Appropriate antibiotic use in patients with complicated
urinary tract infections can be measured by a valid set of nine quality
indicators (QIs). We evaluated the performance of these QIs in a national setting
and investigated which determinants influenced appropriate antibiotic use. For
the latter, we distinguished patient, department and hospital characteristics,
including organizational interventions aimed at improving the quality of
antibiotic use (antibiotic stewardship elements).
A retrospective, observational multicentre study included
1964 patients (58 % male sex) with a complicated urinary tract infection
treated at Internal Medicine and Urology departments of 19 Dutch university and
non-university hospitals. Data of 50 patients per department were extracted
from medical charts. QI performance scores were calculated using previously
constructed algorithms. Department and hospital characteristics were collected
using questionnaires filled in by an internal medicine physician and an
urologist. Regression analysis was performed to identify determinants of QI
performance. Clustering at department and hospital level was taken into account
through inclusion of random effects in a multi-level model.
Median QI performance of departments varied between 31 %
(‘Treat urinary tract infection in men according to local guideline’) and 77 %
(‘Perform urine culture’). The patient characteristics non-febrile urinary
tract infection, female sex and presence of a urinary catheter were negatively
associated with performance on many QIs. The presence of an infectious diseases
physician and an antibiotic formulary were positively associated with
‘Prescribe empirical therapy according to guideline’. No other department or
hospital characteristics, including stewardship elements, were consistently
associated with better QI performance.
A large inter-department variation was demonstrated in the
appropriateness of antibiotic use. In particular certain patient
characteristics (more than department or hospital characteristics) influenced
the quality of antibiotic use. Some, but not all antibiotic stewardship
elements did translate into better QI performance.
Below: Department performance scores on the QIs. Box-percentiles plots show the proportional distribution. Departments are indicated by vertical black lines ( | ). The box contains 90 percent of all departments. The median and the 30th and 70th percentiles are marked with a vertical blue line
Full article at: http://goo.gl/G1oV8Z
By: V. Spoorenberg1*, S. E. Geerlings1, R. B. Geskus2, T. M. de Reijke3, J. M. Prins1 and M. E. J. L. Hulscher4*
1Department of Internal Medicine, Division
of Infectious Diseases, Centre for Infection and Immunity Amsterdam, Academic
Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2Department of Clinical Epidemiology,
Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The
Netherlands
3Department of Urology, Academic Medical
Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
4Scientific Institute for Quality of
Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The
Netherlands
More at: https://twitter.com/hiv_insight
No comments:
Post a Comment