More and via: http://goo.gl/uE1k8Y
Showing posts with label Police Accountability. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Police Accountability. Show all posts
Sunday, March 27, 2016
Sunday, March 20, 2016
Social Movements Against Racist Police Brutality and Department of Justice Intervention in Prince George's County, Maryland
Racist police brutality has
been systemic in Prince George's County, Maryland. The victims include African
Americans, the mentally challenged, and immigrant populations, creating a
complex and uneven public health impact. Three threads characterize the social
movements and intervention since 1970.
First, a significant demographic shift occurred as African Americans became the majority population in the late 1980s when the first Black county executive was elected in 1994. Despite the change in political leadership, police brutality remained rampant. Lower-income households located close to the District of Columbia and "inside the beltway" experienced the most police brutality.
In 2001, The Washington Post revealed that between 1990 and 2000, Prince George's police shot and killed more citizens per officer than any of the 50 largest city and county law enforcement agencies in the country, 84 % of whom were black. Of the 147 persons shot during the 1990s, 12 were mentally and/or emotionally disturbed; 6 of these shootings were fatal.
Second, resistance to police brutality emerged in a variety of political formations throughout the period, especially in the late 1990s. Sustained community pressure prompted the Department of Justice (DOJ) to open a civil rights investigation of the police department in November 2000. To avoid a potential federal lawsuit, the county leadership negotiated a memorandum of agreement (MOA) with the DOJ to enact policy reforms, part of which called for supplementing the departmental mobile crisis team, comprised of mental health care professionals, to respond to all cases involving mentally challenged citizens.
Third, the incomplete process of change subsequent to the ending of DOJ oversight suggests a continued challenge to social movements opposing police brutality. This study focuses on the effectiveness of the MOA along with the activism of the People's Coalition for Police Accountability (PCPA) in reforming a culture of police brutality. The intensive oversight by the DOJ, combined with engaged resident activism, reduced the incidences of police brutality during the period 2004-2013.
Since the termination of DOJ oversight, disturbing developments suggest the need for continued and sustained activism. Since 2010, county police officers have fatally shot 21 people, several in questionable circumstances.
At the same time, the Prince George's Police Department has received more tactical military weaponry than any other jurisdiction in the state of Maryland under the 1033 program of the National Defense Authorization Act.
First, a significant demographic shift occurred as African Americans became the majority population in the late 1980s when the first Black county executive was elected in 1994. Despite the change in political leadership, police brutality remained rampant. Lower-income households located close to the District of Columbia and "inside the beltway" experienced the most police brutality.
In 2001, The Washington Post revealed that between 1990 and 2000, Prince George's police shot and killed more citizens per officer than any of the 50 largest city and county law enforcement agencies in the country, 84 % of whom were black. Of the 147 persons shot during the 1990s, 12 were mentally and/or emotionally disturbed; 6 of these shootings were fatal.
Second, resistance to police brutality emerged in a variety of political formations throughout the period, especially in the late 1990s. Sustained community pressure prompted the Department of Justice (DOJ) to open a civil rights investigation of the police department in November 2000. To avoid a potential federal lawsuit, the county leadership negotiated a memorandum of agreement (MOA) with the DOJ to enact policy reforms, part of which called for supplementing the departmental mobile crisis team, comprised of mental health care professionals, to respond to all cases involving mentally challenged citizens.
Third, the incomplete process of change subsequent to the ending of DOJ oversight suggests a continued challenge to social movements opposing police brutality. This study focuses on the effectiveness of the MOA along with the activism of the People's Coalition for Police Accountability (PCPA) in reforming a culture of police brutality. The intensive oversight by the DOJ, combined with engaged resident activism, reduced the incidences of police brutality during the period 2004-2013.
Since the termination of DOJ oversight, disturbing developments suggest the need for continued and sustained activism. Since 2010, county police officers have fatally shot 21 people, several in questionable circumstances.
At the same time, the Prince George's Police Department has received more tactical military weaponry than any other jurisdiction in the state of Maryland under the 1033 program of the National Defense Authorization Act.
Purchase full article at: http://goo.gl/8xSskR
By: Hutto JW Sr1, Green RD2.
- 1Howard University, Washington, DC, USA.
- 2Howard University, Washington, DC, USA. rgreen@howard.edu.
- J Urban Health. 2016 Feb 16.
More at: https://twitter.com/hiv insight
Thursday, March 10, 2016
Building on the Evidence: Guiding Policy and Research on Police Encounters with Persons with Mental Illnesses
...During this time of national concern about excessive use of
force by police, a range of stakeholders—including communities, federal and
state governments, and law enforcement—seek improvements in community
partnership, accountability, transparency, and skillful restraint to begin
reversing the problems of excessive police use of force, including as they
affect persons with mental illnesses. Prevention-oriented policies and programs
that offer tools for improving de-escalation of potentially dangerous
encounters with persons in a mental-health crisis could help minimize risk for
injury during police encounters for all parties involved and reduce the
likelihood that force will be needed at all. As an example, a recent trend in
state law making broadens police authority to remove guns from persons who are
considered to be in danger of harming themselves or others but who have not committed
a criminal act and are not prohibited from gun ownership. Connecticut, Indiana,
and California are three states with different versions of a law in place to
remove guns from potentially dangerous persons. A benefit of this policy
approach to managing potential dangerousness among persons in crisis is in
removing the focus from mental illnesses per se and placing it instead on
demonstrated behaviors by any member of the community that suggest heightened
risk. This conceptual and operational shift in focus from mental illnesses to
dangerousness is important for reducing stigma around mental illnesses, both in
the community and among law enforcement officers.
There has also been increased awareness in law
enforcement communities of the need for more in-depth officer training in
de-escalation. The New York Times reported
on a recent survey conducted by the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF) that
highlighted the tradition of a disproportionate focus on training in use of
force rather than de-escalation techniques and estimated the following median
number of hours spent in various training areas: firearms = 58 hours, defensive
tactics = 49 hours, de-escalation = 8 hours, and crisis intervention = 8 hours (Apuzzo,
2015). PERF asserted that some large police departments support the
idea of a new approach to training that focuses more heavily on teaching
officers the necessary skills to defuse tense situations and avoid violent
confrontations; but other departments are resistant. Persons with mental
illnesses would undoubtedly benefit during their encounters with police who had
more comprehensive training in de-escalation and potentially reduce their
chances not only of injury during those encounters but also of being subject to
police use of force at all.
Certain jurisdictions have had strong success in
implementing prevention-oriented models that include specialized officer
response to persons with mental illnesses like CIT. Other successful additions
to the community infrastructure provide officers with an alternative to taking
a person in crisis to the emergency department or jail. San Antonio, Texas,
paired CIT training with a newly constructed Restoration Center, a facility
with a 16-bed psychiatric unit, a medical clinic, and a “sobering room” where
police can drop off people who are intoxicated rather than taking them to jail.
The city reports related savings for the police department of $600,000 a year
in overtime pay alone; undoubtedly, many encounters that would have involved
use offorce and possible injury were averted.
Morabito
and Socia (2015) also call for policy improvements in
consistency, quality, and availability of data on encounters during which
police use force and the surrounding circumstances, including measures that
thoroughly describe the circumstances of a person’s mental-health crisis. While
a range of community and government stakeholders are engaged, now is an
especially important time to develop and institute progressive policies in an
effort to increase accountability for what takes place during police
encounters. New policies that require detailed reporting of police use-of-force
incidents would also facilitate further rigorous research on the effectiveness
of CIT, preemptive gun seizure laws, and other approaches to mitigating
dangerousness in encounters with persons in mental-health crisis. To ensure
that new reporting policies are sustainable, however, jurisdictions would need
to give careful consideration to issues around their implementation. Challenges
to be addressed include the acceptability of such policies among police
department leadership and their officers, as well as the feasibility of
additional reporting and paperwork for officers and data management for
administration.
Morabito
and Socia (2015) offer salient new evidence about risk
for injury during police encounters involving persons with mental illnesses in
which force is used. Their study lays a foundation for further research that
should extend to include non-CIT police officers to learn more about both
CIT-specific outcomes and any unobserved elevated risk for injury during police
encounters with persons with mental illnesses. Policy response to these
concerns can begin now, starting with improved reporting on police encounters
with persons with mental illnesses and a rigorous focus on building officers’
skills in de-escalation...
Full article at: http://goo.gl/DaHZ0u
By: Allison G. Robertson,
Direct correspondence to Allison G. Robertson, Department of
Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine,
Brightleaf Square, Ste 23B, Durham, NC 27701 (Email: allison.gilbert@duke.edu).
Allison G. Robertson is
an assistant professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
at Duke University School of Medicine. She received a Ph.D. in health policy
and management from the University of North Carolina—Chapel Hill and an MPH in
health management and policy from the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor.
Professor Robertson conducts mental health law, policy, and services research,
with a particular focus on the problem of criminal justice involvement among
adults with serious mental illnesses. She is currently the principal
investigator on a study of gender differences in a statewide jail-diversion
program, principal investigator on a study of medication-assisted treatment for
justice-involved adults with co-occurring mental health and substance use
disorders, and an investigator on two multisite studies on gun control laws,
mental illness, and prevention of violence.
Tuesday, January 26, 2016
Deaths Resulting from the Use of Firearms by Police Against Motor Vehicles: Study of Cases in Porto, Portugal
Highlights
- Bullets that struck the occupants were FMJ type and exhibited a deformed structure but no significant loss of mass.
- Entry holes in the victim's body were larger than the calibre of bullets.
- Death occurred immediately after the victim was shot only in one case, despite a vital structure has been hit in all cases.
The firearms used were 7.65 mm (n = 1) or 9 mm
(n = 3) calibre semi-automatic pistols and 9 mm calibre
submachine guns (n = 2); the bullets were full metal jacket type. The
metal jacket of the collected projectiles was totally or partially destroyed in
3 cases. It exhibited a deformed structure in all cases. The trajectories of
the bullets in the vehicles were always more or less linear, even when initial
impact was at an oblique angle. The entry holes in the victims' bodies were
larger or much larger in size than the calibre of the bullets. They were
located, with the exception of one of the cases, in the left half of the body.
The trajectories in the victims' bodies were from front to back, in one case,
and from back to front in all others. Exit wounds were only found in two cases.
Death occurred immediately after the victim was shot only in one case, despite
a vital structure has been hit in all cases.
The cases studied support the idea
that the use of firearms against vehicles with the sole intention of
immobilisation entails uncontrollable danger to the lives of the occupants, and
especially when done by police forces not specifically trained for that
purpose. Therefore, such use of firearms should be avoided.
Purchase full article at: http://goo.gl/6YegLZ
By: Rodrigues E1, Faria P2, Santos A3, Fraga S4.
- 1Faculty of Medicine of Porto University, Department of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences, Alameda Professor Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal. Electronic address: ezrodrigues@gmail.com.
- 2Faculty of Law of Catholic University of Portugal, Rua Diogo Botelho, 1327, 4160-005, Porto, Portugal.
- 3National Institute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences, Department of Pathology - North Branch, Jardim Carrilho Videira, 4050-167, Porto, Portugal; Faculty of Medicine of Porto University, Department of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences, Alameda Professor Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal; School of Health Sciences of Minho University, Campus Gualtar, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal; Center of Forensic Sciences, National Institute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences, Largo da Sé Nova, 3000-213, Coimbra, Portugal.
- 4EPIUnit - Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Rua das Taipas, 135, 4050-600, Porto, Portugal.
- J Forensic Leg Med. 2016 Jan 12;39:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2016.01.010.
More at: https://twitter.com/hiv insight
Monday, January 11, 2016
Thursday, December 31, 2015
Cultural Competence Training for Law Enforcement Responding to Domestic Violence Emergencies with the Deaf & Hard of Hearing
OBJECTIVE:
METHOD:
RESULTS:
CONCLUSION:
Purchase full article at: http://goo.gl/3iDu3X
By: Engelman A1, Deardorff J2.
- 1California State University, East Bay, CA, USA alina.engelman@csueastbay.edu.
- 2University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
More at: https://twitter.com/hiv
insight
Monday, December 28, 2015
Wednesday, December 23, 2015
Stop, Question, and Complain: Citizen Grievances Against the NYPD and the Opacity of Police Stops Across New York City Precincts, 2007-2013
Data on police stops can be
examined to reflect on the relative "opacity" of these encounters and
how aggregate patterns on the nature-not just the volume-of reported stops
relate to public scrutiny of the police.
We hypothesize that public scrutiny on
police stops is positively related to the prevalence of opaque stop practices
across dimensions of "intrusiveness," "rationale," and
"setting" derived from agency records. We further argue that this
relationship is influenced by neighborhood conditions in the form of
concentrated disadvantage, residential instability, and heterogeneity.
To
develop these ideas, we draw on a publicly available NYPD dataset on police
stops to specify a series of fixed and random effects models that describe
variation in recorded stop practices across precincts (N = 74) and overtime
(T = 7, 2007-2013). We relate these practices to neighborhood conditions
derived from the Census and examine their association with rates of SQF
complaints to the CCRB.
Results show considerable variation in indicators of
opacity, particularly across precincts. More importantly, we also find that
rates of complaints are higher in precincts that have more vaguely defined,
intrusive stops.
Results also suggest that concentrated disadvantage is
independently and positively related with higher rates of public scrutiny of
the police.
Purchase full article at: http://goo.gl/n0myhu
By: Rengifo AF1, Fowler K2.
1School of Criminal Justice, Rutgers University, 123
Washington St, Suite 554, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA. arengifo@rutgers.edu.
2School of Criminal Justice, Rutgers University, 123
Washington St, Suite 554, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA. kurt.fowler@rutgers.edu.
More at: https://twitter.com/hiv_insight
Wednesday, December 16, 2015
Politics, Police Accountability, and Public Health: Civilian Review in Newark, New Jersey
Police brutality, a
longstanding civil rights issue, has returned to the forefront of American
public debate. A growing body of public health research shows that excessive
use of force by police and racial profiling have adverse effects on health for
African Americans and other marginalized groups. Yet, interventions to monitor
unlawful policing have been met with fierce opposition at the federal, state,
and local levels.
On April 30, 2015, the mayor of Newark, New Jersey signed an
executive order establishing a Civilian Complaint Review Board (CCRB) to
monitor the Newark Police Department (NPD). Using a mixed-methods approach,
this study examined how advocates and government actors accomplished this
recent policy change in the face of police opposition and after a 50-year
history of unsuccessful attempts in Newark.
Drawing on official public
documents, news media, and interviews conducted in April and May 2015, I
propose that: (1) a Department of Justice investigation of the NPD, (2) the
activist background of the Mayor and his relationships with community
organizations, and (3) the momentum provided by the national Black Lives Matter
movement were pivotal in overcoming political obstacles to reform. Examining
the history of CCRB adoption in Newark suggests when and where advocates may
intervene to promote policing reforms in other US cities.
Purchase full article at: http://goo.gl/ZSvJcU
By: McGregor A1.
- 1Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA. aleciam@princeton.edu.
More at: https://twitter.com/hiv_insight
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


