How do Hmong immigrant
adolescent girls’ decide to run away, return home, leave again, or stay home?
Video diaries by 11 sexually-exploited runaway Hmong girls, age 13–16, revealed
four themes: “Fighting restrictions,” resisting family cultural expectations
and desires to be like other American teens; “Not Running Away, Going Out to
Play,” which captured impulsive decision-making; “Unrestrained Partying”
described runaway experiences but minimized dangers they faced; and “Trying to
Change,” returning home because of family bonds and wanting to “be someone
good.” Given their limited ability to anticipate risks, interventions should
focus on runaway prevention initiatives for Hmong families and teens...
Running Away and Sexual Assault among Hmong Adolescent Girls
The dangers to youth who have run away and are
persistently street-involved are well documented internationally, and include a
high risk of being exposed to illicit drugs, sexually transmitted infections,
unintended pregnancy, depression, suicide attempts, and sexual exploitation (Cauce et al., 2000; Marshall et al., 2009; Milburn, Rotheram-Borus, Rice,
Mallett & Rosenthal, 2006). However, the pattern of repeated
short-term running away, defined as leaving home multiple times and staying
with people the family does not know, in short periods of one to fourteen days,
is less known. Youth who run away for one to three days but still return home
might be considered at lower risk than long-term runaways, but for those who
run repeatedly, the amount of time they are away from home can add up over the
course of a year, and can increase health risks such as early sexual onset (Thrane & Chen, 2010).
Auerswald and Eyre (2002) have described the life cycles of homeless youth, but
this research has not focused specifically on the patterns of leaving and
returning home for short-term runaways, which appears to be a common pattern
among Hmong teens in particular (Edinburgh & Saewyc, 2009). Without
understanding the motivations for repeated short-term runaway episodes,
clinicians might miss an important opportunity to intervene before adolescents
experience the significant negative health outcomes of street-entrenched youth (Saewyc & Edinburgh, 2010;Yoder, Whitbeck & Hoyt, 2004).
Hmong girls in the U.S. who have run away appear to be
more likely to experience sexual exploitation and severe sexual assaults, such
as gang rape, than their peers in other ethnic groups (Edinburgh, et al., 2006). Over three out of
four (77%) runaway Hmong girls treated in an urban child abuse clinical setting
reported being sexually assaulted by gang members, either via gang rape or
prostitution; the majority of these girls reported five or more sexual assault
episodes. The number of Hmong gangs in Minnesota and their level of criminal
activity has increased in severity (Straka, 2003), with rape being incorporated
into Hmong gang culture and its operational structure. Since 1997, authorities
have documented that gang initiations can involve bringing a girl, who believes
she is attending a party, to be raped by one person or “lined up” and raped by
a group of men (Scott, 2002; Straka, 2003). The results of such trauma
include high rates of sexually transmitted infections; in our earlier study of
runaways referred to the child abuse clinic, more than one in three Hmong
runaway girls tested positive for Chlamydia (Edinburgh, et al., 2006)...
Table 1
N | |
---|---|
Age | 13–16 years |
Living with two parents | 8/11 |
Exposure to domestic violence | 2/11* |
Intra-familial sexual abuse | 2/11* |
Intra-familial physical abuse | 2/11* |
Previous Child Protection Services involvement | 1/11 |
Type of Sexual Assault (may have experienced more than one type) | |
Gang rape | 2/11 |
Prostitution | 2/11 |
Multiple different perpetrators | 9/11 |
Single perpetrator | 2/11 |
Previous history of extra-familial sexual assault | |
Prior to running away | 0 |
History of self-harm | 8/11 |
Suicidal ideation | 10/11 |
Previous suicide attempt | 3/11 |
Substance use | |
Alcohol | 10/11 |
Marijuana | 3/11 |
Other drugs | 9/11 |
Table 2
Case | Age | Typical length of runaway experience | Number of times away from home | Longest interval away from home |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 14 | 2 – 3 days | > 10 times | 16 days |
2 | 13 | 2 – 3 days | > 10 times | 3 days |
3 | 14 | 2 – 3 days | > 10 times | 3 days |
4 | 15 | 1 – 2 days | > 10 times | 2 days |
5 | 16 | 180 days | 1 time | 180 days |
6 | 13 | 1 day | 1 time | 1 day |
7 | 15 | 2 – 3 days | > 10 times | 7 days |
8 | 13 | 1 – 2 days | > 10 times | 2 days |
9 | 14 | 1 – 2 days | > 10 times | 21 days |
10 | 15 | 1 day | < 5 times | 1 day |
11 | 13 | 2 – 3 days | > 10 times | 17 days |
Full article at: http://goo.gl/zcPKkt
By: Laurel D. Edinburgh, MSN, RN, CNP, Carolyn M. Garcia, PhD, MS, MPH, RN, and Elizabeth M. Saewyc, PhD, RN, PHN, FSAHM
Laurel D. Edinburgh, Nurse Clinician, Midwest
Children’s Resource Center, Children’s Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota, St.
Paul,Minnesota,
USA;
Corresponding author (for reprints requests): Laurel
Edinburgh, Midwest Children’s Resource Center, Children’s Hospitals and Clinics
of Minnesota, 347 N. Smith Ave, St. Paul, MN 55102, USA, Email: gro.nmsnerdlihc@hgrubnide.lerual
More at: https://twitter.com/hiv_insight
No comments:
Post a Comment