Research on the processing of sexual stimuli has proved that such material has high priority in human cognition. Yet, although sex differences in response to sexual stimuli were extensively discussed in the literature, sexual orientation was given relatively little consideration, and material suitable for relevant research is difficult to come by. With this in mind, we present a collection of 200 erotic images, accompanied by their self-report ratings of emotional valence and arousal by homo- and heterosexual males and females (n= 80, divided into four equal-sized subsamples). The collection complements the Nencki Affective Picture System (NAPS) and is intended to be used as stimulus material in experimental research. The erotic images are divided into five categories, depending on their content: opposite-sex couple (50), male couple (50), female couple (50), male (25) and female (25). Additional 100 control images from the NAPS depicting people in a non-erotic context were also used in the study. We showed that recipient sex and sexual orientation strongly influenced the evaluation of erotic content. Thus, comparisons of valence and arousal ratings in different subject groups will help researchers select stimuli set for the purpose of various experimental designs. To facilitate the use of the dataset, we provide an on-line tool, which allows the user to browse the images interactively and select proper stimuli on the basis of several parameters. The NAPS ERO image collection together with the data are available to the scientific community for non-commercial use athttp://naps.nencki.gov.pl.
Below:
A sample image from each category. All images were obtained from Flickr and were published under a Creative Commons license. Credits (from left to right): Charles Roffey, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0; David Shankbone, CC BY 2.0; Georgie Pauwels, CC BY 2.0; Charles Roffey, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0; Lies Thru a Lens, CC BY 2.0. For license terms see: CC BY 2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/); CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/).
Full article
at: http://goo.gl/3pkTNw
By: Małgorzata Wierzba,1,* Monika Riegel,1 Anna Pucz,2 Zuzanna Leśniewska,2 Wojciech Ł. Dragan,2 Mateusz Gola,3,4Katarzyna Jednoróg,5 and Artur Marchewka1,*
1Laboratory of Brain Imaging, Neurobiology Centre, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Warsaw, Poland
2Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
3Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
4Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computations, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
5Laboratory of Psychophysiology, Department of Neurophysiology, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Warsaw, Poland
No comments:
Post a Comment