This article presents an
overview of empirical research on the role of observer variables in rape victim
blaming (female attacked by a male perpetrator). The focus is on literature
from the last 15 years. The variables observer gender, ambivalent sexism, rape
myth acceptance, and rape empathy are discussed in relation to victim blaming.
Most research on rape is conducted using diverse methods and approaches that
result in a great disparity regarding the role of these variables in predicting
blame assignments. Despite the inconsistencies, most studies show that men hold
the victim more responsible for her own victimization than women.
Findings
further indicate that higher scores on sexist ideologies and rape myth
acceptance predict higher victim blame, and that higher rape empathy scores
predict lower victim blame. Theoretical and practical implications are
discussed.
...Overall, the analysis of the
literature showed that men are more likely to score higher on victim blaming,
that higher scores on sexist ideologies and rape myth acceptance predict higher
victim blaming, and that higher levels of empathy towards the victim predict
lower victim blaming. As such, this theoretical article provides an overview of
the current knowledge regarding the impact of these variables upon victim
blaming biases. Additional empirical research is needed, however, in order to
clarify how these factors affect such biased attributions. As a final point,
similar theoretical articles may prove useful in summarizing the influence of
other variables on blame attributions, namely those related to situational
factors (e.g., type of relationship with the rapist) or the victim’s
characteristics (e.g., type of woman, sexual history, clothing, and substance
misuse).
Full article at: HTML http://goo.gl/wKcdyf PDF https://goo.gl/Fx90CL
More at: https://twitter.com/hiv_insight
No comments:
Post a Comment