Showing posts with label conflict. Show all posts
Showing posts with label conflict. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 23, 2015

Poverty, Household Chaos & Interparental Aggression Predict Children’s Ability to Recognize & Modulate Negative Emotions

The following prospective longitudinal study considers the ways that protracted exposure to verbal and physical aggression between parents may take a substantial toll on emotional adjustment for 1,025 children followed from 6 to 58 months of age. Exposure to chronic poverty from infancy to early childhood as well as multiple measures of household chaos were also included as predictors of children’s ability to recognize and modulate negative emotions in order to disentangle the role of interparental conflict from the socioeconomic forces that sometimes accompany it. Analyses revealed that exposure to greater levels of interparental conflict, more chaos in the household, and a higher number of years in poverty can be empirically distinguished as key contributors to 58-month-olds’ ability to recognize and modulate negative emotion. Implications for models of experiential canalization of emotional processes within the context of adversity are discussed.

Protracted exposure to verbal conflict and violence between parents takes a substantial toll on children’s emotional and behavioral adjustment, and is associated with higher levels of depression and anxiety, and greater difficulties with social relationships with peers (see , for review). While research demonstrates the powerful role that cognitive appraisals may have for the interpretation of and response to threatening situations in middle and later childhood, less is known regarding the precursors of those emotional processes in the context of high levels of interparental conflict in early childhood (; ; ). In addition, fewer studies of interparental conflict and children’s emotional development (whether with older or younger children) have considered exposure to verbal and physical aggression in the context of other forms of environmental adversity, such as families’ struggles with income poverty. To pursue these questions, this study considers ways that higher levels of exposure to arguing, threatening, and frightening behavior between adults (alone and in conjunction with other forms of environmental adversity) may canalize low-income children’s experience of higher levels of difficulty processing emotional information, placing them at greater risk for difficulty in modulating emotions of fear, anxiety, and sadness as they enter school (; ). This theoretical framework of experiential canalization and accompanying empirical evidence to support it are briefly reviewed below. We then outline a set of pressing, unanswered questions in this area of scientific inquiry, along with our hypotheses, before presenting the methods and results of our study.

Below:  (Color online) Histograms of the frequency of both forms of aggression


Full article at:   http://goo.gl/mPzQgs

By:   C. Cybele Raver,a Clancy Blair,a Patricia Garrett-Peters,b and Family Life Project Key Investigators
aNew York University
bUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: C. Cybele Raver, Institute of Human Development and Social Change, New York University, 196 Mercer Street, 8th floor, New York, NY 10012; Email: ude.uyn@revar.elebyc
The Family Life Project Key Investigators include Lynne Vernon-Feagans, University of North Carolina; Mark Greenberg, Pennsylvania State University; Martha Cox, University of North Carolina; Clancy Blair, New York University; Peg Burchinal, University of North Carolina; Michael Willoughby, University of North Carolina; Patricia Garrett-Peters, University of North Carolina; Roger Mills-Koonce, University of North Carolina; and Maureen Ittig, Pennsylvania State University.
  

Sunday, December 13, 2015

Inter-Group Conflict & Cooperation: Field Experiments Before, During & After Sectarian Riots in Northern Ireland

The idea that cooperative groups out-compete less cooperative groups has been proposed as a theoretical possibility for the evolution of cooperation through cultural group selection. Previous studies have found an association between increased cooperation and exposure to inter-group violence, but most have not been able to identify the specific target of cooperation and are based on correlational data making it difficult to establish causality. 

In this study we test the hypothesis that inter-group conflict promotes parochial altruism (i.e., in-group altruism and out-group hostility) by using longitudinal data of a real-world measure of cooperation-charity and school donations-sampled before, during and after violent sectarian riots between Catholics and Protestants in Belfast, Northern Ireland. 

We find that conflict is associated with reductions in all types of cooperation, with reduced donations to a neutral charity, and both in-group and out-group primary schools. After the conflict, both in-group and out-group donations increased again. In this context we find no evidence that inter-group conflict promotes parochial altruism.

Below:  Map of Belfast with the neighborhoods Ballymacarrett 1 and Bellevue 2 in green and the 4 primary schools used in the donations experiments before, during and after the sectarian riots. Catholic primary schools (green markers) and Protestant primary schools (red markers).



Below:  Predicted donations by type over time. Predicted value (£) of an individual donating to the neutral charity Save the Children, an in-group primary school, an out-group primary school and all combined donations over time (before, during, and after the riots). These predicted values are controlled for individual household income, educational level, age, gender and religion. Error bars represent the standard errors.



Full article at:   http://goo.gl/mfidL5

By:   Silva AS1Mace R1.
  • 1Department of Anthropology, University College London London, UK. 


Sunday, September 20, 2015

Conflict, Displacement & Sexual & Reproductive Health Services in Mali

Little is known specifically about the effects of conflict and displacement on provision of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services. We aimed to understand the association between levels of conflict and displacement and the availability of SRH services in post-conflict Mali.

A national assessment was conducted between April and May 2013 employing Health Systems Availability Mapping System (HeRAMS). Data from 1581 primary care facilities were analysed, focusing on SRH services. Descriptive analyses and multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the availability of SRH services by different levels of conflict and displacement.

Of 1581 facilities, 1551 had data available to identify the details of service provision. The majority of the facilities were part of the public sector (79.1 %), identified as basic community primary care facilities (71.9 %). Overall 15.7 % of the facilities were in the zones under occupation, 40.3 % in the areas with high concentration of displaced population and 44 % in areas with low concentration of displaced populations. Between zones of low concentration of displaced populations and under occupation the likelihood of service availability varied between OR: 2.9 (95 % CI 2.0–4.4) for basic emergency obstetric care and OR: 41.7 (95 % CI 20.4–85.3) for family planning. All of the services within the three domains of SRH were more likely to be available in the low and high concentration displaced population areas compared to the facilities in the under occupation zones, after adjusting for other facility-related variables.

Areas with high concentration of displaced population had less service availability, and areas formerly under occupation had the least service availability. This suggests that those living in conflict areas, and many of those who are internally displaced, have poor access to essential SRH interventions. The systematic measurement of the availability of health services, including SRH, is feasible and can contribute to recovery planning in post-conflict and humanitarian settings.

Below:  Distribution of districts by levels of conflict, February 2013, reproduced based on [418]



Read more at:  http://ht.ly/Ssgmp 

NDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/The World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland