Showing posts with label Sterilization. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sterilization. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 23, 2016
Sunday, March 20, 2016
Menstrual Pattern following Tubal Ligation: A Historical Cohort Study
Background
Tubal ligation (TL) is
recommended for women who have completed their family planning. The existence
of the menstrual disorders following this procedure has been the subject of
debate for decades. This study was conducted to identify the relationship
between tubal ligation and menstrual disorders.
Materials and Methods
A historical cohort
study was carried out on 140 women undergoing tubal ligation (TL group) and on
140 women using condom as the main contraceptive method (Non-TL group). They
aged between 20 and 40 years and were selected from a health care center in Rudsar,
Guilan Province, Iran, during 2013-2014. The two groups were comparable in
demographic characteristics, obstetrical features and menstrual bleeding
pattern using a routine questionnaire. A validated pictorial blood loss
assessment chart (PBLAC) was also used to measure the menstrual blood loss.
Results
Women with TL had more
menstrual irregularity than those without TL (24.3 vs. 10%, P=0.002). Women
with TL had more polymenorrhea (9.3 vs. 1.4%, P=0.006), hypermenorrhea (12.1
vs. 2.1%, P=0.002), menorrhagia (62.9 vs. 22.1%, P<0.0001) and menometrorrhagia
(15.7 vs. 3.6%, P=0.001) than those without TL. There is a significant
difference in the PBLAC score between women with and without TL (P<0.0001).
According to logistic regression, age odds ratio [(OR=1.08, con- fidence
interval (CI):1.07-1.17, P=0.03)], TL (OR=5.95, CI:3.45-10.26, P<0.0001) and
cesarean section (OR=2.72, CI:1.49-4.97, P=0.001) were significantly associated
with menorrhagia.
Conclusion
We found significant
differences in menstrual disorders between women with and without TL.
Therefore, women should be informed by the health providers regarding the
advantages and disadvantages of TL before the procedures.
Comparison of menstrual disorders between groups
| Parameters | Non-TL | TL | Sig |
|---|---|---|---|
| Menstrual irregularities* | 14 (10) | 34 (24.3) | 0.002a |
| Oligomenorrhea* | 12 (8.6) | 21 (15) | 0.12a |
| Polymenorrhea* | 2 (1.4) | 13 (9.3) | 0.006a |
| Hypermenorrhea* | 3 (2.1) | 17 (12.1) | 0. 002a |
| Metrorrhagia* | 9 (6.4) | 12 (8.6) | 0.64a |
| Menorrhagia* | 31 (22.1) | 88 (62.9) | <0.0001a |
| Menometrorrhagia* | 5 (3.6) | 22 (15.7) | 0.001a |
| PBLAC score** | 87.91 ± 51.06 | 137.72 ± 90.91 | <0.0001b |
*; n (%), **; Values are mean ± SD, a; Chi-square test, b; T test, TL; Tubal ligation, and PBLAC; Pictorial blood loss assessment chart.
Full article at: http://goo.gl/m3gdFa
By: Shahideh
Jahanian Sadatmahalleh, M.Sc,1 Saeideh
Ziaei, M.D,1,* Anoshirvan
Kazemnejad, Ph.D,2 and Eesa
Mohamadi, Ph.D3
1Department
of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat
Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2Department
of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University,
Tehran, Iran
3Department
of Nursing, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran,
Iran
1 Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, Faculty of
Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of
Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medical
Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
* Corresponding Address:P.O. Box: 1415-111, Department of
Midwifery and Reproductive Health, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares
University, Tehran, Iran,
More at: https://twitter.com/hiv insight
Wednesday, February 17, 2016
Non-Barrier Contraceptive Use & Relation to Condom Use Behavior by Partner Type among Female Sex Workers in Andhra Pradesh, India
OBJECTIVE:
METHODS:
RESULTS:
CONCLUSIONS:
Full article at: http://goo.gl/jiQFHl
By: Reed E1, Erausquin JT2, Biradavolu M3, Servin AE4, Blankenship KM5.
- 1Assistant Professor, Division of Global Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
- 2Assistant Professor, Department of Public Health Education, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA.
- 3Scholar in Residence, Department of Sociology, American University, Washington, DC, USA.
- 4Postdoctoral Fellow, Division of Global Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
- 5Professor and Chair, Department of Sociology, American University, Washington, DC, USA.
- J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2015 Dec 23. pii: jfprhc-2014-100918. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2014-100918.
More at: https://twitter.com/hiv insight
Sunday, September 13, 2015
Associations of Marital Violence with Different Forms of Contraception: Cross-Sectional Findings from South Asia
Cross-sectional analyses
were conducted using marital violence data collected during the most recent
Demographic and Health Surveys from Bangladesh (n = 3665), India (n = 56 357),
and Nepal (n = 3037). Data were pooled to assess associations of marital
violence (physical or sexual) with modern contraception use (current spacing or
sterilization).
Sexual marital violence was
associated with both modern spacing contraception and sterilization. Sexual violence was reported more often by pill users (9.8% vs
5.5% for non-users) but less often by condom users (4.5% vs 5.8% for
non-users).
Sexual marital violence
might increase use of contraception that need not require husband involvement
(pill) but decrease use of methods that require his cooperation (condom) or
support for mobility, funds, or time (sterilization).
Read more at: http://ht.ly/S9ASk
By: Anita Raj,a,b,c,* Lotus McDougal,a,b Elizabeth Reed,a,b and Jay G. Silvermana,b
aDivision of Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA
bCenter on Gender Equity and Health, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
cDepartment of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Clinical Addiction Research and Education, Boston University School of Medicine/Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
Monday, August 31, 2015
Family Planning for Strangers: An Experiment on the Validity of Reported Contraceptive Use
Below: Scatterplot for Reported Sterilization and TFR in Urban Latin American DHS data, 42 surveys from 15 countries, including OLS Regression Prediction Line (R2 = 0.14; p = 0.015).
Sterilization levels reported in the Dominican Republic appear well above what we would normally expect given prevailing patterns in the region. We suspect that the use of strangers as interviewers—the normative approach in data collection in both developed and developing country settings—may be partly responsible for this result, and may underlie a long history of bias in family planning data. We present findings from a field experiment conducted in a Dominican town in 2010, where interviewer assignment was randomized by level of preexisting level of familiarity between interviewer and respondent. In our data, sterilization use is higher when the interviewer is an outsider, as opposed to someone known to the respondent or from the same community. In addition, high sterilization use is correlated with a propensity of respondents to present themselves in a positive light to interviewers. These results call into question the routine use of strangers and outsiders as interviewers in demographic and health surveys.
Read more at: http://goo.gl/YdgGZ0 HT https://twitter.com/Hebrewu
Sterilization levels reported in the Dominican Republic appear well above what we would normally expect given prevailing patterns in the region. We suspect that the use of strangers as interviewers—the normative approach in data collection in both developed and developing country settings—may be partly responsible for this result, and may underlie a long history of bias in family planning data. We present findings from a field experiment conducted in a Dominican town in 2010, where interviewer assignment was randomized by level of preexisting level of familiarity between interviewer and respondent. In our data, sterilization use is higher when the interviewer is an outsider, as opposed to someone known to the respondent or from the same community. In addition, high sterilization use is correlated with a propensity of respondents to present themselves in a positive light to interviewers. These results call into question the routine use of strangers and outsiders as interviewers in demographic and health surveys.
Read more at: http://goo.gl/YdgGZ0 HT https://twitter.com/Hebrewu
Labels:
and Trinidad,
Bolivia,
Brazil,
Colombia,
Contraception,
Dominican Republic,
Ecuador,
Family Planning,
Guatemala,
Guyana,
Haiti,
Honduras,
Latin America,
Mexico,
Nicaragua,
Paraguay,
Peru,
pregnancy,
Sterilization
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)














