Showing posts with label Reproductive Coercion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Reproductive Coercion. Show all posts

Saturday, March 26, 2016

Level of Young People Sexual and Reproductive Health Service Utilization and Its Associated Factors among Young People in Awabel District, Northwest Ethiopia

Background
Currently in Ethiopia, young people’s sexual and reproductive health services are limited and there is a growing issue of confidentiality and affordability of these health services. Moreover, the available services provided are not sensitive to the special needs of young people. Therefore, this study was aimed to assess young people’s sexual and reproductive health service utilization and its associated factors in Awabel district, Northwest Ethiopia.

Methods
A community based cross-sectional study was conducted among 781 randomly selected young people using a pre-tested structured questionnaires in Awabel district, Northwest Ethiopia. Data were entered into Epi data version 3.1 and analyzed using SPSS version 16.0 software.

Results
The mean age of respondents were 17.80 (+ 2.65) years. About 41% of young people had utilized sexual and reproductive health services. Young people from families of higher family expenditure, lived with mothers, participated in peer education and lived near to a Health Center were more likely to utilize sexual and reproductive health services. Furthermore, those who had a parental discussion on sexual and reproductive health (AOR (95% C.I): 2.23 (1.43, 3.46)) and ever had sexual intercourse (AOR (95% C.I): 1.88 (1.30, 2.71)) were more likely to utilize the service than their counterparts. On the other hand, those young people lived with their father and had a primary level of educational attainment was less likely to utilize the service.

Conclusion
Utilization of sexual and reproductive health services is low which needs a great attention where; if not intervened, young people might engage in risky sexual activities. Therefore, it needs a concerted effort from all the concerned bodies to improve their service utilization and thereby reduce the burden of young people’s disease and disabilities associated with sexual and reproductive health.

Below:  Situations how first sexual intercourse was started among young people in Northwest Ethiopia, 2015 (n = 474).




Below:  Reasons of young people for not utilizing SRH services in Northwest Ethiopia, 2015 (n = 439)




Full article at:   http://goo.gl/KrHnht

1Students Clinic, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia
2Department of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia
National Institute of Health, ITALY




Friday, March 4, 2016

A Family Planning Clinic-Based Intervention to Address Reproductive Coercion

OBJECTIVE:
We assessed the effectiveness of a provider-delivered intervention targeting reproductive coercion, an important factor in unintended pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN:
We randomized 25 family planning clinics (17 clusters) to deliver an education/counseling intervention or usual care. Reproductive coercion and partner violence victimization at one year follow-up were primary outcomes. Unintended pregnancy, recognition of sexual and reproductive coercion, self-efficacy to use and use of harm reduction behaviors to reduce victimization and contraception nonuse, and knowledge and use of partner violence resources were secondary outcomes. Analyses included all available data using an intention-to-treat approach.

RESULTS:
Among 4009 females ages 16 to 29 seeking care, 3687 completed a baseline survey prior to clinic visit from October 2011 to November 2012; 3017 provided data at 12-20 weeks post-baseline (T2) and 2,926 at 12 months post-baseline (T3) (79% retention). Intervention effects were not significant for reproductive coercion or partner violence. Intervention participants reported improved knowledge of partner violence resources and self-efficacy to enact harm reduction behaviors. In time point specific models which included moderating effects of exposure to reproductive coercion at baseline, a higher reproductive coercion score at baseline was associated with a decrease in reproductive coercion one year later (T3). Use and sharing of the domestic violence hotline number also increased.

CONCLUSION:
This brief clinic intervention did not reduce partner violence victimization. The intervention enhanced two outcomes that may increase safety for women, specifically awareness of partner violence resources and self-efficacy to enact harm reduction behaviors. It also appeared to reduce reproductive coercion among women experiencing multiple forms of such abuse.

Purchase full article at:   http://goo.gl/O9YIyg

  • 1Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA. Electronic address: elizabeth.miller@chp.edu.
  • 2Department of Pediatrics and Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California.
  • 3Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
  • 4Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
  • 5Futures Without Violence, San Francisco, CA.
  • 6Division of Global Public Health in the Department of Medicine & Center on Gender Equity and Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA. 
  •  2016 Feb 15. pii: S0010-7824(16)00056-1. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.02.009.