Cohort Differences in the Marriage-Health Relationship for Midlife Women

The present study aimed to identify potential cohort differences in midlife women’s self-reported functional limitations and chronic diseases. Additionally, we examined the relationship between marital status and health, comparing the health of divorced, widowed, and never married women with married women, and how this relationship differs by cohort.

Using data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), we examined potential differences in the level of functional limitations and six chronic diseases in two age-matched cohorts of midlife women in the United States: Pre-Baby Boomers, born 1933–1942, N = 4574; and Early Baby Boomers, born 1947–1956, N = 2098. Linear and logistic regressions tested the marital status/health relationship, as well as cohort differences in this relationship, controlling for age, education, race, number of marriages, length of time in marital status, physical activity, and smoking status.

We found that Early Baby Boom women had fewer functional limitations but higher risk of chronic disease diagnosis compared to Pre-Baby Boom women. In both cohorts, marriage was associated with lower disease risk and fewer functional limitations; however, never-married Early Baby Boom women had more functional limitations, as well as greater likelihood of lung disease than their Pre-Baby Boom counterparts (OR = 0.28).

Results are discussed in terms of the stress model of marriage, and the association between historical context and cohort health (e.g., the influence of economic hardship vs. economic prosperity). Additionally, we discuss cohort differences in selection into marital status, particularly as they pertain to never-married women, and the relative impact of marital dissolution on physical health for the two cohorts of women...

1. Early Baby Boom women (assessed in 2006) will be less likely to have chronic diseases and will have fewer functional limitations than the Pre-Baby Boom women (assessed in 1992).
2. For both cohorts, currently married women and never-married women will show indications of being healthier than their divorced or widowed counterparts.
3. Between cohorts, the comparative advantage for married and never-married women will decrease, such that the relative health advantage for Early Baby Boom women who were married or who never married over their divorced or widowed colleagues will be smaller, whereas the relative health advantage for married and never married women will remain robust for the Pre-Baby Boom cohort. 

Below:  Marital Status by Cohort Interaction on Functional Limitations. This figure illustrates the model-based pattern of marital status and cohort effects on the number functional limitations.

Full article at: http://goo.gl/fJJ1i1

By: Nicky J. Newton,1 Lindsay H. Ryan,2 Rachel T King,3 and Jacqui Smith2

¹Foley Center for the Study of Lives, School of Education and Social Policy, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL

2Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

3

²Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

³Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH

   

More at:  https://twitter.com/hiv_insight

Perceptions of Credibility of Sexual Abuse Victims Across Generations

The success of prosecutions of perpetrators of sexual abuse often depends substantially upon the perceived credibility of the victim witness. However, perceptions of credibility may vary by generation of the observer, and the constitution of juries may therefore lead to bias. In this study we examined whether perceptions of credibility of female victims of sexual abuse varied across generation Y, generation X, "baby boomers", and "builders". 

One hundred and twenty-eight jury-eligible members of the community from each generation (N=512) responded to ten questions assessing the perceived believability, competence, trustworthiness, demeanour and sexual naiveté of females providing testimony related to alleged sexual abuse. 

Although consistent between-generation differences were not found for all questions, or all four groups of generational cohorts, in instances where significant differences were found, it was consistently the older generation groups (builders and baby boomers) that attributed less credibility to the victim than the younger generation groups (generation Y and generation X). The implications of these findings are discussed.

Purchase full article at: http://goo.gl/FSSHJS

By: Klettke B1, Hallford D1, Mellor D1.

• 1School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia. 

More at:  https://twitter.com/hiv_insight

Aging Baby Boomers Partly Explain the Rise in Older Prison Populations

Below:  Annual Prison Admissions Growth from 2000 – 2011 in 17 States

Below:  Observed and Simulated Changes in Prison Population Totals Relative to the Steady State Prison Population in 2011

Read more at: http://ht.ly/RqFcf MT https://twitter.com/LSEUSAblog