The HIV epidemic remains a major health challenge all over
the world. In 2013, an estimated 35million people were living with HIV
globally. Male circumcision is increasingly being adopted as a method of HIV
prevention. WHO and UNAIDS have advised that male circumcision be added to
current HIV interventions. Malawi is one of the countries hardest hit by
HIV/AIDS with a prevalence rate of 11 % and male circumcision prevalence
of 21.6 % in 2010. Prior to 2011, traditional male circumcision in Malawi
was the dominant form of male circumcision, mainly for cultural and religious
reasons. This paper looks at male circumcision as a prevention method against
HIV by examining the relationship between male circumcision and HIV status
among Malawian men.
The data used were collected as part of the 2010 Malawi
Demographic and Health Survey. The methodology used in the 2010 MDHS has been
comprehensively described by the National Statistical Office of Malawi and ICF
Macro. Our analysis is based on men aged 15–54 years who were tested for HIV
and responded to questions on circumcision during the survey. Sixty one percent
of the 7175 men interviewed in the MDHS, qualified for this analysis. The
sample was weighted to ensure representativeness. Frequencies,
cross-tabulations, univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were
conducted. Differences in the prevalence of HIV infection among circumcised and
uncircumcised men were determined with Chi-squared tests.
There is no significant difference in HIV prevalence between
circumcised (12 %) and uncircumcised men (10 %). Among circumcised
men, age and number of lifetime partners are the dominant correlates of HIV
status. Additionally, circumcised men who have had ritual sex are two times
more likely (OR = 2.399) to be HIV+ compared to
circumcised men who have never had ritual sex.
This study has demonstrated that traditional male
circumcision was not associated with HIV infection in pre-2010 Malawi. Among
circumcised men, age and number of lifetime partners are correlates to HIV
status while circumcised men who have had ritual sex are more likely to be
diagnosed with HIV than circumcised men who have not had ritual sex.
Table 2 | |||
Percent distribution of respondents by HIV status and selected background characteristics | |||
Background characteristics | HIV status | Sample size | |
Negative | Positive | ||
Age*** | |||
15–24 | 97.8 | 2.2 | 1533 |
25–39 | 87.5 | 12.5 | 1911 |
40+ | 81.1 | 18.9 | 914 |
Marital status*** | |||
Never married | 94.0 | 6.0 | 1778 |
Currently married | 87.8 | 12.2 | 2410 |
Formerly married | 76.3 | 23.7 | 170 |
Age at sexual debut** | |||
< 15 | 92.7 | 7.3 | 915 |
15-24 | 89.2 | 10.8 | 3294 |
25 + † | 87.7 | 12.3 | 149 |
Ever had ritual sex | |||
Yes | 86.4 | 13.6 | 159 |
No | 90.1 | 9.9 | 4199 |
Number of life time partners*** | |||
1 | 98.0 | 2.0 | 750 |
2 | 92.7 | 7.3 | 1082 |
3 | 89.3 | 10.7 | 921 |
4 | 91.6 | 8.4 | 486 |
5 | 85.2 | 14.8 | 371 |
6-9 | 80.7 | 19.3 | 394 |
10+ | 79.7 | 20.3 | 354 |
Type of residence*** | |||
Urban | 84.8 | 15.2 | 647 |
Rural | 91.4 | 8.6 | 3711 |
Region*** | |||
Northern | 93.2 | 6.8 | 750 |
Central | 91.9 | 8.1 | 1592 |
Southern | 87.2 | 12.8 | 2016 |
Religion | |||
Catholic | 89.9 | 8.4 | 984 |
Other Christian | 89.8 | 8.6 | 2930 |
Muslim | 90.4 | 7.7 | 444 |
Level of education | |||
None | 87.5 | 12.5 | 253 |
Primary | 90.3 | 9.7 | 2669 |
Secondary+ | 89.7 | 10.3 | 1436 |
Wealth index*** | |||
Poor | 92.2 | 7.8 | 1496 |
Medium | 91.7 | 8.3 | 903 |
Rich | 87.7 | 12.3 | 1959 |
Circumcision status* | |||
Circumcised | 87.9 | 12.1 | 831 |
Not circumcised | 90.5 | 9.5 | 3,527 |
Total | 89.9 | 10.1 | 4,358 |
Full article
at: http://goo.gl/Vhv8qx
1African Population and Health Research
Center (APHRC), Nairobi, 00100, Kenya
2APHRC, Nairobi, Kenya
3Chancellor College, University of Malawi,
Zomba, Malawi
More at: https://twitter.com/hiv_insight
No comments:
Post a Comment