Opt-out HIV testing is a novel concept in Australia. In the
opt-out approach, health care providers (HCPs) routinely test patients for HIV
unless they explicitly decline or defer. Opt-out HIV testing is only performed
with the patients’ consent, but pre-test counselling is abbreviated. Australian
national testing guidelines do not currently recommend opt-out HIV testing for
the general population. Non-traditional approaches to HIV testing (such as
opt-out) could identify HIV infections and facilitate earlier treatment, which
is particularly important now that HIV is a chronic, manageable disease. Our
aim was to explore HCPs’ attitudes toward opt-out HIV testing in an Australian
context, to further understanding of its acceptability and feasibility.
Twenty four HCPs participated. Eleven participants had a
questioning attitude toward opt-out HIV testing, while eleven favoured the
approach. The remaining two participants had more nuanced perspectives that
incorporated some characteristics of the questioning and favouring attitudes.
Participants’ views about opt-out HIV testing largely fell into two contrasting
themes: normalisation and routinisation versus exceptionalism; and a need for
proof versus openness to new approaches.
Most HCPs in this study had dichotomous attitudes toward
opt-out HIV testing, reflecting contrasting analytical styles. While some HCPs
viewed it favourably, with the perceived benefits outweighing the perceived
costs, others preferred to have evidence of efficacy and cost-effectiveness.
1School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Faculty of Health
Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
2School of Occupational Therapy and Social Work, Faculty of Health
Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia

No comments:
Post a Comment