Showing posts with label KAP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label KAP. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 30, 2016

Knowledge of University Students in Szeged, Hungary About Reliable Contraception Methods & Sexually Transmitted Diseases

INTRODUCTION:
Promiscuity and lack of use of reliable contraceptive methods increase the probability of sexually transmitted diseases and the risk of unwanted pregnancies, which are quite common among university students.

AIM:
The aim of the study was to assess the knowledge of university students about reliable contraceptive methods and sexually transmitted diseases, and to assess the effectiveness of the sexual health education in secondary schools, with specific focus on the education held by peers.

METHOD:
An anonymous, self-administered questionnaire survey was carried out in a randomized sample of students at the University of Szeged (n = 472, 298 women and 174 men, average age 21 years) between 2009 and 2011.

RESULTS:
62.1% of the respondents declared that reproductive health education lessons in high schools held by peers were reliable and authentic source of information, 12.3% considered as a less reliable source, and 25.6% defined the school health education as irrelevant source. Among those, who considered the health education held by peers as a reliable source, there were significantly more females (69.3% vs. 46.6%, p = 0.001), significantly fewer lived in cities (83.6% vs. 94.8%, p = 0.025), and significantly more responders knew that Candida infection can be transmitted through sexual intercourse (79.5% versus 63.9%, p = 0.02) as compared to those who did not consider health education held by peers as a reliable source. The majority of respondents obtained knowledge about sexual issues from the mass media.

CONCLUSIONS:
Young people who considered health educating programs reliable were significantly better informed about Candida disease

Purchase full article [Article in Hungarian] at:  http://goo.gl/SPkzcb

By:  Devosa I1,2, Kozinszky Z1,3, Vanya M1,4,5, Szili K1,4,5, Fáyné Dombi A1,2,6, Barabás K7.
  • 1Egészségtudományi és Egészségfejlesztő Kutató Csoport, Kecskeméti Főiskola, Tanítóképző Főiskolai Kar Kecskemét.
  • 2Szegedi Akadémiai Bizottság Oktatáselméleti Munkabizottság, Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Szeged.
  • 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Blekinge Hospital Karlskrona, Svédország.
  • 4Szent-Györgyi Albert Klinikai Központ, Szülészeti és Nőgyógyászai Klinika, Szegedi Tudományegyetem, Általános Orvostudományi Kar Szeged.
  • 5Mediteam Zrt. Szeged.
  • 6Tanító- és Óvóképző Intézet, Alkalmazott Pedagógia és Pszichológia Tanszék, Szegedi Tudományegyetem, Juhász Gyula Pedagógusképző Kar Szeged.
  • 7Magatartástudományi Intézet, Szegedi Tudományegyetem, Általános Orvostudományi Kar Szeged.
  •  2016 Apr;157(14):539-46. doi: 10.1556/650.2015.30356.




Sunday, March 20, 2016

Prevention & Care of Pediatric HIV Infection in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso: Knowledge, Attitudes & Practices of the Caregivers

Background
The paediatric Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) epidemic still progresses because of operational challenges in implementing prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMCT) programs. We assessed the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of children’s caregivers regarding mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of HIV, paediatric HIV infection, early infant diagnosis (EID), and paediatric antiretroviral treatment in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Methods
We undertook a qualitative survey in the four public hospitals managing HIV exposed or infected children, in Ouagadougou in 2011. A sociologist used a semi-structured questionnaire to interview caregivers of children less than 5 years old attending the paediatrics wards on their KAP. Study participants were divided into four groups as follows:
those who did not yet know their children’s HIV infection status, those who were waiting for their children’s HIV test results, those who were waiting for antiretroviral treatment, and those who were already on antiretroviral treatment.

Results
A total of 37 caregivers were interviewed. The mean age was 32.5 years, and 29 (78 %) were mothers. Twenty seven (73 %) caregivers had primary or higher level of education, and 15 (40 %) described their occupation as “housewife”. Overall, 36 (97 %) of caregivers knew that the main route of HIV transmission for infants was through MTCT and 14 (38 %) specified that it occurred during pregnancy or delivery. Five percent thought that MTCT of HIV occurred during conception. PMTCT interventions could help prevent infant HIV infection according to 32 (87 %) caregivers. Thirty five percent of caregivers stated EID as a prevention strategy. Fifty-four percent of the participants believed that replacement feeding option would prevent MTCT of HIV; 24 (65 %) stated that they would prefer medical practitioners seek caregivers’ consent before carrying out any HIV-test for their child, and that caregivers’ consent was not compulsory before antiretroviral treatment. All caregivers thought that it was necessary to treat HIV-infected children, although they did not know what interventions could be done.

Conclusions
This study highlighted the low level of caregivers’ knowledge on paediatric HIV prevention and care in Ouagadougou. Awareness programs targeting caregivers need to be strengthened in order to improve the uptake of HIV early infant diagnosis and care.

Caregivers’ knowledge, attitudes and perceptions in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, 2011
Total N = 37 100 %Group 1 N = 11 100 %Group 2 N = 4 100 %Group 3 N = 5 100 %Group 4 N = 17 100 %Groups 1 + 2 + 3 N = 20 100 %P-value (Group 1 + 2 + 3 vs Group 4)
Caregiver’s knowledge of existing interventions to prevent MTCT of HIV
 Yes30 (81)7 (64)4 (100)3 (60)16 (94)14 (70)0.16
 No1 (3)0 (0)0 (0)1 (20)0 (0)1 (5)
 No response6 (16)4 (36)0 (0)1 (20)1 (6)5 (25)
Caregiver’s knowledge regarding existing methods of infant HIV diagnosis
 Yes32 (86)8 (73)4 (100)5 (100)15 (88)17 (85)0.77
 No5 (14)3 (27)0 (0)0 (0)2 (12)3 (15)
Caregiver’s knowledge regarding existing treatment of HIV-infected infants
 Yes37 (100)11 (100)4 (100)5 (100)17 (100)Not applicable
 No0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
Caregiver’s attitude regarding the practice of their child systematic HIV testing
 For31 (84)11 (100)3 (75)4 (80)13 (76)18 (90)0.26
 Against6 (16)0 (0)1 (25)1 (20)4 (24)2 (10)
Caregiver’s attitude regarding the antiretroviral treatment of HIV-infected children
 For37 (100)11 (100)4 (100)5 (100)17 (100)20 (100)Not applicable
 Against0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0)
Parent’s consent needed for child HIV-test
 Yes24 (65)8 (73)3 (75)4 (80)9 (53)15 (75)0.16
 No13 (35)3 (27)1 (25)1 (20)8 (47)5 (25)
Parent’s consent needed for child treatment
 Yes11 (30)6 (55)0 (0)1 (20)4 (24)7 (35)0.25
 No24 (65)4 (36)3 (75)4 (80)13 (76)11 (55)
 No response2 (5)1 (9)1 (25)0 (0)0 (0)2 (10)
Group 1: caregivers of HIV-infected child currently treated with antiretroviral therapy
Group 2: caregivers of HIV-infected child not yet initiated on antiretroviral therapy
Group 3: caregivers waiting for their child’s HIV post-test result
Group 4: caregivers attending paediatric ward, with an unknown HIV child status
Vs versus

Full article at:   http://goo.gl/1Dwg43

Projet MONOD, ANRS 12206, Centre de Recherche Internationale pour la Santé, 09 BP 168 Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
Centre Muraz, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
CHU Charles De Gaules, Service de Pédiatrie médicale, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
CHU Yalgado Ouédraogo, Service de Pédiatrie, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
Inserm U1219, Institut de Santé Publique, Epidémiologie et Développement, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
Inserm U1027 Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France




Saturday, March 5, 2016

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Acceptability of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis among Individuals Living with HIV in an Urban HIV Clinic

Introduction
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective tool to reduce HIV transmission. The primary objective of this study was to assess awareness of PrEP by individuals living with HIV (HIV+) and acceptance of its use for their HIV negative (HIV-) partners.

Methods
A cross sectional survey was conducted among individuals living with HIV who received care at an urban HIV clinic between January 2013 and June 2013. The survey examined knowledge, attitudes, and acceptability of PrEP, and perception of transmission risk of HIV. Chi-Square test and Fisher's Exact test were used to compare proportions.

Results
Among 206 subjects living with HIV, 15.3% (32) had heard of PrEP. Men who have sex with men (MSM) were more likely to be aware of PrEP than all others (p = 0.003). Once educated about PrEP those who believed PrEP would reduce their partner’s risk for HIV were more likely to recommend PrEP to their partner (p<0.001). 92% of all respondents said they would be “extremely likely/likely” to discuss PrEP use with their provider. Of 159 subjects whose main partner was HIV-, MSM (p = 0.007), male participants (p = 0.044), and those who were consistently taking meds (p = 0.049) were more likely to be aware of PrEP. Those who perceived they were at risk of transmitting HIV (p<0.001) and those who were consistently taking meds (0.049) were more likely to agree that PrEP could reduce the risk of HIV to their partners.

Conclusion
This study illustrates a low awareness of PrEP but once educated the willingness of a cohort of individuals living with HIV to recommend PrEP to their partners. Our findings demonstrate the importance of providers informing their patients living with HIV about PrEP, as these persons are an underutilized link to support the uptake of PrEP by their HIV- partners.

Factors Associated with PrEP Awareness and Acceptance (206).
Awareness: Have you ever heard of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) before?
Yes N (%)No N (%)p-value
Sexual Orientation(Non MSM includes heterosexual, lesbian, and questioning/don’t’ know)Non- MSM (153)17(11.9)135 (89%)0.003
MSM (53)15 (28.8%)43(74.1)
GenderMale (117)25 (21.4)92 (78.6)0.011
Female (86)7 (8.1)79 (91.9)
Condom use during last sexual encounterYes (144)19(13.2)125(86.8)0.093
No (57)13(22.8)44 (77.2)
Have you missed any medicine in past 7 days?Yes (62)51 (82.3)11 (17.7)0.062
No (129)118(91.5)11(8.5)
Acceptance: How likely would you be to recommend PrEP to an HIV—partner?
Extremely Likely/LikelyExtremely Unlikely/ Unlikely/Unsurep-value
EducationFinished High School (134)122 (91.0)12 (9.0)0.170
Did not finish High School (72)61 (84.7)11 (15.3)
I believe PrEP will reduce the risk of HIV transmission to my partnerStrongly Agree/Agree (170)160 (94.1)10 (5.9)<0.001
Strongly Disagree/ Disagree/ Undecided (35)23 (65.7)12 (34.3)
Boldface indicates statistical significance (p<0.05)

Full article at:   http://goo.gl/bjjplk

Jesse Lawton Clark, Editor
1Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
2Department of Infectious Diseases and HIV Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
3Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, UNITED STATES
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Conceived and designed the experiments: EA ZS. Performed the experiments: JSJ. Analyzed the data: EG ES. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: EA JSJ ZS EG ES. Wrote the paper: JSJ EA ZS EG ES.
¤Current address: AJ Drexel Autism Institute, Drexel University School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
* E-mail: ude.lexerd@34jsJ




Sunday, February 7, 2016

Is Knowledge Regarding Tuberculosis Associated with Stigmatising and Discriminating Attitudes of General Population towards Tuberculosis Patients? Findings from a Community Based Survey in 30 Districts of India

Background
Stigmatising and discriminating attitudes may discourage tuberculosis (TB) patients from actively seeking medical care, hide their disease status, and discontinue treatment. It is expected that appropriate knowledge regarding TB should remove stigmatising and discriminating attitudes. In this study we assessed the prevalence of stigmatising and discriminating attitudes towards TB patients among general population and their association with knowledge regarding TB.

Method
A cross-sectional knowledge, attitude and practice survey was conducted in 30 districts of India in January-March 2011. A total of 4562 respondents from general population were interviewed using semi-structured questionnaires which contained items to measure stigma, discrimination and knowledge on TB.

Result
Of the 4562 interviewed, 3823 were eligible for the current analysis. Of these, 73% (95% CI 71.4–74.2) had stigmatising and 98% (95% CI 97.4–98.3) had discriminating attitude towards TB patients. Only 17% (95% CI 15.6–18.0) of the respondents had appropriate knowledge regarding TB with even lower levels observed amongst females, rural areas and respondents from low income groups. Surprisingly stigmatising (adjusted OR 1.31 (0.78–2.18) and discriminating (adjusted OR 0.79 (0.43–1.44) attitudes were independent of knowledge regarding TB.

Conclusion
Stigmatising and discriminating attitudes towards TB patients remain high among the general population in India. Since these attitudes were independent of the knowledge regarding TB, it is possible that the current disseminated knowledge regarding TB which is mainly from a medical perspective may not be adequately addressing the factors that lead to stigma and discrimination towards TB patients. Therefore, there is an urgent need to review the messages and strategies currently used for disseminating knowledge regarding TB among general population and revise them appropriately. The disseminated knowledge should include medical, psycho-social and economic aspects of TB that not only informs people about medical aspects of TB disease, but also removes stigma and discrimination.

Statements as part of the KAP survey tool to capture stigmatising and discriminating attitudes.
Stigmatising AttitudesNow I Will Make Some Statements About People Suffering From TB. Please Let Me Know How Much You Agree To These?Strongly Agree*Somewhat Agree*Disagree
1A family with TB patient should not be allowed to participate in any social function
2Married female TB patient should be sent off to her parent’s house
3Children with TB should not be allowed to go to school
4Children of parents suffering from TB should not be allowed to go to school
5Daily wage Laborer, suffering from TB should not be allowed to work
6TB patient are threat to community
7TB patients should be left isolated in the community
Discriminating AttitudesWhich of the following you would agree to do?YesNo**DK/CS
1Share a meal with person you know had TB
2If you suspect one of the female member is suffering from TB, would you take her to hospital
3Marry your daughter to a boy knowing had a TB
4Isolate your family member having TB in the house
5Marry your son to a girl who you know had TB
6Send your daughter in law to parent’s house if she had TB in order to protect other family members from TB
* Strongly agree and somewhat agree have been considered as affirmatives for stigmatising attitudes
** Don’t know/Can’t say

Full article at:   http://goo.gl/2V326x

Selvakumar Subbian, Editor
International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, South-East Asia Regional Office, New Delhi, India
Public Health Research Institute at RBHS, UNITED STATES
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Conceived and designed the experiments: KDS SS SSC. Performed the experiments: KDS. Analyzed the data: KDS SS SSC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: KDS SS SSC. Wrote the paper: KDS SS SSC.