The heightened level of risk
for HIV infection among African-American and Latino young men who have sex with
men (YMSM) is driven by multi-level influences. \
Using cross-sectional data, we
examined HIV testing patterns among urban YMSM of color in a high HIV
sero-prevalence area (ages 16 to 21 years). Self-reported frequency of testing
was high with 42% of youth reporting testing at a greater frequency than
recommended guidelines. There were no differences between less frequent and
high frequent testers on sexual risk behaviors. Most (80%) youth cited
reassurance of HIV-negative status as a reason for testing. Further, over half
of the sample reported numerous other reasons for HIV testing, which spanned
individual, partner, social, and structural levels of influence. Approximately
half of respondents indicated that peers, family members, and counselors
influenced their motivation to get tested. Of concern, youths’ first HIV test
occurred approximately two years after their first sexual experience with
another male.
These results indicate the need to consider developmental issues
as well as for comprehensive, multi-level efforts to ensure that YMSM of color
test at the CDC-recommended frequency, but not less than this or too frequently.
Minimum Frequency HIV Testers % (N = 43) | High Frequency HIV Testers % (N = 37) | Total % (N = 80) | |
---|---|---|---|
Individual Influences | |||
Want to be reassured not HIV positive (n = 79) | 73.8 | 83.8 | 78.5 |
Feel anxious or worried about being HIV positive (n = 80) | 48.8 | 64.9 | 56.3 |
Feel at risk due to own behavior * (n = 80) | 37.2 | 62.1 | 48.8 |
Diagnosed with an STD (n = 79) | 31.0 | 37.8 | 34.2 |
Wanted to stop using condoms (n = 80) | 25.6 | 40.5 | 32.5 |
Want to have children† (n = 80) | 16.3 | 35.1 | 25.0 |
Partner Level Influences | |||
Have a new sexual partner (n = 80) | 46.5 | 54.1 | 50.0 |
My partner’s sexual behavior | 42.9 | 54.1 | 48.1 |
Suspect my partner is HIV positive† (n = 79) | 35.7 | 56.8 | 45.6 |
A new partner asked† (n = 80) | 20.9 | 37.8 | 28.8 |
Risk from my partner’s HIV status (n = 79) | 19.0 | 32.4 | 25.3 |
Risk from my partner’s drug use (n = 79) | 19.0 | 21.6 | 20.3 |
Might have exposed partner to HIV (n = 79) | 11.9 | 24.3 | 17.7 |
Social Influences | |||
Friends or family members were getting tested * (n = 80) | 34.9 | 62.2 | 47.5 |
Friends or family were HIV positive (n = 80) | 11.6 | 24.3 | 17.5 |
Structural Influences | |||
A counselor or other professional suggested (n = 80) | 48.8 | 56.8 | 53.8 |
Offered as part of my regular medical care† (n = 79) | 58.1 | 38.9 | 49.4 |
Research study (n = 80) | 20.9 | 27.0 | 23.8 |
Received a stipend (n = 80) | 20.9 | 27.0 | 21.3 |
In foster care (n = 80) | 9.3 | 18.9 | 13.8 |
*p < .05.
†p < .10
Full article at: http://goo.gl/7Een9u
By: Noelle R. Leonard,* Sonali Ragan, Marya V. Gwadz, and Temi Aregbesola
Noelle R. Leonard, New York University, College of Nursing;
Noelle R. Leonard: ude.uyn@4lrn
More at: https://twitter.com/hiv
insight
No comments:
Post a Comment