To estimate the impact and cost-effectiveness of treatment
as prevention (TasP), pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and condom promotion for
serodiscordant couples in Nigeria.
A deterministic model of HIV-1 transmission within a cohort
of serodiscordant couples and to/from external partners was parameterized using
data from Nigeria and other African settings. The impact and cost-effectiveness
were estimated for condom promotion, PrEP and/or TasP, compared with a baseline
where antiretroviral therapy (ART) was offered according to 2010 national
guidelines (CD4 <350 cells/μl) to all HIV-positive partners. The impact was
additionally compared with a baseline of current ART coverage (35% of those
with CD4 <350 cells/μl). Full costs (in US $2012) of programme introduction
and implementation were estimated from a provider perspective.
Substantial benefits came from scaling up ART to all
HIV-positive partners according to 2010 national guidelines, with additional
smaller benefits of providing TasP, PrEP or condom promotion. Compared with a
baseline of offering ART to all HIV-positive partners at the 2010 national
guidelines, condom promotion was the most cost-effective strategy [US
$1206/disability-adjusted-life-year (DALY)], the next most cost-effective
intervention was to additionally give TasP to HIV-positive partners
(incremental cost-effectiveness ratio US $1607/DALY), followed by additionally
giving PrEP to HIV-negative partners until their HIV-positive partners initiate
ART (US $7870/DALY). When impact was measured in terms of infections averted,
PrEP with condom promotion prevented double the number of infections as condom
promotion alone.
The first priority intervention for serodiscordant couples
in Nigeria should be scaled up ART access for HIV-positive partners. Subsequent
incremental benefits are greatest with condom promotion and TasP, followed by
PrEP.
- 1aLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK bFamily Health International, Abuja cObafemi Awolowo University and New HIV Vaccine and Microbicide Advocacy Society, Lagos dUniversity of Jos, Jos eNational Agency for the Control of AIDS, Abuja, Nigeria fUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
No comments:
Post a Comment