This study
examined long-term outcomes of children who spent their first one to eighteen
months in a US prison nursery. Behavioral development in 47 preschool children
who lived in a prison nursery was compared with 64 children from a large
national dataset who were separated from their mothers because of
incarceration. Separation was associated with significantly worse
anxious/depressed scores, even after controlling for risks in the caregiving
environment. Findings suggest that prison nursery co-residence with
developmental support confers some resilience in children who experience early
maternal incarceration. Co-residence programs should be promoted as a best
practice for incarcerated childbearing women....
Empirical data on development of infants and toddlers during
the prison nursery stay suggests positive or neutral short-term outcomes.
Children who resided in the nurseries in New York State and whose mothers
received an additional developmentally supportive nursing intervention showed
motor and mental development within normal limits during the nursery stay (Byrne, 2010). Rates of secure attachment were
not significantly different than those seen in low-risk community groups of
children (Byrne, Goshin, & Joestl,
2010). This is the inverse of what would be expected given the
disproportionately high percentage of their mothers who had insecure attachment
or unresolved trauma in their own childhoods (Borelli, Goshin, Joestl, Clark, & Byrne, 2010).
Infants and toddlers in Spanish prison nurseries were also found to be
developing within normal limits (Jiménez and Palacios, 2003). Infants who spent
their first months of life in English prison nurseries in the 1980s showed
progressive declines in motor and cognitive scores during the nursery stay (Catan, 1992). Development returned to what is
considered normal within a month of release.
Results appear, as would be expected, to be related to
the quality of the nursery environment. Available descriptions of current US programs
differ widely from those in the UK at the time of the Catan study, which were
described as restrictive. The prison service of England and Wales implemented
changes in the Mother-Baby Units (Her Majesty’s Prison Service, 2008), but to
our knowledge no further evaluation research has been disseminated.
Descriptions of current US programs suggest an enriched environment. Nurseries
in the US are generally segregated away from other prison facilities, renovated
specifically to house children, and staffed by civilians in addition to
correction officers. Programming focuses on developing the relationship between
incarcerated mothers and their infants, promoting child development, and
providing parenting and life skills education (Byrne, 2010; Fearn, & Parker, 2004; Kauffman, 2006)...
Table 1
Demographic Characteristics of Former Prison Nursery Resident and Separated Families
Prison Nursery (n = 47) | Separated (n = 64) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
% | n | M (SD) | % | n | M (SD) | |
Caregiver relationship | ||||||
Mother | 79 | 37 | 89 | 57 | ||
Nonmaternal caregiver | 21 | 10 | 11 | 7 | ||
Maternal Race/Ethnicitya | ||||||
Black, Non-Latina* (African, African-American, West Indian) | 32 | 15 | 70 | 44 | ||
Latina | 23 | 11 | 22 | 14 | ||
White, Non-Latina* | 45 | 21 | 8 | 5 | ||
Maternal age at child’s birth, Years | 28.0 (6.6) | 24.8 (5.4) | ||||
Under 20 years of age | 6 | 3 | 17 | 11 | ||
Married at child’s birth* | 17 | 8 | 2 | 1 | ||
High school/general equivalency diploma at child’s birthb | 72 | 34 | 56 | 36 |
*p ≤ .01
Table 2
Behavior problems and risks in the caregiving environment of former prison nursery resident and separated preschoolers
% | Prison Nursery (n = 47) | % | Separated (n = 64) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | M (SD) | Range | n | M (SD) | Range | |||
Behavior Problems | ||||||||
Aggressivea | 12.4 (7.8) | 0 – 27 | 14.2 (8.3) | 1 – 33 | ||||
Attention Deficit/Hyperactivea | 5.7 (3.1) | 1 – 12 | 6.3 (3.1) | 0 – 11 | ||||
Anxious/Depresseda* | 3.2 (2.4) | 0 – 8 | 4.4 (2.6) | 0 - 10 | ||||
Withdrawn* | 1.6 (1.8) | 0 - 6 | 2.3 (2.2) | 0 - 9 | ||||
Ecological Risks | ||||||||
Substance use/problem drinking | ||||||||
Prenatalb | 35 | 16 | 36 | 23 | ||||
Past 12 months | 28 | 13 | 20 | 13 | ||||
Public assistance | 87 | 41 | 84 | 54 | ||||
Elevated parenting distressc | ||||||||
17 | 8 | 23 | 15 | |||||
Harsh Parenting | ||||||||
Swore or cursed | 36 | 17 | 22 | 14 | ||||
Physical assault | 77 | 36 | 80 | 51 | ||||
Neglect | 11 | 5 | 14 | 9 | ||||
Risk Scale | 3.2 (1.5) | 0 - 7 | 3.2 (1.5) | 0 – 7 |
aSeparated sample n = 50
bPrison nursery sample n = 49
cSeparated sample n = 63
*p ≤ .05
Note: Risk scale is the sum of maternal education at the child’s birth (1 = less than high school/general equivalency diploma), prenatal substance use, substance use in the past 12 months, current receipt of public assistance, high parenting distress, swearing or cursing, minor physical assault in the past 12 months, neglect in the past 12 months
Full article at: http://goo.gl/tqNqO9
Columbia
University School of Nursing
Correspondence concerning this article should be address to:
Lorie S. Goshin, PhD, RN, Assistant Professor, Hunter-Bellevue School of
Nursing, 425 East 25th Street, Room 428W, New York NY 10010. Phone: (212)
481-4377, Fax: (212) 481-8237, Email: ude.ynuc.retnuh@nihsogl
Lorie S. Goshin is now at Hunter-Bellevue School of Nursing.
More at: https://twitter.com/hiv_insight
No comments:
Post a Comment