Showing posts with label racism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label racism. Show all posts

Monday, March 28, 2016

Understanding Associations between Religious Beliefs and White Privilege Attitudes

Scholars have grappled with how religion in the United States shapes attitudes toward racial inequality, often by focusing on racial inequality as out-group disadvantage. 

The current study extends this research by moving beyond racial inequality as out-group disadvantage to examine how religious conservatism and sanctification of social justice (i.e., attributing spiritual or religious significance to working for social justice) are associated with attitudes toward racial in-group advantage: white privilege. 

Using canonical correlation analysis with 475 white Catholic and Protestant students, results showed religious beliefs and white privilege attitudes were connected in two ways: 
  1. sanctification of social justice was positively associated with a dimension defined by greater willingness to confront white privilege and greater white privilege remorse and awareness and 
  2. religious conservatism was negatively associated with a dimension defined by greater awareness of white privilege. 
This shows how religion may facilitate or inhibit awareness and action related to white privilege.

Full PDF article at:   https://goo.gl/xIArSw  Abstract:  http://goo.gl/QVbqke

1University of Illinois Urbana–Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA
2DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA
Nathan R. Todd, Department of Psychology, University of Illinois Urbana–Champaign, 603 East Daniel Street, Champaign, IL 61820, USA. Email: ntodd2@illinois.edu




Sunday, March 27, 2016

White Supremacy vs White Privilege in Environmental Racism Research

In this report I compare two forms of racism: white privilege and white supremacy. I examine how they are distinct and can be seen in the environmental racism arena. 

I argue that within US geographic scholarship white privilege has become so widespread that more aggressive forms of racism, such as white supremacy, are often overlooked. It is essential that we understand the precise dynamics that produce environmental injustice so that we can accurately target the responsible parties via strategic social movements and campaigns. Using the case of Exide Technologies in Vernon, California, I argue that the hazards generated by its longstanding regulatory noncompliance are a form of white supremacy.

Full PDF article at:  http://goo.gl/CyiAeT  Abstract:  http://goo.gl/ITckh1

By:  Laura Pulido, American Studies & Ethnicity, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.




Deny, Distance, or Dismantle? How White Americans Manage a Privileged Identity

Social scientists have traditionally argued that whiteness-the attribute of being recognized and treated as a White person in society-is powerful because it is invisible. On this view, members of the racially dominant group have the unique luxury of rarely noticing their race or the privileges it confers. 

This article challenges this "invisibility thesis," arguing that Whites frequently regard themselves as racial actors. We further argue that whiteness defines a problematic social identity that confronts Whites with 2 psychological threats: the possibility that their accomplishments in life were not fully earned (meritocratic threat) and the association with a group that benefits from unfair social advantages (group-image threat). We theorize that Whites manage their racial identity to dispel these threats. 

According to our deny, distance, or dismantle (3D) model of White identity management, dominant-group members have three strategies at their disposal: deny the existence of privilege, distance their own self-concepts from the White category, or strive to dismantle systems of privilege. Whereas denial and distancing promote insensitivity and inaction with respect to racial inequality, dismantling reduces threat by relinquishing privileges. 

We suggest that interventions aimed at reducing inequality should attempt to leverage dismantling as a strategy of White identity management.

Purchase full article at:   http://goo.gl/AMUToK

  • 1New York University eric.knowles@nyu.edu.
  • 2Stanford University.
  • 3Carnegie Mellon University.
  • 4University of California, Los Angeles. 
  •  2014 Nov;9(6):594-609. doi: 10.1177/1745691614554658.



Saturday, March 26, 2016

An Empirical Analysis of White Privilege, Social Position and Health

Accumulated evidence has demonstrated that social position matters for health. Those with greater socioeconomic resources and greater perceived standing in the social hierarchy have better health than those with fewer resources and lower perceived standing. Race is another salient axis by which health is stratified in the U.S., but few studies have examined the benefit of White privilege

In this paper, we investigated how perceptions of inequality and subjective and objective social status affected the health and well-being of N = 630 White residents in three Boston neighborhoods lying on a social gradient differentiated by race, ethnicity, income and prestige. Outcomes were self-rated health, dental health, and happiness. Results suggested that: neighborhood residence was not associated with health after controlling for individual level factors (e.g., positive ratings of the neighborhood, education level); objective measures of socioeconomic status were associated with better self-reported and dental health, but subjective assessments of social position were more strongly associated; and White residents living in the two wealthiest neighborhoods, and who perceived Black families as welcome in their neighborhoods enjoyed better health than those who believed them to be less welcome. However, those who lived in the least wealthy and most diverse neighborhood fared worse when reporting Black families to be welcome. 

These results suggest that White privilege and relative social position interact to shape health outcomes.

Below:  Relationship between perceived neighborhood welcome to Black families and health outcomes (self-rated health, dental health, and happiness). Values for self-rated health ranged from 1 to 4; dental health from 1 to 5; and happiness from 0 to 2. For both self-rated health and dental health, lower scores are better.





Full article at:   http://goo.gl/V2gSZ3

By:  Kwate NO1Goodman MS2.
  • 1Departments of Human Ecology and Africana Studies, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 55 Dudley Rd, Cook Office Building, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8520, USA. Electronic address: nokwate@rci.rutgers.edu.
  • 2Division of Public Health Sciences Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8100, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. 
  •  2014 Sep;116:150-60. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.05.041. Epub 2014 Jun 13.



Sunday, March 20, 2016

Social Movements Against Racist Police Brutality and Department of Justice Intervention in Prince George's County, Maryland

Racist police brutality has been systemic in Prince George's County, Maryland. The victims include African Americans, the mentally challenged, and immigrant populations, creating a complex and uneven public health impact. Three threads characterize the social movements and intervention since 1970. 

First, a significant demographic shift occurred as African Americans became the majority population in the late 1980s when the first Black county executive was elected in 1994. Despite the change in political leadership, police brutality remained rampant. Lower-income households located close to the District of Columbia and "inside the beltway" experienced the most police brutality. 

In 2001, The Washington Post revealed that between 1990 and 2000, Prince George's police shot and killed more citizens per officer than any of the 50 largest city and county law enforcement agencies in the country, 84 % of whom were black. Of the 147 persons shot during the 1990s, 12 were mentally and/or emotionally disturbed; 6 of these shootings were fatal. 

Second, resistance to police brutality emerged in a variety of political formations throughout the period, especially in the late 1990s. Sustained community pressure prompted the Department of Justice (DOJ) to open a civil rights investigation of the police department in November 2000. To avoid a potential federal lawsuit, the county leadership negotiated a memorandum of agreement (MOA) with the DOJ to enact policy reforms, part of which called for supplementing the departmental mobile crisis team, comprised of mental health care professionals, to respond to all cases involving mentally challenged citizens. 

Third, the incomplete process of change subsequent to the ending of DOJ oversight suggests a continued challenge to social movements opposing police brutality. This study focuses on the effectiveness of the MOA along with the activism of the People's Coalition for Police Accountability (PCPA) in reforming a culture of police brutality. The intensive oversight by the DOJ, combined with engaged resident activism, reduced the incidences of police brutality during the period 2004-2013. 

Since the termination of DOJ oversight, disturbing developments suggest the need for continued and sustained activism. Since 2010, county police officers have fatally shot 21 people, several in questionable circumstances. 

At the same time, the Prince George's Police Department has received more tactical military weaponry than any other jurisdiction in the state of Maryland under the 1033 program of the National Defense Authorization Act.

Purchase full article at:   http://goo.gl/8xSskR

By:    Hutto JW Sr1Green RD2.
  • 1Howard University, Washington, DC, USA.
  • 2Howard University, Washington, DC, USA. rgreen@howard.edu. 
  •  2016 Feb 16.



Monday, January 18, 2016

Structural Equation Modeling of the Effects of Racism, LGBTQ Discrimination & Internalized Oppression on Illicit Drug Use in LGBTQ People of Color

BACKGROUND:
Experiences with lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer (LGBTQ) discrimination and racism have both been associated with mental health problems and illicit drug use. However, the cumulative effects of both forms of discrimination-and resulting internalized oppression-on illicit drug use in LGBTQ people of color (POC) has not been examined in the research literature.

METHODS:
Using online questionnaires, this study collected self-report data from 200 LGBTQ POC about their experiences with racism, LGBTQ discrimination, internalized racism, internalized LGBTQ discrimination, and illicit drug use.

RESULTS:
Two structural equation models yielded adequate fit indices in which experiences with racism and LGBTQ discrimination led to more internalized oppression, which then led to greater illicit drug use magnitude. LGBTQ discrimination was directly related to increased internalized oppression, which was positively associated with illicit drug use magnitude; the relationship between LGBTQ discrimination and illicit drug use magnitude was mediated by internalized oppression in both models. However, racism and the interaction between racism and LGBTQ discrimination did not show valid direct effects on internalized oppression or indirect effects on illicit drug use magnitude.

CONCLUSIONS:
LGBTQ POC can be the targets of both racism and LGBTQ discrimination, although the current study found that the most psychologically damaging effects may come from LGBTQ discrimination. Interventions meant to decrease or prevent illicit drug use in LGBTQ POC may benefit from helping participants examine the links among LGBTQ discrimination, internalized oppression, and illicit drug use as a coping strategy, focusing on substituting more adaptive coping.

Purchase full article at:   http://goo.gl/b2d6eK

  • 1Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, 810 W. Franklin Street, P.O. Box 842018, Richmond, VA 23284-2018, United States.
  • 2Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, 810 W. Franklin Street, P.O. Box 842018, Richmond, VA 23284-2018, United States. Electronic address: pperrin@vcu.edu. 
  •  2016 Jan 4. pii: S0376-8716(15)01844-X. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.12.029.





Sunday, January 3, 2016

Stress and Coping with Racism and Their Role in Sexual Risk for HIV among African American, Asian/Pacific Islander, and Latino Men Who Have Sex with Men

The deleterious effects of racism on a wide range of health outcomes, including HIV risk, are well documented among racial/ethnic minority groups in the United States. However, little is known about how men of color who have sex with men (MSM) cope with stress from racism and whether the coping strategies they employ buffer against the impact of racism on sexual risk for HIV transmission. 

We examined associations of stress and coping with racism with unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) in a sample of African American (N = 403), Asian/Pacific Islander (N = 393), and Latino (N = 400) MSM recruited in Los Angeles County, CA during 2008-2009. Almost two-thirds (65 %) of the sample reported being stressed as a consequence of racism experienced within the gay community. 

Overall, 51 % of the sample reported having UAI in the prior 6 months. After controlling for race/ethnicity, age, nativity, marital status, sexual orientation, education, HIV serostatus, and lifetime history of incarceration, the multivariate analysis found statistically significant main effects of stress from racism and avoidance coping on UAI; no statistically significant main effects of dismissal, education/confrontation, and social-support seeking were observed. None of the interactions of stress with the four coping measures were statistically significant. Although stress from racism within the gay community increased the likelihood of engaging in UAI among MSM of color, we found little evidence that coping responses to racism buffered stress from racism. Instead, avoidance coping appears to suggest an increase in UAI. 

Below:  Stress from Racism Experienced in the Gay Community, by Race/Ethnicity (%)



Below:  Coping Strategies Employed to Deal with Racism, by Race/Ethnicity: Mean Scale Scores1
1. Range: 1 = “strongly disagree” to 4 = “strongly agree”



Full article at:   http://goo.gl/78mRbc



Friday, November 20, 2015

Re-Search: The Missing Pieces in Investigating African-American Relationship Dynamics and Implications for HIV Risk

African-Americans account for roughly 14% of the population, yet comprise 44% of new HIV/AIDS infections in the United States (). 

These numbers represent a grave health disparity where African-Americans bear a disproportionate brunt of the HIV/AIDS epidemic. While much of the funding for research in HIV prevention among African-Americans remains focused on the MSM (men who have sex with men) population, heterosexual African-Americans have been left with little direction for effectively confronting this epidemic. 

Furthermore, most prevention messaging is focused at the individual-level, encouraging mutual monogamy and consistent condom use ( ). However, placing onus solely on the individual is problematic as ; there are structural and community-level factors that complicate an individual's ability to substantially reduce their risk. 

Here, we make a call for conducting studies that more comprehensively examine the historical, societal, structural, and community-level factors that affect African-American heterosexual relationships, perpetuating increased risk for HIV/AIDS infection in this group.

Full article at:  http://goo.gl/xAxdXf

National Development and Research Institutes
 





Wednesday, October 21, 2015

Racism at the Intersections: Gender & Socioeconomic Differences in the Experience of Racism among African Americans

Several studies investigating the health effects of racism have reported gender and socioeconomic differences in exposures to racism, with women typically reporting lower frequencies, and individuals with greater resources reporting higher frequencies. 

This study used diverse measures of socioeconomic position and multiple measures and methods to assess experienced racism. Socioeconomic position included education and financial and employment status. Quantitative racism measures assessed individual experiences with day-to-day and with major lifetime incidents and perceptions of the extent to which African Americans as a group experience racism. 

A brief qualitative question asked respondents to describe a racist incident that stood out in recent memory. Participants comprised a probability sample of N = 144 African American adults aged 19 to 87 residing in New York City. Results suggested that women reported fewer lifetime incidents but did not differ from men on everyday racism. These differences appear to be partly because of scale content. 

Socioeconomic position as measured by years of education was positively associated with reported racism in the total sample but differently patterned across gender; subjective social status showed a negative association. Qualitative responses describing memorable incidents fell into 5 key categories: resources/opportunity structures, criminal profiling, racial aggression/assault, interpersonal incivilities, and stereotyping. In these narratives, men were more likely to offer accounts involving criminal profiling, and women encountered incivilities more often. 

The findings highlight the need for closer attention to the intersection of gender and socioeconomic factors in investigations of the health effects of racism.

Purchase full article at: http://goo.gl/jXgPur

By: Kwate NO1Goodman MS2.
  • 1Department of Human Ecology.
  • 2Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine.  


Sunday, October 4, 2015

Social Oppression, Psychological Vulnerability & Unprotected Intercourse among Young Black Men Who Have Sex with Men

Young Black men who have sex with men (YBMSM) are at extraordinarily high risk for HIV infection. Given their dual minority identity, they experience multiple forms of social oppression-racism, homophobia, and poverty. This study tested a model for how these forces contribute to their sexual risk behavior.

YBMSM (n = 1,289) from 2 Texas cities completed a 1-time assessment of sexual behaviors and psychosocial variables. Structural equation modeling was used to characterize relationships among variables.
  • Experiences of racism, homophobia, and socioeconomic distress were all associated with unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) either directly or indirectly in a manner largely consistent with Díaz's (1997, 1998) model of the effects of social oppression. 
  • Racism, homophobia, and socioeconomic distress were each associated with specific psychological vulnerabilities, which were in turn associated with participation in difficult sexual situations (e.g., in a public setting), and then UAI. 
  • The effects of racism were largely mediated by depressive symptoms and participation in difficult sexual situations. 
  • Homophobia was mediated by depressive symptoms, social support, and internalized homophobia. 
  • The effects of socioeconomic distress were partially mediated by decreased social support and greater participation in difficult sexual situations. 
  • Socioeconomic distress also had a significant direct effect on UAI not explained by the proposed mediators.
Social oppression contributes to YBMSM's psychological vulnerabilities, participation in difficult sexual situations, and their UAI. Interventions to reduce sexual risk in YBMSM should address socioeconomic disadvantage, homophobia, and racism, as well as the psychological challenges that social oppression creates for them.

Via:  http://goo.gl/S3c9dE Purchase full article at: http://goo.gl/xHjO51

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Utah.
  • 2Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California, San Francisco.
  • 3Department of Psychology, Georgia State University.
  • 4Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.