We hypothesized that
observing social exclusion would influence observers’ judgments of the
humanness of its victims and perpetrators. Specifically, we speculated that
people would attribute victims and perpetrators to lower and higher mental
capacities, respectively.
Participants observed a simulated computer-based ball
tossing game in which one of the players was either ostracized or not. They
then rated the game players on traits associated with two dimensions of
humanness, namely Human Nature (HN) and Human Uniqueness (HU).
Overall,
participants who witnessed an exclusion game judged the victim as less human on
both domains compared to one of the perpetrators as well as to a player in the
control condition. The perpetrator was attributed higher HN, but not
significantly higher HU, compared to the control player.
In addition, the less
HN attributes a target was assigned, the more she was expected to be vulnerable
to exploitation. On most of the other measures of target impression, however,
the victim was rated more favorably than the perpetrator.
The findings imply
that social exclusion victims are often subtly derogated compared to the
perpetrators, even while they are also more positively evaluated otherwise.
Below: Human Nature and Human Uniqueness scores. The left side (A) and the right side (B) depict the Inclusion and Exclusion conditions, respectively.
Full article at: http://goo.gl/Hq4WHN
By: Yeong O. Park and Sang H. Park*
Department of
Psychology, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, South Korea
Edited by: Mark
Hallahan, College of the Holy Cross, USA
Reviewed by: Christina M.
Brown, Arcadia University, USA; Diego Fernandez-Duque, Villanova University,
USA
*Correspondence: Sang H.
Park, rk.ca.kubgnuhc@krapeehgnas
This article was submitted to Personality and Social
Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology.
More at: https://twitter.com/hiv_insight
No comments:
Post a Comment