Wednesday, November 25, 2015

Involuntary Medication, Seclusion & Restraint in German Psychiatric Hospitals After the Adoption of Legislation in 2013

Background
Involuntary medication in psychiatric treatment of inpatients is highly controversial. While laws regulating involuntary medication have been changed in Germany, no data have been available to date on how often involuntary medication is actually applied. Recently, our hospital group introduced specific routine documentation of legal status and application of involuntary medication in the patients’ electronic records, which allows the assessment of the frequency of involuntary medication.

Method
For the year 2014, we extracted aggregated data from the electronic database on age, sex, psychiatric diagnosis, legal status during admission, kind of coercive measure (mechanical restraint, seclusion, and involuntary medication) applied, and the number and duration of seclusion and restraint episodes for seven study sites.

Results
A total of 1,514 (9.6%) of 15,832 admissions were involuntary. At least one coercive measure was applied in 976 (6.2%) admissions. Seclusion was applied in 579 (3.7%) admissions, mechanical restraint was applied in 529 (3.3%) admissions, and involuntary medication was applied in 78 (0.5%) admissions. Two-thirds of involuntary medications were applied in cases of emergency; the remainder was applied after a formal decision by a judge. In 55 (70.5%) of the admissions with involuntary medication, at least one other coercive measure (seclusion, restraint, or both) was applied as well.

Conclusion
Involuntary medication is rarely applied and less frequent than seclusion or mechanical restraint, possibly as a consequence of recent legal restrictions.

Table 2

Affected cases, number, and duration of coercive measures according to legal status.
Legal statusCoercive measurea
Totalb
SeclusionMechanical restraintInvoluntary medication as an emergency measureInvoluntary medication after judge’s decision
Voluntary (n = 14,318)263 (1.8%)228 (1.6%)12 (0.1%)0 (0.0%)455 (3.2%)
Detained according to mental health legislation (n = 1,026)187 (18.2%)220 (21.4%)31 (3.0%)17 (1.7%)347 (33.8%)
Detained according to guardianship legislation (n = 488)129 (26.4%)81 (16.6%)17 (3.5%)12 (2.5%)174 (35.7%)
Total (N = 15,832)579 (3.7%)529 (3.3%)60 (0.4%)29 (0.2%)976 (6.2%)
Number of coercive measures3,0161,9625,125
Duration (h; mean, SD)5.5 (7.9)8.1 (7.2)6.5 (7.7)
aAll percentages reflect the proportion of the row total.
bAdmissions who suffered more than one coercive measure are only totaled once.

Full article at:   http://goo.gl/1gSsW7

1Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy I, Centers for Psychiatry Suedwuerttemberg, Versorgungsforschung Weissenau, Ulm University, Ravensburg, Germany
Edited by: Samantha Battams, Torrens University Australia, Australia
Reviewed by: Matthias Jaeger, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zürich, Switzerland; Charles Bonsack, Université de Lausanne, Switzerland
*Correspondence: Erich Flammer,  ed.murtnez-pfz@remmalf.hcire
Specialty section: This article was submitted to Public Mental Health, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry




No comments:

Post a Comment