Showing posts with label Chongwe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chongwe. Show all posts

Monday, October 12, 2015

Longitudinal Adherence to Antiretroviral Drugs for Preventing Mother-To-Child Transmission of HIV in Zambia

Adherence to antiretroviral (ARV) drugs is essential for eliminating new pediatric infections of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Since the Zambian government revised the national guidelines based on option A (i.e., maternal zidovudine and infant ARV prophylaxis) of the World Health Organization’s 2010 guidelines, no studies have assessed adherence to ARVs during pregnancy up to the postpartum period. This study aimed to examine adherence to ARVs and identify the associated risk factors.

A prospective cohort study was conducted in the Chongwe district from June 2011 to January 2014. Self-reported adherence to ARVs was examined during pregnancy and at one week, six weeks, and 24 weeks postpartum among 321 HIV-positive women. The probability of remaining adherent to ARVs was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the risk factors for non-adherence were identified using the Cox proportional hazard regressions—treating loss to follow-up as non-adherence. The statuses of HIV in HIV-exposed infants were assessed in January 2014.

During the study period, 326 infants were born to HIV-positive women, 262 (80.4 %) underwent HIV testing, and 11 (3.4 %) had their HIV infection detected at the time that they had the latest HIV testing as of January 2014. The ARV adherence rate was 82.5 % during pregnancy, 84.2 % at one week postpartum, 81.5 % at six weeks postpartum, and 70.5 % at 24 weeks postpartum. The probability of remaining adherent to ARVs was 0.61 at day 50, 0.35 at day 100, 0.18 at day 200, and 0.06 at day 300. Attending a referral health center (HC) was a risk factor for non-adherence compared with attending rural HCs that provided HIV care/treatment (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.71, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.57–0.88) and those that did not provide HIV care/treatment (aHR 0.58, 95 % CI 0.46–0.74). A new diagnosis of HIV infection compared to a known HIV-positive status before pregnancy was another risk factor for non-adherence (aHR 1.24, 95 % CI 1.03–1.50).

Maintaining adherence to ARVs through pregnancy to the postpartum period remains a crucial challenge in Zambia. To maximize the treatment benefits, adherence to ARVs and retention in care should be improved at all health facilities.

Below:  Probability of remaining adherent to ARVs. Definition of non-adherence to ARVs (secondary definition) includes: missed doses; not following prescribed schedule; missed visiting for scheduled interview; loss to follow up; and infant deaths



Full article at: http://goo.gl/rnNt5G

By: Sumiyo Okawa1, Mable Chirwa23, Naoko Ishikawa4*, Henry Kapyata23, Charles Yekha Msiska23, Gardner Syakantu5, Shinsuke Miyano4, Kenichi Komada34, Masamine Jimba1and Junko Yasuoka1
1Department of Community and Global Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
2Chongwe District Community Health Office, Chongwe, Zambia
3Ministry of Health Zambia-Japan International Cooperation Agency SHIMA project, Lusaka, Zambia
4National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1 Toyama, Shinjuku-ku 162-8655, Tokyo, Japan
5Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
  


Thursday, September 24, 2015

Frequency of HIV-Testing & Factors Associated with Multiple Lifetime HIV-Testing among a Rural Population of Zambian Men

Across sub-Saharan Africa, men's levels of HIV-testing remain inadequate relative to women’s. Men are less likely to access anti-retroviral therapy and experience higher levels of morbidity and mortality once initiated on treatment. More frequent HIV-testing by men at continued risk of HIV-infection is required to facilitate earlier diagnosis. This study explored the frequency of HIV-testing among a rural population of men and the factors associated with more frequent HIV-testing.

We conducted a secondary analysis of a population-based survey in three rural district in Zambia, from February-November, 2013. Households (N = 300) in randomly selected squares from 42 study sites, defined as a health facility and its catchment area, were invited to participate. Individuals in eligible households were invited to complete questionnaires regarding demographics and HIV-testing behaviours. Men were defined as multiple HIV-testers if they reported more than one lifetime test. Upon questionnaire completion, individuals were offered rapid home-based HIV-testing.

Of the 2376 men, more than half (61 %) reported having ever-tested for HIV. The median number of lifetime tests was 2 (interquartile range = 1-3). Just over half (n = 834; 57 %) of ever-testers were defined as multiple-testers. Relative to never-testers, multiple-testers had higher levels of education and were more likely to report an occupation. Among the 719 men linked to a spouse, multiple-testing was higher among men whose spouse reported ever-testing (adjusted prevalence ratio = 3.02 95 % CI: 1.37-4.66). Multiple-testing was higher in study sites where anti-retroviral therapy was available at the health facility on the day of a health facility audit. Among ever-testers, education and occupation were positively associated with multiple-testing relative to reporting one lifetime HIV-test. Almost half (49 %) of ever-testers accepted the offer of home-based HIV-testing.

Reported HIV-testing increased among this population of men since a 2011/12 survey. Yet, only 35 % of all men reported multiple lifetime HIV-tests. The factors associated with multiple HIV-testing were similar to factors associated with ever-testing for HIV. Men living with HIV were less likely to report multiple HIV-tests and employment and education were associated with multiple-testing. The offer of home-based HIV-testing increased the frequency of HIV-testing among men.

Although men's levels of ever-testing for HIV have increased, strategies need to increase the lifetime frequency of HIV-testing among men at continued risk of HIV-infection.


Below:  Scatter plot of correlation between multiple-testing among ever-testers and ever-testing at cluster-level




Read more at:  http://ht.ly/SEkto 

By: B. Hensen1*, JJ Lewis2, A. Schaap23, M. Tembo3, M. Vera-Hernández4, W. Mutale5, HA Weiss2, J. Hargreaves1, JSA Stringer6 and H. Ayles37