Clustered structure of social
networks provides the chances of repeated exposures to carriers with similar
information. It is commonly believed that the impact of repeated exposures on
the spreading of information is nontrivial. Does this effect increase the
probability that an individual forwards a message in social networks? If so, to
what extent does this effect influence people’s decisions on whether or not to
spread information? Based on a large-scale microblogging data set, which logs
the message spreading processes and users’ forwarding activities, we conduct a
data-driven analysis to explore the answer to the above questions.
The results
show that an overwhelming majority of message samples are more probable to be
forwarded under repeated exposures, compared to those under only a single
exposure. For those message samples that cover various topics, we observe a
relatively fixed, topic-independent multiplier of the willingness of spreading
when repeated exposures occur, regardless of the differences in network
structure. We believe that this finding reflects average people’s intrinsic
psychological gain under repeated stimuli. Hence, it makes sense that the gain
is associated with personal response behavior, rather than network structure.
Moreover, we find that the gain is robust against the change of message
popularity. This finding supports that there exists a relatively fixed gain
brought by repeated exposures. Based on the above findings, we propose a
parsimonious model to predict the saturated numbers of forwarding activities of
messages. Our work could contribute to better understandings of behavioral
psychology and social media analytics.
Below: Forwarding
dynamics in a direct follower network. The figure in the left shows a
simple direct follower network of root user 0. When user 0 posts a message, all
of his followers will be exposed to this message once (the numbers in braces).
In the second step, user 1 forwards this message (dark colour), all the
followers of user 1, which is user 2, 3 and 4 (in the shaded area) are exposed
to this message one more time. Then user 7 forwards this message. Same thing
happens except that now user 4 has been exposed to the message three times
since he follows both user 1 and user 7.
Full article
at: http://goo.gl/lOhwPd
By: Cangqi Zhou, Qianchuan Zhao,* and Wenbo Lu
Center for
Intelligent and Networked Systems (CFINS), Department of Automation and TNList,
Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
Beijing
University of Posts and Telecommunications, CHINA
Conceived and designed the experiments: CZ QZ. Performed the
experiments: CZ. Analyzed the data: CZ QZ WL. Contributed
reagents/materials/analysis tools: CZ. Wrote the paper: CZ QZ WL.
* E-mail: nc.ude.auhgnist@cqoahz
More at: https://twitter.com/hiv_insight
No comments:
Post a Comment