Objective
To assess the availability and quality of population size
estimations of female sex workers (FSW), men who have sex with men (MSM),
people who inject drug (PWID) and transgender women.
Methods
Size estimation data since 2010 were retrieved from global
reporting databases, Global Fund grant application documents, and the
peer-reviewed and grey literature. Overall quality and availability were assessed
against a defined set of criteria, including estimation methods, geographic
coverage, and extrapolation approaches. Estimates were compositely categorized
into ‘nationally adequate’, ‘nationally inadequate but locally adequate’,
‘documented but inadequate methods’, ‘undocumented or untimely’ and ‘no data.’
Findings
Of 140 countries assessed, 41 did not report any estimates
since 2010. Among 99 countries with at least one estimate, 38 were categorized
as having nationally adequate estimates and 30 as having nationally inadequate
but locally adequate estimates. Multiplier, capture-recapture, census and
enumeration, and programmatic mapping were the most commonly used methods. Most
countries relied on only one estimate for a given population while about half
of all reports included national estimates. A variety of approaches were
applied to extrapolate from sites-level numbers to national estimates in
two-thirds of countries.
Conclusions
Size estimates for FSW, MSM, PWID and transgender women
are increasingly available but quality varies widely. The different approaches
present challenges for data use in design, implementation and evaluation of
programs for these populations in half of the countries assessed. Guidance
should be further developed to recommend: a) applying multiple estimation
methods; b) estimating size for a minimum number of sites; and, c) documenting
extrapolation approaches.
Below: Categorization of population size estimates of female sex workers, men who have sex with men, people who inject drugs, and transgender women in low- and middle-income countries, 2010–2014
Full article at: http://goo.gl/wG4uNP
By:
Strategic Information and Evaluation Department, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, Geneva, Switzerland
Technical Advice and Partnerships Department, The Global Fund to fight AIDS,
Tuberculosis and Malaria, Geneva, Switzerland
Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China
Department of HIV/AIDS, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
Technical Evaluation Reference Group Support Team, The Global Fund to fight
AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, Geneva, Switzerland
More at: https://twitter.com/hiv insight
No comments:
Post a Comment