Tuesday, December 29, 2015

Sub-Epidemics Explain Localized High Prevalence of Reduced Susceptibility to Rilpivirine in Treatment-Naive HIV-1 Infected Patients: Subtype- & Geographic Compartmentalization of Baseline Resistance Mutations

OBJECTIVE:
The latest NNRTI rilpivirine is indicated for HIV-1 patients initiating antiretroviral treatment, but the extent of genotypic rilpivirine resistance in treatment-naïve patients outside clinical trials is poorly defined.

STUDY DESIGN:
This retrospective observational study of clinical data from Belgium and Portugal evaluates genotypic information from HIV-1 drug-naive patients obtained for the purpose of drug resistance testing. Rilpivirine resistance-associated mutations (RPV-RAMs) were defined based on clinical trials, phenotypic studies and expert-based resistance algorithms. Viral susceptibility to rilpivirine alone and to the single-tablet regimen was estimated using expert-based resistance algorithms.

RESULTS:
In 4631 HIV-1 treatment-naive patients infected with diverse HIV-1 subtypes, major RPV-RAMs were detected in 4.6% while complete viral susceptibility to rilpivirine was estimated in 95% of patients. Subtype C and F1 infected patients displayed the highest levels of reduced viral susceptibility at baseline, respectively 13.2% and 9.3%, mainly due to subtype- and geographic-dependent occurrence of RPV-RAMs E138A and A98G as natural polymorphisms. Strikingly, a founder effect in Portugal resulted in a 138A prevalence of 13.2% in local subtype C-infected treatment-naive patients. The presence of transmitted drug resistance did not impact our estimates.

CONCLUSION:
Rilpivirine is the first HIV-1 inhibitor for which, in absence of transmitted drug resistance, intermediate or high-level genotypic resistance can be detected in treatment-naive patients. The extent of rilpivirine susceptibility in treatment-naive patients differs depending on the HIV-1 subtype and on the dynamics of local compartmentalized epidemics. The highest prevalence of reduced susceptibility was found to be 15.7% in Portuguese subtype C-infected treatment-naive patients. In this context, even in the absence of TDR, drug resistance testing at baseline should be considered extremely important before starting treatment with this NNRTI.

Purchase full article at:   http://goo.gl/ihlgsi

  • 1KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Leuven, Belgium ; kristof.theys@rega.kuleuven.be.
  • 2KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Leuven, Belgium.
  • 3University Hospitals Leuven, AIDS Reference Laboratory, Leuven, Belgium ; kristel.vanlaethem@uzleuven.be.
  • 4LMCBM, SPC, HEM , Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • 5Instituto Superior de Ciências da Saúde Sul, Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz (CiiEM), Lisbon, Portugal ; gomes.perpetua@gmail.com.
  • 6KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Leuven, Belgium ; Guy.Baele@rega.kuleuven.be.
  • 7Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Institute for Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Global Health and Tropical Medicine, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • 8Universidad del Rosario, Fundación Instituto de Inmunología de Colombia (FIDIC), Molecular Biology and Immunology Department, Bogota, Colombia ; andreapinedap@gmail.com.
  • 9KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Leuven, Belgium ; annemie.vandamme@uzleuven.be.
  • 10KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Leuven, Belgium ; RicardoJorge.Camacho@rega.kuleuven.be.
  • 11Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Institute for Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Global Health and Tropical Medicine, Lisbon, Portugal ; ana.abecasis@ihmt.unl.pt. 


No comments:

Post a Comment