Sexual thoughts are
sufficient to increase testosterone (T) in women, yet erotic films are not. A
key confound in past studies is autonomy in stimulus selection: women choose
the content of their sexual thoughts but films have been selected by
researchers. We hypothesized that self-chosen erotic films, compared to
researcher-chosen erotic films, would (1) increase women's self-reported
arousal, enjoyment, and identification with stimuli, and decrease negative
affect; and (2) increase T.
Participants (N = 116 women) were
randomly assigned to a neutral documentary condition or one of three erotic
film conditions: high choice (self-chosen erotica from participants' own
sources), moderate choice (self-chosen erotica from films preselected by
sexuality researchers), or no choice (researcher-chosen erotica). Participants
provided saliva samples for T before and after viewing the film in the privacy
of their homes.
Compared to researcher-chosen erotica, self-chosen erotica
increased self-reported arousal and enjoyment, but also unexpectedly disgust,
guilt, and embarrassment. Self-chosen erotica only marginally increased
identification with stimuli compared to researcher-chosen erotica. Overall,
film condition did not affect T, but individual differences in identification
moderated T responses: among women reporting lower levels of identification,
the moderate choice condition decreased T compared to the no choice condition,
but this difference was not observed among women with higher identification.
These results highlight the importance of cognitive/emotional factors like
identification for sexually modulated T. However, self-chosen erotica results
in more ambivalent rather than unequivocally positive cognitive/emotional
responses, perhaps because stigma associated with viewing erotica for women
becomes more salient when choosing stimuli.
Purchase full article at: http://goo.gl/uEJWL1
By: Goldey KL1, van Anders SM2.
- 1Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
- 2Departments of Psychology and Women's Studies; Programs in Neuroscience and Reproductive Sciences; Science, Technology, and Society Program; Biosocial Methods Collaborative, University of Michigan, 530 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. smva@umich.edu.
More at: https://twitter.com/hiv_insight
No comments:
Post a Comment