Observed differences between these HIV-positive key populations suggest
- PWID (vs. non-PWID) were least likely to have previously tested or initiate HIV care.
- MSM (vs. non-MSM) were more likely to have previously tested but not more likely to know their HIV-positive status.
Findings suggest engagement of key populations in HIV treatment is far below estimates observed for similarly resource-constrained generalized epidemics in sub-Saharan Africa. These data provide one of the first empirical-snapshots highlighting the extent of HIV treatment disparities in key populations.
Via: http://ht.ly/Skhm2
By: Smith LR1, Patterson TL2, Magis-Rodriguez C3, Ojeda VD4, Burgos JL4, Rojas SA5, Zúñiga ML6, Strathdee SA4.
- 1Division of Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive #0507, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0507, USA
- 2Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, USA.
- 3Centro Nacional para la Prevención y el Control del VIH y SIDA (CENSIDA), Mexico City, Mexico.
- 4Division of Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive #0507, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0507, USA.
- 5Family Health Centers of San Diego, San Diego, USA.
- 6School of Social Work, San Diego State University, San Diego, USA.
- More at: https://twitter.com/hiv_insight
No comments:
Post a Comment