Showing posts with label transfusion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label transfusion. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 22, 2015

Two Decades of Risk Factors & Transfusion-Transmissible Infections in Dutch Blood Donors

Risk behavior-based donor selection procedures are widely used to mitigate the risk of transfusion-transmissible infections (TTIs), but their effectiveness is disputed in countries with low residual risks of TTIs.

In 1995 to 2014, Dutch blood donors infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV), or syphilis were interviewed by trained medical counselors to identify risk factors associated with TTIs. Trends in the prevalence and incidence of TTIs were analyzed using binomial regression models.

A total of 972 new donors and 381 repeat donors had TTIs. New donors had higher rates of TTIs compared to repeat donors. Although the HBV and HCV prevalence gradually decreased over time, the incidence of all five TTIs remained stable during the past two decades. In new donors the TTIs had the following risk profiles: "blood-blood contact" for HCV, "unprotected sex" for HIV and syphilis, and "country of birth" for HBV and HTLV. In infected repeat donors, sexual risk factors predominated for all TTIs. At posttest counseling, 28% of infected repeat donors admitted to risk factors leading to permanent donor exclusion if revealed during the donor selection procedure (predominantly male-to-male sex and recent diagnosis of syphilis).

The prevalence and incidence of TTIs among Dutch blood donors are six- to 60-fold lower than in the general Dutch population, illustrating the effectiveness of donor selection procedures. 

However, at least a quarter of infected donors appeared noncompliant to the donor health questionnaire (DHQ), suggesting that DHQs, or the way donor questioning is implemented, can be improved.

Via: http://ht.ly/SxNRz Purchase full article at: http://goo.gl/8uk6yF

  • 1Department of Blood-Borne Infections, Division Research, Sanquin Blood Supply Foundation, Amsterdam.
  • 2Department of Transfusion Technology Assessment, Division Research, Blood Supply Foundation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • 3Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • 4Department of Medical Donor Affairs, Division Blood Bank, Sanquin Blood Supply Foundation, Amsterdam.
  • 5Department of Clinical Virology (CINIMA), Academic Medical Centre/University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • 6Department of Virology, Division Diagnostics, Sanquin Blood Supply Foundation, Amsterdam.

  • More at:  https://twitter.com/hiv_insight

Sunday, September 13, 2015

Identification of Risk Factors for Hepatitis B and C in Peshawar, Pakistan

Hepatitis B and C need immediate worldwide attention as the infection rates are too high. More than 240 million people have chronic (long-term) liver infections. Every year, about 600,000 people die globally due to the acute or chronic consequences of hepatitis B and more than 350,000 people die from hepatitis C-related liver diseases.

Our study was designed as a case-control, descriptive study. It was conducted through formal interviews by using structured questionnaires. A total of 100 cases were included, with four controls for each case.

This study confirms household contact, history of dental work, history of surgery, sexual contact, and history of transfusion (blood and its components) as the main risk factors which are responsible for the increased prevalence of hepatitis.

The important risk factors, responsible for the high prevalence of hepatitis B and C in our society are household contact, history of dental work, history of surgery, sexual contact, and history of transfusion (blood and its components). The odds ratio of probability for these risk factors are: 4.2 for household contact history, 4.1 for history of dental work, 3.9 for sexual contact, 2.7 for history of surgery, and 2.1 for history of transfusion. Associations of other predictor variables (diabetes status, education level, profession, contact sports, intravenous drug abuse, residence, immunosuppression, and skin tattoos) were not statistically significant.


Below:  Profession versus hepatitis status


Below:  Sexual contact history versus hepatitis status



Below: Injection drug abuse history versus hepatitis status



Below:  Skin tattoos versus hepatitis status



Read more at:  http://ht.ly/Sa0aK 

By: Muhammad Shafiq, Muhammad Nadeem, Zeeshan Sattar, Sohaib Mohammad Khan, Sheikh Muhammad Faheem, Irfan Ahsan, Rabia Naheed,6 Tahir Mehmood Khattak,2 Shahzad Akbar,7 Muhammad Talha Khan, Muhammad Ilyas Khan, and Muhammad Zubair Khan

Correspondence: Muhammad Nadeem, Nishtar Medical College and Hospital, House 277, B-C, Block 17, Dera Ghazi Khan, Punjab, Pakistan