Monday, February 15, 2016

Are Adolescent Orphans More Likely to be HIV-Positive? A Pooled Data Analyses Across 19 Countries in Sub-Saharan Africa

BACKGROUND:
Despite extensive resources and numerous programmes directed towards orphans in sub-Saharan Africa, evidence of their disadvantage is surprisingly limited. While initial research suggests that orphans are at greater risk of being HIV-positive, the evidence is limited in geographic scope.

METHODS:
To rigorously test disparities in HIV prevalence related to orphanhood and parental HIV status in sub-Saharan Africa, we used Demographic and Health Survey data from 19 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. We conducted pooled multilevel logistic regression on adolescents aged 15-17 years with HIV test results (N=22 837 girls and 20 452 boys).

RESULTS:
Regardless of their gender, orphans who lost their mother, lost both parents or had an HIV-infected mother were two to three times more likely to test positive for HIV infection (ORs 1.87-3.17). The loss of a father was also associated with HIV infection risk for females, but of slightly lower magnitude (OR 1.63).

CONCLUSIONS:
To better inform interventions, future research is needed to quantify the relative contribution of perinatally-acquired and sexually-acquired infections, and to investigate the specific mechanisms that may account for disparities in the latter. In the meantime, programmes servingHIV-infect adults as well as those serving orphaned and vulnerable children should invest in family-based HIV testing in order to identify adolescents in need of treatment.

Purchase full article at:   http://goo.gl/3hx3pm

By:  Kidman R1Anglewicz P2.
  • 1Program in Public Health and Department of Family, Population & Preventative Medicine, Stony Brook University, Health Sciences Center, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
  • 2Department of Global Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. 
  •  2016 Feb 10. pii: jech-2015-206744. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-206744.



No comments:

Post a Comment