Showing posts with label Induced Abortion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Induced Abortion. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 5, 2016

Contextual Determinants of Induced Abortion: A Panel Analysis

OBJECTIVE
Analyze the contextual and individual characteristics that explain the differences in the induced abortion rate, temporally and territorially.

METHODS
We conducted an econometric analysis with panel data of the influence of public investment in health and per capita income on induced abortion as well as a measurement of the effect of social and economic factors related to the labor market and reproduction: female employment, immigration, adolescent fertility and marriage rate. The empirical exercise was conducted with a sample of 22 countries in Europe for the 2001-2009 period.

RESULTS
The great territorial variability of induced abortion was the result of contextual and individual socioeconomic factors. Higher levels of national income and investments in public health reduce its incidence. The following sociodemographic characteristics were also significant regressors of induced abortion: female employment, civil status, migration, and adolescent fertility.

CONCLUSIONS
Induced abortion responds to sociodemographic patterns, in which the characteristics of each country are essential. The individual and contextual socioeconomic inequalities impact significantly on its incidence. Further research on the relationship between economic growth, labor market, institutions and social norms is required to better understand its transnational variability and to reduce its incidence.

Below: Abortions per thousand live births in Europe during 2009



Full article at:   http://goo.gl/458IUb

Departamento de Economía Cuantitativa. Facultad de Economía y Empresa. Universidad de Oviedo. Oviedo, España
Correspondence: Mar Llorente-Marrón. Departamento de Economía Cuantitativa. Facultad de Economía y Empresa. Avda. del Cristo, s/n 33006 
Rev Saude Publica. 2016; 50: 8.
Published online 2016 Mar 10. doi:  10.1590/S1518-8787.2016050005917




Friday, January 22, 2016

Estimates of the Incidence of Induced Abortion & Consequences of Unsafe Abortion in Senegal

CONTEXT
Abortion is highly restricted by law in Senegal. Although women seek care for abortion complications, no national estimate of abortion incidence exists.

METHODS
Data on postabortion care and abortion in Senegal were collected in 2013 using surveys of a nationally representative sample of 168 health facilities that provide postabortion care and of 110 professionals knowledgeable about abortion service provision. Indirect estimation techniques were applied to the data to estimate the incidence of induced abortion in the country. Abortion rates and ratios were calculated for the nation and separately for the Dakar region and the rest of the country. The distribution of pregnancies by planning status and by outcome was estimated.

RESULTS
In 2012, an estimated 51,500 induced abortions were performed in Senegal, and 16,700 (32%) resulted in complications that were treated at health facilities. The estimated abortion rate was 17 per 1,000 women aged 15–44 and the abortion ratio was 10 per 100 live births. The rate was higher in Dakar (21 per 1,000) than in the rest of the country (16 per 1,000). Poor women were far more likely to experience abortion complications, and less likely to receive treatment for complications, than nonpoor women. About 31% of pregnancies were unintended, and 24% of unintended pregnancies (8% of all pregnancies) ended in abortion.

CONCLUSIONS
Unsafe abortion exacts a heavy toll on women in Senegal. Reducing the barriers to effective contraceptive use and ensuring access to postabortion care without the risk of legal consequences may reduce the incidence of and complications from unsafe abortion.

Below:  Estimated percentage distribution of abortions, by outcome, according to region and women’s characteristics, Senegal, 2012



Below:  Estimated percentage distribution of pregnancies, by planning status and outcome, Senegal, 2011–2012



Full article at:  http://goo.gl/hdk18s

By:  Gilda Sedghprincipal research scientistAmadou Hassane Syllastatistician and technical advisorJesse Philbinsenior research assistantSarah Keoghsenior research scientist, and Salif Ndiayedirector
Guttmacher Institute, New York.








Sunday, October 18, 2015

Contraceptive Use Following Spontaneous & Induced Abortion & Its Association with Family Planning Services in Primary Health Care: Results from a Brazilian Longitudinal Study

Although it is well known that post-abortion contraceptive use is high when family planning services are provided following spontaneous or induced abortions, this relationship remains unclear in Brazil and similar settings with restrictive abortion laws. Our study aims to assess whether contraceptive use is associated with access to family planning services in the six-month period post-abortion, in a setting where laws towards abortion are highly restrictive.

This prospective cohort study recruited 147 women hospitalized for emergency treatment following spontaneous or induced abortion in Brazil. These women were then followed up for six months (761 observations). Women responded to monthly telephone interviews about contraceptive use and the utilization of family planning services (measured by the utilization of medical consultation and receipt of contraceptive counseling). Generalized Estimating Equations were used to analyze the effect of family planning services and other covariates on contraceptive use over the six-month period post-abortion.

Women who reported utilization of both medical consultation and contraceptive counseling in the same month had higher odds of reporting contraceptive use during the six-month period post-abortion, when compared with those who did not use these family planning services [adjusted aOR = 1.93, 95 % Confidence Interval: 1.13–3.30]. Accessing either service alone did not contribute to contraceptive use. Age (25–34 vs. 15–24 years) was also statistically associated with contraceptive use. Pregnancy planning status, desire to have more children and education did not contribute to contraceptive use.

In restrictive abortion settings, family planning services offered in the six-month post-abortion period contribute to contraceptive use, if not restricted to simple counseling. Medical consultation, in the absence of contraceptive counseling, makes no difference. Immediate initiation of a contraceptive that suits women’s pregnancy intention following an abortion is recommended, as well as a wide range of contraceptive methods, including long-acting reversible methods, even in restrictive abortion laws contexts.

Table 1

Demographic characteristics of all participants, of participants who used contraception, and of participants who reported a pregnancy. Sao Paulo, 2012
VariablesAll participantsParticipants who used contraceptionParticipants who reported pregnancy
Time PointTime PointTime Point
Month 1Month 6Month 1Month 6Endline
Mean age (years)29.1 (7.4)29.6 (7.3)29.5 (6.8)29.7 (7.4)26.8 (6.9)
Mean age at first intercourse (years)17.2 (2.9)17.4 (2.9)17.2 (3.1)17.4 (2.8)16.9 (1.9)
Mean age at first pregnancy (years)21.7 (5.2)21.9 (5.1)22.0 (4.9)21.7 (5.0)20.7 (5.1)
Mean number of previous pregnancies2.5 (1.4)2.5 (1.4)2.6 (1.4)2.6 (1.5)2.3 (1.1)
Mean educational level (years)9.3 (2.5)9.5 (2.5)9.5 (2.6)9.3 (2.6)9.8 (1.4)
Color (%)
White49.655.250.652.947.1
Brown45.640.047.144.752.9
Black4.84.82.32.4-
Religion (%)
Catholic43.543.846.045.935.4
Protestant32.735.231.034.129.4
Other6.15.76.95.917.6
None17.715.316.114.117.6
Employed (%)59.960.964.458.858.8
Current living with partner (%)76.976.282.874.188.2
Desire to have more children (%)66.766.770.166.576.5
Previous pregnancy plan (%)
Planned29.931.429.927.141.2
Ambivalent49.049.550.650.635.3
Unplanned21.119.119.522.323.5
Total number of women147105a878517
Standard deviation (sd) in parentheses
anot included 17 women who reported a pregnancy

Below:  Utilization of medical consultation and receipt of contraception counseling reported by study respondents over a 6-month period post-abortion, by month. Sao Paulo, 2012



Below:  Percent of study respondents using contraception over the six-month post-abortion period, by month. Sao Paulo, 2012



Full article at: http://goo.gl/6RdWHt

School of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Enéas Carvalho de Aguiar, 419, cep 05403-000 São Paulo, Brazil