Previous research has shown
that negative attitudes towards immigrants and support for anti-immigrant
parties are observed both among those experiencing relative deprivation and those
experiencing relative gratification (so called v-curve). Whereas the effect of
relative deprivation is intuitive, the effect of relative gratification is more
difficult to explain. Why would economic prosperity provoke negative attitudes
towards immigrants? We first present correlational (Study 1) and experimental (Study 2) support for the v-curve.
In Study 1, in a
national Swiss referendum, a higher percentage anti-immigrant voting was found
in cantons with relatively lower and relatively higher relative disposable
income.
In Study 2, in a hypothetical society, more opposition to ‘newcomers’
joining society was found among poor or above average wealth group members than
among those in a moderate wealth group condition.
In Study 3, we replicate this
finding and also show that opposition to immigration is higher for all wealth
groups when societal inequality is growing rather than declining.
In a final
study, we examine different forms of relative gratification and mediators of
the relationship between relative gratification and opposition to immigration
(i.e., identification, collective self-definition as competent and cold, and
fear about future wealth).
Only fear about future wealth mediates this
relationship. We conclude that, paradoxically, relative gratification effects
are partly due to the fear of future deprivation.
Below: Opposition to immigration as a function of income level, Means and Standard Errors, Study 2
Below: Opposition to immigration as a function of income level and societal inequality, Means and Standard Errors, Study 3
Full article
at: http://goo.gl/PdcDdM
By: Jolanda Jetten,1,* Frank Mols,1 and Tom Postmes2
1University of Queensland, Brisbane,
Australia
2University of Groningen, Groningen, The
Netherlands
More at: https://twitter.com/hiv_insight


No comments:
Post a Comment