Background
Tuberculosis
is a major public health problem especially in developing countries, the
comparative efficacy and safety of fluroquinolones (FQs) for adult patients
with newly diagnosed, sputum-positive tuberculosis remains controversial. We
aimed to investigate the benefits and risks of FQs-containing
(addition/substitution) regimens in this population.
Methods
A
network meta-analysis was performed to compare FQs (C: ciprofloxacin; O:
ofloxacin; Lo: levofloxacin; M: moxifloxacin; G: gatifloxacin) addition/substitution
regimen with standard HRZE regimen (ie isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide and
ethambutol) in newly diagnosed, sputum-positive tuberculosis. Medline, Embase
and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically
searched, randomized trials with duration longer than 8 weeks were included.
The primary outcome was week-8 sputum negativity, and secondary outcomes
included treatment failure, serious adverse events and death from all cause.
Results
Twelve
studies comprising 6465 participants were included in the network
meta-analysis. Löwenstein-Jensen culture method showed that HRZEM (OR 4.96, 95%
CI 2.83–8.67), MRZE (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.19–1.84) and HRZM (OR 1.32, 95% CI
1.08–1.62) had more sputum conversion than HRZE by the eighth week, whereas HRC
(OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19–0.77) and HRZO (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.24–0.92) were worse
than HRZE. Moxifloxacin-containing regimens showed more conversion than HRZE by
liquid method at the end of two months. But by the end of treatment,
FQs-containing regimens didn’t show superiority than HRZE on treatment failure.
There were no significant differences between any regimens on other outcomes
like serious adverse events and all-cause death.
Conclusion
This comprehensive network meta-analysis showed that
compared with HRZE, moxifloxacin-containing regimens could significantly
increase sputum conversion by the eighth week for patients with newly diagnosed
pulmonary tuberculosis while HRC and HRZO regimens were inferior. But all the
FQs-containing regimens did not show superiority in other outcomes (such as
treatment failure, serious adverse events and all-cause death). Thus, HRZE is
still an effective regimen for this population. Although
moxifloxacin-containing regimens have deomonstrated their potential, FQs-containing
regimens should be used with great caution to avoid widespread FQs-resistance
worldwide.
Below: Risk of bias summary graph.
Review authors’ judgments (Low, Unclear and High) for each risk of bias item shown as percentages across all included studies.
Full article at: http://goo.gl/UjBMDp
By:
Dandan Li, Su Shen, Sheng Cheng, Junxian Yu, Yang Zhang,
Chao Zhang
Department of Pharmacy, Beijing
Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Tiansheng Wang
Department of Pharmacy
Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking
University, Beijing, China
Huilin Tang
Department of Pharmacy, Peking
University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
More at: https://twitter.com/hiv_insight
No comments:
Post a Comment