The aim of this study was to design the content and
accompanying materials for a school-based program—Study without Drugs—for
adolescents in junior secondary schools in Suriname based on the starting
points and tasks of the fourth step of the Intervention Mapping protocol (which
consists of six steps). A program based on this protocol should include a
combination of theory, empirical evidence, and qualitative and quantitative
research.
Two surveys were conducted when designing the program. In
Survey I, teachers and students were asked to complete a questionnaire to
determine which school year they thought would be most appropriate for
implementing a drug-prevention program for adolescents (we completed a similar
survey as part of previous research). An attempt was made to identify suitable
culturally sensitive elements to include in the program. In Survey II, the same
teachers were asked to complete a questionnaire to determine the programs’
scope, sequence, structure, and topics as well as the general didactic
principles to serve as a basis for program design. After outlining the program
plan, lessons, and materials, we conducted a formative pretest evaluation among
teachers, students, and parents. That evaluation included measures related to
the program’s attractiveness, comprehensibility, and usefulness. The resulting
lessons were presented to the teachers for assessment.
The drug-prevention program we developed comprises 10
activities and lasts 2–2.5 months in an actual school setting. The
activities take place during Dutch, biology, physical education, art, religion,
and social studies lessons. We based the structure of the lessons in the
program on McGuire’s Persuasion Communication Model, which takes into account
important didactic principles. Evaluations of the program materials and lesson
plans by students, teachers, and parents were mostly positive.
We believe that using the fourth step of the Intervention
Mapping protocol to develop a drug-prevention intervention for adolescents has
a produced promising, feasible program.
Below: Intervention mapping
Full article
at: http://goo.gl/Z2X5mO
1Faculty of Social Sciences, Anton de Kom
University of Suriname, Leysweg 86, Suriname
2Department of Health Promotion, CAPHRI
School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht,
The Netherlands
3Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences,
Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
4Department of Education, Anton de Kom
Universiteit, Tammenga, Suriname
More at: https://twitter.com/hiv_insight
No comments:
Post a Comment