennarcs