Showing posts with label Emerging Adults. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Emerging Adults. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 8, 2016

Number of Sexual Partners and Relationship Status Are Associated with Unprotected Sex Across Emerging Adulthood

Sex with multiple partners, consecutively or concurrently, is a risk factor for contracting sexually transmitted infections (STIs) as multiple partner-partner contacts present increased opportunity for transmission. It is unclear, however, if individuals who tend to have more partners also use protection less reliably than those with sexual histories of fewer partners. 

Longitudinal data can elucidate whether an individual shows a consistent pattern of sex with multiple partners. We used latent class growth analyses to examine emerging adult survey data (N = 2244) spanning 10 waves of assessment across 6 years. 

We identified three trajectory classes described with respect to number of partners as 
  1. Multiple, 
  2. Single, and 
  3. Rare. 
Trajectory group, relationship status, and their interactions were tested as predictors of using protection against STIs and pregnancy at each wave. 

The Multiple Partners class had the greatest odds ratio of reporting sex without protection against STIs and pregnancy, followed by the Single and Rare classes. Exclusive relationship status was a risk factor for unprotected sex at earlier waves, but a protective factor at most later waves. There was no significant interaction between relationship status and trajectory class in predicting use of protection. The Multiple Partners class reported more permissive values on sex and an elevated proportion of homosexual behavior. This group overlaps with an already identified at-risk population, men who have sex with men. 

Potential mechanisms explaining the increased risk for sex without protection, including communication, risk assessment, and co-occurring risk behaviors are discussed as targets for intervention.

Purchase full article at:   http://goo.gl/dPJjdy

  • 1Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station, A8000, Austin, TX, 78712, USA. james.ashenhurst@utexas.edu.
  • 2Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station, A8000, Austin, TX, 78712, USA. 
  •  2016 Mar 3.



Saturday, December 19, 2015

Social Networks & Substance Use among At-Risk Emerging Adults Living in Disadvantaged Urban Areas in the Southern U.S.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS:
Substance use and risk-taking are common during emerging adulthood, a transitional period when peer influences often increase and family influences decrease. Investigating relationships between social network features and substance use can inform community-based prevention programs. This study investigated whether substance use among emerging adults living in disadvantaged urban areas was influenced by peer and family social network messages that variously encouraged and discouraged substance use.

DESIGN:
Cross-sectional, naturalistic field study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS:
Lower-income neighborhoods in Birmingham, Alabama, USA with 344 participants (110 males, 234 females, ages 15-25 years; mean = 18.86 years), recruited via respondent-driven sampling.

MEASUREMENTS:
During structured interviews conducted in community locations, the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test assessed substance use and related problems. Predictor variables were network characteristics, including presence of substance-using peers, messages from friends and family members about substance use and network sources for health information.

FINDINGS:
Higher substance involvement was associated with friend and family encouragement of use and having close peer network members who used substances (Ps < 0.001). Peer discouragement of substance use was associated with reduced risk (b = - 1.46, P < 0.05), whereas family discouragement had no protective association.

CONCLUSIONS:
Social networks appear to be important in both promoting and preventing substance use in disadvantaged young adults in the United States.

Purchase full article at:   http://goo.gl/fUx8pK

  • 1University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • 2School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.