Medication adherence is a major challenge in HIV treatment.
New mobile technologies such as smartphones facilitate the delivery of brief
tailored messages to promote adherence. However, the best approach for tailoring
messages is unknown. Persons living with HIV (PLWH) might be more receptive to
some messages than others based on their current psychological state.
We recruited 37 PLWH from a parent study of motivational
states and adherence. Participants completed smartphone-based surveys at a
random time every day for 2 weeks, then immediately received intervention or
control tailored messages, depending on random assignment. After 2 weeks in the
initial condition, participants received the other condition in a crossover
design. Intervention messages were tailored to match PLWH's current
psychological state based on five variables - control beliefs, mood, stress,
coping, and social support. Control messages were tailored to create a mismatch
between message framing and participants' current psychological state. We
evaluated intervention feasibility based on acceptance, ease of use, and
usefulness measures. We also used pilot randomized controlled trial methods to
test the intervention's effect on adherence, which was measured using
electronic caps that recorded pill-bottle openings.
Acceptance was high based on 76% enrollment and 85%
satisfaction. Participants found the hardware and software easy to use.
However, attrition was high at 59%, and usefulness ratings were slightly lower.
The most common complaint was boredom. Unexpectedly, there was no difference
between mismatched and matched messages' effects, but each group showed a
10%-15% improvement in adherence after crossing to the opposite study condition.
Although smartphone-based tailored messaging was feasible
and participants had clinically meaningful improvements in adherence, the
mechanisms of change require further study. Possible explanations might include
novelty effects, increased receptiveness to new information after habituation,
or pseudotailoring, three ways in which attentional processes can affect
behavior.
Purchase full article
at: https://goo.gl/pK2OeI
By: Cook PF1, Carrington JM2, Schmiege SJ1, Starr W3, Reeder B1.
- 1University of Colorado College of Nursing, Aurora, CO, USA.
- 2University of Arizona College of Nursing, Tucson, AZ, USA.
- 3University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
More at: https://twitter.com/hiv_insight
No comments:
Post a Comment