Risk factors for the
development of cannabis use disorders (CUDs) have been well–researched.
Comparatively little is known, however, about factors associated with the
persistence of CUDs over time.
This research explored whether the temporal
sequencing of comorbid psychiatric disorders in relation to the onset of the
index CUD episode were associated with the length of this episode.
Four
comprehensive diagnostic assessments were conducted between ages 16 and 30 with
a large and regionally representative community sample (n = 816), among which 173
persons were diagnosed with a lifetime CUD. In separate unadjusted analyses,
any internalizing disorder and any mood disorder with onset prior to that of
the index CUD episode were each significantly and negatively associated with
CUD duration. These effects, however, were reduced to trend-level in adjusted
analyses that controlled for putative confounders. Following the onset of the
index CUD episode, the subsequent occurrence of any axis I disorder,
internalizing disorder, externalizing disorder, or other substance use disorder
during the index CUD episode was significantly and positively associated with
the duration of that episode in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses.
These
findings collectively suggest that the presence of internalizing-spectrum
disorders prior to the onset of the index CUD episode affords some modest
protection against protracted episodes, whereas the emergence of broad-spectrum
psychopathology within the index CUD episode, most notably non-cannabis
substance use disorders, is associated with greater disorder persistence.
The
relevance of these findings for various motivational models of cannabis
addiction is discussed.
Descriptive Statistics for Demographic Variables and Bivariate Associations with the Duration of Index Cannabis Use Disorder Episode (n = 173)
| Predictor | % (SE) or M (SD) | Coef (SE) | p | r2 |
| Participant Characteristics, % (SE) |
| Male | 52 (4) | 26.1 (6.7) | .001 | .082 |
| Non-white | 9 (2) | 1.7 (12.0) | .890 | <.001 |
| Pubertal timing | | | | |
| Early vs. on-time | 25 (4) | −6.2 (7.9) | .428 | .004 |
| Late vs. on-time | 18 (3) | 16.4 (10.7) | .127 | .017 |
| Early vs. late | 60 (6) | −22.7 (12.8) | .082 | .050 |
| History of repeating grade before age 12 | 14 (3) | 4.0 (10.0) | .694 | .001 |
| Family Demographic Variables |
| Dual versus single parent household, % (SE) | 44 (4) | −4.5 (7.0) | .523 | .002 |
| At least one parent completed college, % (SE) | 41 (4) | −4.6 (7.1) | .516 | .003 |
| Mean parent age at T1, M (SD) | 41.5 (5.6) | −1.1 (0.3) | .081 | .018 |
| Number of older siblings, M (SD) | 0.9 (1.1) | −2.8 (3.1) | .359 | .005 |
Notes. SE = standard error; M = mean; SD = standard deviation; Coef = regression coefficient estimate.
Richard F. Farmer, Oregon Research Institute;
Correspondence concerning this report should be directed to
Richard Farmer, Oregon Research Institute, 1776 Millrace Drive, Eugene, Oregon,
97403, United States of America. Email: gro.iro@remrafr
Richard F. Farmer, Derek B. Kosty, John R. Seeley, Jeff M.
Gau, Susan C. Duncan, and Peter M. Lewinsohn, Oregon Research Institute; Denise
D. Walker, School of Social Work, University of Washington.