Saturday, October 3, 2015

Substance Use and Hepatitis C: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study

The objective of this study was to assess craving and mood related to opioid and cocaine use among asymptomatic hepatitis C virus (HCV)+ and HCV− methadone patients who have not started antiviral treatment.

In this 28-week prospective ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study, 114 methadone-maintained, heroin- and cocaine-abusing individuals reported from the field in real time on their mood, craving, exposure to drug-use triggers, and drug use via handheld computers.

Sixty-one percent were HCV+; none were overtly symptomatic or receiving HCV treatment. HCV status was not associated with age, sex, race, or past-30-day or lifetime heroin or cocaine use. In event-contingent EMA entries, HCV+ individuals more often attributed use to having been bored, worried, or sad; feeling uncomfortable; or others being critical of them compared with HCV− participants. In randomly prompted EMA entries, HCV+ participants reported significantly more exposure to drug-use triggers, including handling ≥$10, seeing cocaine or heroin, seeing someone being offered/use cocaine or heroin, being tempted to use cocaine, and wanting to see what would happen if they used just a little cocaine or heroin.

HCV+ individuals experienced more negative moods and more often cited these negative moods as causes for drug use. HCV+ individuals reported greater exposure to environmental drug-use triggers, but they did not more frequently cite these as causes for drug use. The EMA data reported here suggest that HCV+ intravenous drug users may experience more labile mood and more reactivity to mood than HCV− intravenous drug users. The reason for the difference is not clear, but HCV status may be relevant to tailoring of treatment.

Table 1

Baseline Demographics and Drug-Use Characteristics by HCV Status (N = 114)
CategoryHCV+HCV−p
HCV status (n, %)69 (61%)45 (39%)
Age, years (M ± SD)41.5 ± 8.339.8 ± 7.7.28
Male (n, %)45 (65%)27 (60%).57
Non-Caucasian (n, %)40 (58%)32 (71%).16
Education (M ± SD)11.6 ± 1.512.1 ± 1.4.10
Net income, 30 days (M ± SD)$694 ± 1280$560 ± 813.53
Heroin use, years (M ± SD)13.7 ± 8.813.7 ± 8.2.63
Cocaine use, years (M ± SD)12.6 ± 9.010.0 ± 7.8.15
Other opiate use, 30 days (M ± SD)0.1 ± 0.40.8 ± 2.1.03
Money spent on drugs, 30 days (M ± SD)$2,074.30 ± 1,332.00$1,612.40 ± 1,001.90.04
Overdose (M ± SD)0.8 ± 2.10.1 ± 0.5.013
Route of administration of heroin (n, %)<.001
 Intranasal9 (13%)36 (80%)
 Intravenous60 (87%)9 (20%)
Route of administration of cocaine (n, %)<.001
 Intranasal1 (1%)8 (19%)
 Intravenous43 (62%)5 (11%)
 Smoking24 (35%)31 (55%)
Drinking to intoxication, 30 days (M ± SD)0.1 ± 0.80.5 ± 1.5.12
Current tobacco smoking (n, %)64 (93%)34 (76%)<.02
Note. HIV prevalence was very low in HCV+ and HCV− groups.

Table 3

Reason for Drug Use in Event-Contingent Entries and Exposure to Mood-Related Cues in Random-Prompt Entries by HCV Status (Adjusted for Education)
Mood TriggersEvent-Contingent Entries—It Happened Because …
Random-Prompt Entries—Within the Past Hour …
HCV+ (%, 95% CI)HCV− (%, 95% CI)F Value (df)pHCV+ (%, 95% CI)HCV− (%, 95% CI)F Value (df)p
Bored52% (46%, 57%)32% (26%, 39%)F (1, 83) = 16.62.000214% (13%, 15%)9% (8%, 9.4%)F (1, 111) = 67.5.002
Felt others critical23% (19%, 28%)12% (8%, 17%)F(1, 83) = 10.38.00411% (10%, 12%)4% (3.8%, 4.6%)F (1, 111) = 145,6.0002
Frustrated38% (33%, 44%)34% (27%, 41%)F (1, 83) = 0.96.3716% (15%, 17%)10% (9%, 11%)F (1, 111) = 81.1.0002
Sad32% (27%, 38%)21% (15%, 27%)F (1, 83) = 6.62.01813% (12%, 14%)7% (6%, 8%)F (1, 111) = 78.1.0002
Worried42% (36%, 48%)28% (21%, 35%)F (1, 83) = 8.48.00817% (16%, 18%)9% (8%, 10%)F (1, 111) = 112.0.0002
Uncomfortable24% (19%, 29%)12% (8%, 18%)F (1, 83) = 7.58.01211% (10%, 12%)10% (9%, 11%)F (1, 111) = 5.0.041
Good mood and felt like celebrating21% (17%, 26%)11% (7%, 16%)F (1, 83) = 8.71.0076% (5%, 7%)3% (2.7%, 4%)F (1, 111) = 49.8.002

Below:  Cravings for heroin, cocaine, and tobacco, reported in randomly prompted EMA entries, had higher intensities in HCV+ participants than in HCV− participants. Model-adjusted means and SEM are from linear mixed models (SAS Proc Mixed). Error bars indicate SEM. Response anchors were 0 = NO!, 1 = no??, 2 = yes??, 3 = YES!! * p < .05.



Below: Mood ratings in randomly prompted EMA reports were more negative in HCV+ participants than in HCV− participants. Details are the same as those for Figure 1.



Table 4

Exposure to Drug Cues by HCV Status in Random-Prompt Entries
Past-Hour Drug TriggerHCV+ (%, 95% CI)HCV− (%, 95% CI)F Value (df)p
Handled ≥$1041% (39%, 42%)29% (28%, 31%)F (1, 111) = 108.7.0002
Saw cocaine6% (6%, 7%)4% (3.2%, 4.1%)F (1, 111) = 54.51.0002
Saw heroin3% (3%, 4%)2% (2%, 3%)F (1, 111) = 8.99.006
Offered cocaine5% (5%, 6%)3% (2.8%, 3.6%)F (1, 111) = 43.83.0002
Offered heroin3% (2%, 3%)2% (1.7%, 2.4%)F (1, 111) = 6.21.021
Saw cocaine use2% (1%, 2%)0.4% (0.3%, 0.5%)F (1, 111) = 60.78.0002
Saw heroin use1% (0.9%, 1.3%)0.3% (0.2%, 0.4%)F (1, 111) = 38.17.002
Tempted cocaine8% (7.8%, 9.1%)7% (6%, 8%)F (1, 111) = 7.42.012
Tempted heroin4% (3.8%, 4.8%)4% (3.2%, 4.2%)F (1, 111) = 2.82.12
Wanted see happen cocaine6% (5.8%, 6.9%)4% (3.3%, 4.4%)F (1, 111) = 38.14.0002
Wanted to see happen heroin3% (2.8%, 3.6%)2.5% (2%, 3%)F (1, 111) = 4.02.065

Full article at: http://goo.gl/fUB7YJ

National Institute on Drug Abuse, Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland



No comments:

Post a Comment