Friday, October 2, 2015

Gender-Equitable Attitudes, Bystander Behavior & Recent Abuse Perpetration Against Heterosexual Dating Partners of Male High School Athletes

We assessed the relationship between gender attitudes, identified as a critical component of violence prevention, and abuse toward dating partners among adolescent male athletes.

Our sample comprised 1699 athletes from 16 high schools in northern California who were surveyed between December 2009 and October 2010 in the larger Coaching Boys Into Men trial. We used logistic regression to assess the association between gender-equitable attitudes, bystander behavior, and recent abuse incidents.

Athletes with more gender-equitable attitudes and greater intention to intervene were less likely (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.28, 0.46; and AOR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.48, 0.75, respectively) and athletes who engaged in negative bystander behavior were more likely (AOR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.10, 1.35) to perpetrate abuse against their female dating partners.

Despite the shift among bystander intervention programs toward gender neutrality, our findings suggest a strong association between gender attitudes and dating violence. Programs designed for adolescents should include discussion of gender attitudes and target bystander behavior, because these components may operate on related but distinct pathways to reduce abuse.

TABLE 1—

Demographic Characteristics of Sample of Male High School Athletes and Recent Abuse Perpetration Toward Heterosexual Dating Partners: Coaching Boys Into Men Trial, California, 2009–2010
CharacteristicTotal (n=1699),a No. (%)Any Abuse, No. (%)bPPhysical–Sexual Abuse, No. (%)bPEmotional Abuse, No. (%)bP
Total sample276 (16.2)81 (4.8)243 (14.3)
Grade<.0010.62<.001
 9393 (23.1)46 (11.7)16 (4.1)35 (8.9)
 10429 (25.3)63 (14.7)23 (5.4)54 (12.6)
 11413 (24.3)62 (15.0)17 (4.1)57 (13.8)
 12446 (26.3)104 (23.3)25 (5.6)96 (21.5)
Race/ethnicity<.001<.001<.001
 White551 (32.4)60 (10.9)15 (2.7)52 (9.4)
 Non-Hispanic Black403 (23.7)108 (26.8)35 (8.7)96 (23.8)
 Hispanic339 (20.0)47 (13.9)16 (4.7)39 (11.5)
 Asian131 (7.7)15 (11.5)2 (1.5)14 (10.7)
 Native American/Pacific Islander84 (4.9)11 (13.1)3 (3.6)9 (10.7)
 Other172 (10.1)33 (19.2)9 (5.2)32 (18.6)
Parental education.92.6.89
 Some high school79 (4.7)13 (16.5)1 (1.3)12 (15.2)
 High school graduate300 (17.7)53 (17.7)15 (5.0)45 (15)
 Some college/technical school438 (25.8)74 (16.9)20 (4.6)67 (15.3)
 College graduate457 (26.9)67 (14.7)20 (4.4)60 (13.1)
 Completed graduate school236 (13.9)38 (16.1)13 (5.5)30 (12.7)
 Unknown189 (11.1)31 (16.4)12 (6.3)29 (15.3)
US-born.009.03.04
 Yes1551 (91.3)261 (16.8)80 (5.2)228 (14.7)
 No123 (7.2)10 (8.1)1 (0.8)10 (8.1)
Note. Abuse self-reported in past 3 months. P values determined by χ2 test. The sample size was n = 1699.
aPercentages may not equal 100% because of small amounts of missing data.
bRow percentage.

Full article at:  http://ht.ly/SXymd 

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA


No comments:

Post a Comment