OBJECTIVES
We assessed retention and
predictors of attrition (recorded death or loss to follow-up) in antiretroviral
treatment (ART) clinics in Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia.
METHODS
We conducted a retrospective
cohort study among adults (≥18 years) starting ART during 2003–2010. We
purposefully selected six health facilities per country and randomly selected
250 patients from each facility. Patients who visited clinics at least once
during the 90 days before data abstraction were defined as retained. Data on
individual and programme level risk factors for attrition were obtained through
chart review and clinic manager interviews. Kaplan–Meier curves for retention
across sites were created. Predictors of attrition were assessed using a
multivariable Cox-proportional hazards model, adjusted for site-level
clustering.
RESULTS
From 17 facilities, 4147
patients were included. Retention ranged from 52.0% to 96.2% at 1 year to
25.8%–90.4% at 4 years. Multivariable analysis of ART initiation
characteristics found the following independent risk factors for attrition:
younger age [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) =
1.30 (1.14–1.47)], WHO stage 4 ([aHR (95% CI): 1.56 (1.29–1.88)], >10%
bodyweight loss [aHR (95%CI) = 1.17 (1.00–1.38)], poor functional status
[ambulatory aHR (95%CI) = 1.29 (1.09–1.54); bedridden aHR1.54 (1.15–2.07)], and
increasing years of clinic operation prior to ART initiation in government
facilities [aHR (95%CI) = 1.17 (1.10–1.23)]. Patients with higher CD4 cell
count were less likely to experience attrition [aHR (95%CI) = 0.88 (0.78–1.00)]
for every log (tenfold) increase. Sites offering community ART dispensing [aHR
(95% CI) = 0.55 (0.30–1.01) for women; 0.40 (0.21–0.75) for men] had
significantly less attrition.
CONCLUSIONS
Patient retention to an
individual programme worsened over time especially among males, younger persons
and those with poor clinical indicators. Community ART drug dispensing
programmes could improve retention.
Below: Kaplan-Meier estimates by site in Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia
Below: Kaplan-Meier estimates by Community-Based Distribution (CBD) of ARVs in Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia
By: Olivier Koole,1,2 Sharon Tsui,3,4 Fred Wabwire-Mangen,5 Gideon Kwesigabo,6 Joris Menten,2 Modest Mulenga,7Andrew Auld,8 Simon Agolory,8 Ya Diul Mukadi,3 Robert Colebunders,2,9 David R. Bangsberg,10,11 Eric van Praag,3Kwasi Torpey,3 Seymour Williams,8 Jonathan Kaplan,8 Aaron Zee,8 and Julie Denison3,4
1Department of Infectious Disease
Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
2Clinical Sciences Department, Institute of
Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
3FHI 360, Durham, NC, USA
4Department of International Health, Johns
Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
5Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere
University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
6Muhimbili University of Health and Allied
Sciences, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania
7Tropical Diseases Research Centre, Ndola,
Zambia
8Division of Global AIDS, United States
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
9Epidemiology and Social Medicine,
University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
10Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston,
MA, USA
11Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Corresponding Author Olivier Koole, Department
of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical
Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK. Tel.: +265 997 680 108; Email: ku.ca.mthsl@elook.reivilo
More at: https://twitter.com/hiv insight
No comments:
Post a Comment