Showing posts with label Bipolar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bipolar. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 20, 2016

Substance Use Is a Risk Factor for Violent Behavior in Male Patients with Bipolar Disorder

BACKGROUND:
To determine the factors involved in violent behavior in patients with bipolar disorder (BD) and to investigate the relationship between violence and substance use disorder (SUD).

METHODS:
A sample of 100 male inpatients diagnosed with BD type I who were experiencing a current mood episode participated in the study. Violent behavior was defined as physical aggression against others. All patients were evaluated using the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale-positive subscale (PANSS-p), Barratt Impulsivity Scale-11 (BIS-11), Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ) and Overt Aggression Scale (OAS). Lifetime SUD and current use of substances were evaluated. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to predict violent behavior.

RESULTS:
Current substance use (CSU) rather than lifetime SUD was found to be related to violent behavior in patients with BD, and CSU was associated with a threefold increase in the risk of violence. The rate of lifetime SUD in our sample was 59%, and the rate of CSU was 39%. The most commonly abused substances were cannabis and alcohol, followed by synthetic cannabinoids, in both groups of patients with lifetime SUD and CSU. Individuals abusing any substance were more likely to have a criminal record and history of incarceration than other patients. One of the most significant risk factors for violence was a previous history of violent behavior.

LIMITATIONS:
The sample was limited to male patients. Data on some participants' recent substance use from standard urine analysis was not obtained. The data on the use of synthetic cannabinoids was obtained from patients and their families owing to the lack of equipment for detecting synthetic cannabinoids using laboratory analysis.

CONCLUSIONS:
CSU appears to be a significant predictive factor in violent behavior in male patients. Further investigation of co-occurrence of violence with CSU and improvement in treatment strategies might reduce or prevent violence in patients with BD.

Purchase full article at:   http://goo.gl/MupCwd

  • 1Bakırköy Prof. Dr. Mazhar Osman Training and Research Hospital for Psychiatry, Neurology and Neurosurgery, Turkey. Electronic address: dr_izgi@hotmail.com.
  • 2Bakırköy Prof. Dr. Mazhar Osman Training and Research Hospital for Psychiatry, Neurology and Neurosurgery, Turkey. Electronic address: muraterkiran@gmail.com.
  • 3İstanbul Gelişim University, Department of Psychology, Turkey. Electronic address: elifmutlu@yahoo.com.
  •  2015 Dec 30;193:89-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.12.059. 





Thursday, December 3, 2015

Cognitive Impairment in Manic Bipolar Patients: Important, Understated, Significant Aspects

BACKGROUND:
Bipolar disorder is a chronic mood disorder with episodic progress and high relapse rate. Growing evidence suggests that individuals with bipolar disorder display cognitive impairment which persists even throughout periods of symptom's remission.

METHOD:
137 bipolar patients met the inclusion criteria (depressive episode: DSM-IV-TR criteria for major depressive episode, HAMD score ≥17; manic/hypomanic episode: DSM-IV-TR criteria for manic/hypomanic episode, YMRS score ≥12, euthymic: 6 months of remission, HAMD score ≤8, YMRS score ≤6; and mixed: DSM-IV-TR criteria for mixed episode, HAMD score >8 and YMRS score >6) and were therefore enrolled in the study. Patients were free of psychotic symptoms (hallucinations/delusions) at the moment of testing. Control group consisted of 62 healthy subjects without history of neurological and/or psychiatric disorder. Cognitive battery has been applied in order to assess verbal memory, working memory, psychomotor speed, verbal fluency, attention and speed of information processing, and executive function. Following data were collected: demographics, psychiatric history, age of illness onset; current and previous treatment (including hospitalizations). Cognitive deficits were assessed in bipolar patients experiencing manic, depressive, mixed episodes or who were euthymic in mood. Results were compared between the subgroups and with healthy individuals. The association of impaired cognition with illness course was analyzed.

RESULTS:
Bipolar patients showed cognitive deficits in all evaluated domains when compared to controls. The lowest scores were obtained for the verbal fluency test. After adjusting for current episode, manic subgroup showed greater cognitive impairment in verbal and working memory, executive function/reasoning and problem solving, compared to depressive, mixed, and euthymic subgroup. Low-neurocognitive performance was directly associated with a predominance of manic episodes and severe course of bipolar illness. An increased number of past manic episodes was the strongest correlated event with the poorest outcomes in verbal memory testing. Other factors correlated with poor verbal memory scores in manic subgroup were age at illness onset (positive correlation), illness length, and hospitalizations (negative correlations).

CONCLUSIONS:
Bipolar patients showed cognitive deficits regardless of the phase of illness. Subjects experiencing a manic episode displayed higher deficits in verbal and working memory, executive function/reasoning, and problem solving. Severe course of illness also showed significant contribution in terms of cognitive impairment.

Full article at:  http://goo.gl/VEQEWB

  • 1University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Hatieganu" Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania ; 7th Ward, Clinical Hospital of Psychiatry "Al. Obregia" Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
  • 27th Ward, Clinical Hospital of Psychiatry "Al. Obregia" Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania ; University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila" Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
  • 3University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila" Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania ; 9th Ward, Clinical Hospital of Psychiatry "Al. Obregia" Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
  • 4University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila" Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania ; Department of Cardiology, Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
  • 5Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, "Danubius" University, Galati, Romania ; Clinical Hospital of Psychiatry "Elisabeta Doamna" Galati, Galati, Romania.
  • 6University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Hatieganu" Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania ; Second Psychiatric Clinic, Emergency County Hospital Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. 


Friday, November 20, 2015

Epidemiology of DSM-5 Drug Use Disorder: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III

IMPORTANCE:
Current information on the prevalence and sociodemographic and clinical profiles of individuals in the general population with DSM-5 drug use disorder (DUD) is limited. Given the present societal and economic context in the United States and the new diagnostic system, up-to-date national information is needed from a single uniform data source.

OBJECTIVE:
To present nationally representative findings on the prevalence, correlates, psychiatric comorbidity, disability, and treatment of DSM-5 DUD diagnoses overall and by severity level.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:
In-person interviews were conducted with 36 309 adults in the 2012-2013 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III, a cross-sectional representative survey of the United States. The household response rate was 72%; person-level response rate, 84%; and overall response rate, 60.1%. Data were collected April 2012 through June 2013 and analyzed from February through March 2015.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES:
Twelve-month and lifetime DUD, based on amphetamine, cannabis, club drug, cocaine, hallucinogen, heroin, nonheroin opioid, sedative/tranquilizer, and/or solvent/inhalant use disorders.

RESULTS:
Prevalences of 12-month and lifetime DUD were 3.9% and 9.9%, respectively. Drug use disorder was generally greater among men, white and Native American individuals, younger and previously or never married adults, those with lower education and income, and those residing in the West. Significant associations were found between 12-month and lifetime DUD and other substance use disorders. Significant associations were also found between any 12-month DUD and major depressive disorder, dysthymia, bipolar I, posttraumatic stress disorder, and antisocial, borderline, and schizotypal personality disorders. Similar associations were found for any lifetime DUD with the exception that lifetime DUD was also associated with generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, and social phobia. Twelve-month DUD was associated with significant disability, increasing with DUD severity. Among respondents with 12-month and lifetime DUD, only 13.5% and 24.6% received treatment, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE:
DSM-5 DUD is a common, highly comorbid, and disabling disorder that largely goes untreated in the United States. These findings indicate the need for additional studies to understand the broad relationships in more detail; estimate present-day economic costs of DUDs; investigate hypotheses regarding etiology, chronicity, and treatment use; and provide information to policy makers about allocation of resources for service delivery and research. Findings also indicate an urgent need to destigmatize DUD and educate the public, clinicians, and policy makers about its treatment to encourage affected individuals to obtain help.

Purchase full article at:  http://goo.gl/cxGq1a

  • 1Laboratory of Epidemiology and Biometry, Division of Intramural Clinical and Biological Research, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland.
  • 2Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons and Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York3New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York. 


Sunday, July 26, 2015

Impact of Cannabis Use on Long-Term Remission in Bipolar I and Schizoaffective Disorder

Read at: http://ht.ly/Q6tDn HT @Deakin 

Regular cannabis use has a negative effect on the clinical course of bipolar spectrum disorders. Individuals with bipolar spectrum disorders who are regular cannabis users are a vulnerable population.Given the clinical significance of cannabis use in bipolar spectrum disorders, routine comprehensive and regular assessments of cannabis use are recommended. Furthermore, special attention to, and management of, patients with these substance problems must be integrated into the treatment strategy to achieve better therapeutic outcomes for bipolar spectrum disorders.

Below:  Comparison of remission rates according to cannabis and tobacco use. Bar indicates median and interquartile range. *p-value<0.05, **p-value<0.01 (statistically significant after the Bonferroni correction). HAMD-21: 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, YMRS: Young Mania Rating scale.