Showing posts with label Liberia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Liberia. Show all posts

Sunday, February 7, 2016

Estimating the Magnitude of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting in Norway: An Extrapolation Model

Background
With emphasis on policy implications, the main objective of this study was to estimate the numbers of two main groups affected by FGM/C in Norway: 1) those already subjected to FGM/C and therefore potentially in need for health care and 2) those at risk of FGM/C and consequently the target of preventive and protective measures. Special attention has been paid to type III as it is associated with more severe complications.

Methods
Register data from Statistics Norway (SSB) was combined with population-based survey data on FGM/C in the women/girls’ countries of origin.

Results
As of January 1st 2013, there were 44,467 first and second-generation female immigrants residing in Norway whose country of origin is one of the 29 countries where FGM/C is well documented. About 40 pct. of these women and girls are estimated to have already been subjected to FGM/C prior to immigration to Norway. Type III is estimated in around 50 pct. of those already subjected to FGM/C. Further, a total of 15,500 girls are identified as potentially at risk, out of which an approximate number of girls ranging between 3000 and 7900 are estimated to be at risk of FGM/C.

Conclusion
Reliable estimates on FGM/C are important for evidence-based policies. The study findings indicate that about 17,300 women and girls in Norway can be in need of health care, in particular the 9100 who are estimated to have type III. Preventive and protective measures are also needed to protect girls at risk (3000 to 7900) from being subjected to FGM/C. Nevertheless, as there are no appropriate tools at the moment that can single these girls out of all who are potentially at risk, all girls in the potentially at risk group (15,500) should be targeted with preventive measures.

Below:  FGM/C Percentage of girls and women already subjected to FGM/C in Norway by country of origin



Below:  Numbers of girls and women subjected to FGM/C type III by most represented countries of origin



Full article at:   http://goo.gl/QFkFuS

Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, P.b. 181 Nydalen, 0409 Oslo, Norway
Samfunnsøkonomisk analyse (Formerly DAMVAD Norge AS), Olavsvei 112, 1450 Nesoddtangen, Norway
Mai M. Ziyada, Email: on.stvkn@adayiz.m.m.





Wednesday, January 13, 2016

Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: Risk Management and Strategies for Social Workers and Health Care Professionals

Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is a traditional practice originating in Africa. Its worst forms cause irreparable harm to girls and women and have no medical justification. Based on a literature review of global responses to FGM/C and conversations with Australian women who migrated from FGM/C practicing countries, this paper provides some background on FGM/C and its epidemiology, outlining its prevalence, types, and health risks and complications for women and girls. It discusses risk-prevention strategies, first, for health practitioners in identifying, screening, and supporting women affected by FGM/C and, second, for welfare and social workers and health care professionals to identify, work with, and prevent girls from being cut. Consistent with international trends in addressing the risks of FGM/C, the paper suggests practice responses for coordinated responses between professionals, communities from practicing countries, and governments of different countries.

Countries grouped according to prevalence, types I, II, and III and laws against FGM/C
CategoriesPrevalence of girls and women of reproductive age who report having been cut, and Type of FGC/MCountriesCountries with laws against FGM/C
1. Very high prevalence countries, almost universalOver 80% of girls and women of reproductive age reported having been cut, 30% Type IIISomalia (98%), Guinea (96%), Djibouti (93%), Egypt (91%). Eritrea (89%), Mali (89%), Sierra Leone (88%), Sudan (88%).Djibouti, Egypt. Eritrea, Guinea, Somalia, Sudan.
2. Moderately high prevalence countriesBetween 51% and 80% of girls and women cut, predominantly Types I and IIGambia (76%), Burkina Faso (76%), Ethiopia (74%), Mauritania (69%), Liberia (66%).Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Mauritania.
3. Moderately low prevalence countriesBetween 26% and 50% of girls and women cut, predominantly Types I and IIGuinea Bissau (50%), Chad (44%), Cote D’Ivoire (38%), Kenya (27%), Nigeria (27%), Senegal (26%).Chad, Cote D’Ivoire, Kenya, Senegal, Guinea Bissau, Nigeria.
4. Low prevalenceBetween 10 and 25%, predominantly Types I and IICentral African Republic (24%), Yemen (23%), United Republic of Tanzania (15%), Benin (13%).Central African Republic, Benin, United Republic of Tanzania.
5. Very low prevalenceBelow 10%Iraq (8%), Ghana (4%), Togo (4%), Niger (2%), Cameroon (1%), Uganda (1%).Ghana, Niger, Togo.
Notes: Data from UNICEF 2013,4 and Macfarlane and Dorkenoo.15
Abbreviation: FGM/C, female genital mutilation/cutting.

Full article at:   http://goo.gl/h2My9U

School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Correspondence: Susan Costello, School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University, 360 Swanston Street, Melbourne 3001, VIC, Australia, Email ua.ude.timr@olletsoc.nasus








Thursday, January 7, 2016

Quantifying Poverty as a Driver of Ebola Transmission

BACKGROUND:
Poverty has been implicated as a challenge in the control of the current Ebola outbreak in West Africa. Although disparities between affected countries have been appreciated, disparities within West African countries have not been investigated as drivers of Ebola transmission. To quantify the role that poverty plays in the transmission of Ebola, we analyzed heterogeneity of Ebola incidence and transmission factors among over 300 communities, categorized by socioeconomic status (SES), within Montserrado County, Liberia.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:
We evaluated 4,437 Ebola cases reported between February 28, 2014 and December 1, 2014 for Montserrado County to determine SES-stratified temporal trends and drivers of Ebola transmission. A dataset including dates of symptom onset, hospitalization, and death, and specified community of residence was used to stratify cases into high, middle and low SES. Additionally, information about 9,129 contacts was provided for a subset of 1,585 traced individuals. To evaluate transmission within and across socioeconomic subpopulations, as well as over the trajectory of the outbreak, we analyzed these data with a time-dependent stochastic model. Cases in the most impoverished communities reported three more contacts on average than cases in high SES communities (p<0.001). Our transmission model shows that infected individuals from middle and low SES communities were associated with 1.5 (95% CI: 1.4-1.6) and 3.5 (95% CI: 3.1-3.9) times as many secondary cases as those from high SES communities, respectively. Furthermore, most of the spread of Ebola across Montserrado County originated from areas of lower SES.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE:
Individuals from areas of poverty were associated with high rates of transmission and spread of Ebola to other regions. Thus, Ebola could most effectively be prevented or contained if disease interventions were targeted to areas of extreme poverty and funding was dedicated to development projects that meet basic needs.

Below:  Key factors of Ebola transmission based on socioeconomic status (SES) of probable and confirmed cases



Full article at:   http://goo.gl/myN1Ll

By:  Fallah MP1,2,3,4Skrip LA4Gertler S4Yamin D4,5Galvani AP3,4.
  • 1Community-Based Initiative, Ministry of Health, Monrovia, Liberia.
  • 2National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, PREVAIL-III Study, Monrovia, Liberia.
  • 3A.M. Dogliotti College of Medicine, University of Liberia, Monrovia, Liberia.
  • 4Center for Infectious Disease Modeling and Analysis, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
  • 5Department of Industrial Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  •  2015 Dec 31;9(12):e0004260. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004260. eCollection 2015. 


Thursday, November 12, 2015

HIV Incidence Prior To, During, and After Violent Conflict in 36 Sub-Saharan African Nations, 1990-2012: An Ecological Study

The aim of this study was to determine the association between violent conflict and HIV incidence within and across 36 sub-Saharan Africa countries between 1990 and 2012.

We used generalized linear mixed effect modeling to estimate the effect of conflict periods on country-level HIV incidence. We specified random intercepts and slopes to account for across and within country variation over time. We also conducted a sub-analysis of countries who experienced conflict to assess the effect of conflict intensity on country-level HIV incidence. All models controlled for level of economic development, number of refugees present in the country, and year.

We found that, compared to times of peace, the HIV incidence rate increased by 2.1 per 1000 infections per year (95%CI: 0.39, 3.87) in the 5 years prior to conflict. Additionally, we found a decrease of 0.7 new infections per 1000 people per year (95%CI: -1.44, -0.01) in conflicts with 25 to 1000 battle-related deaths and a decrease of 1.5 new infections per 1000 people per year (95%CI:-2.50, -0.52) for conflict with more than 1000 battle-related deaths, compared to conflicts with less than 25 battle-related deaths

Our results demonstrate that HIV infection rates increase in the years immediately prior to times of conflict; however, we did not identify a significant increase during and immediately following periods of violent conflict. Further investigation, including more rigorous data collection, is needed, as is increased aid to nations at risk of violent conflict to help in the fight against HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa.

Below: Annual Minimum, Maximum, and Mean HIV Incidence in 36 Countries in sub-Saharan Africa, 1990–2012



Full article at:  http://goo.gl/JbyPdU

By:  Brady W. Bennett, Brandon D. L. Marshall, Annie Gjelsvik, Stephen T. McGarvey, Mark N. Lurie
Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States of America
 


Sunday, October 4, 2015

Risk Factors for Transactional Sex among Young Females in Post-Conflict Liberia

This study aimed to examine the risk factors for engaging in transactional sex among young females in Montserrado County, Liberia. Data from an HIV behavioral survey conducted among young people aged 14 - 25 years were used. The analytical sample included 493 sexually-experienced females. 

Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted. 
  • We found that 72% of our sample had ever engaged in transactional sex. 
  • Engagement in transactional sex was associated with 
    • education; 
    • reporting no earned income; 
    • longer duration of sexual activity; 
    • early sexual debut; 
    • history of sexual violence and 
    • multiple sexual partnerships. 
  • Respondents' age, residence, and drug/alcohol use were not associated with engagement in transactional sex. 
HIV interventions should incorporate educational strategies to reduce the prevalence of transactional sex among young people. These strategies should include economic opportunities to offset financial need as well as efforts to eradicate sexual violence.


Full PDF article at: http://goo.gl/xIggbD

1Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; 2 Social and Behavioral Health Sciences, FHI360, Durham, North Carolina, USA; 3Biostatistics, FHI360, Durham, North Carolina, USA.


Friday, September 4, 2015

Intimate Partner Violence & HIV in Ten Sub-Saharan African Countries: What Do the Demographic & Health Surveys Tell Us?

Below: Risk of HIV infection in women exposed to intimate partner violence



There were consistent and strong associations between HIV infection in women and physical violence, emotional violence, and male controlling behaviour (adjusted odds ratios ranged from 1·2 to 1·7; p values ranged from <0·0001 to 0·0058). The evidence for an association between sexual violence and HIV was weaker and only significant in the sample with women in their first union. The associations were dependent on the presence of controlling behaviour and a high regional HIV prevalence rate; when women were exposed to only physical, sexual, or emotional violence, and no controlling behaviour, or when HIV prevalence rates are lower than 5%, the adjusted odds ratios were, in general, close to 1 and insignificant.

The findings indicate that male controlling behaviour in its own right, or as an indicator of ongoing or severe violence, puts women at risk of HIV infection. HIV prevention interventions should focus on high-prevalence areas and men with controlling behaviour, in addition to violence.

Read more at: http://ht.ly/RONRO HT https://twitter.com/uniofgothenburg