Using the
structural-environmental conceptual framework, this study employed mixed
methods to address the question of whether sex with female sex workers
contributes to HIV risk among male immigrant Latino day laborers in suburban Maryland.
Because contextual factors can greatly affect HIV risk for both sex workers and
their clients, this study investigated the organizational structure of sex
work, factors that predicted men’s hiring of sex workers, sexual behaviors
performed with sex workers, and the use of condoms.
Qualitative research was
conducted to inform the development of a quantitative survey, but also provided
crucial descriptions about the motivations, locations, arrangements, and sexual
activities related to sex work. Key informant interviews (N= 10), in-depth interviews with day laborers (N= 10) and Latina female sex workers (N =
4), and two focus groups with day laborers (N= 11) were conducted, and a quantitative survey administered
via Audio-enhanced Computer-assisted Self-interviewing (N =
174).
Condom use was nearly universal in encounters with female sex workers,
thus indicating that the sex workers were not an important source of HIV
transmission in this context. Logistic regression was performed to test a model
predicting sex with sex workers. Latino day laborers who reported more
immigrant stress and who did not have a partner in the U.S. were more likely to
have had sex with a sex worker, as were men who reported binge drinking.
Structural and social conditions influenced the hiring of sex workers.
Further
research is warranted to better understand the interrelationships among these
circumstances and to inform the development of programs to address them.
Percent | |
---|---|
Ways men find sex workers (N= 174) | |
Sex workers give out business cards | 59.2 |
Friends tell each other | 50.6 |
Pimp approaches potential clients | 33.3 |
Internet | 18.4 |
Sex workers are in public places (e.g., street corner) | 14.9 |
Locations where men have sex with sex workers (N= 174) | |
House or apartment (“delivery”) | 58.1 |
Brothel (“casa de sitas”) | 36.8 |
Hotel or motel | 28.7 |
Street, car, or park | 19.0 |
Bar, discotheque, restaurant | 16.7 |
Reasons participants had sex with sex workers (N= 52) | |
Lack of companionship | 65.4 |
Relief from sexual urges | 55.8 |
No commitment | 51.9 |
Only sex available | 40.4 |
Fun and pleasure | 36.5 |
Distraction from problems | 17.3 |
Sexual behaviors participants performed with sex workers (N= 52) | |
Vaginal intercourse | 76.9 |
Oral sex on the participant | 59.6 |
Manual stimulation of penis | 34.6 |
Anal intercourse | 9.6 |
Oral sex on the woman | 3.9 |
Note: Participants could select more than one response option
Full article at: http://goo.gl/YzCU35
By: Fernanda T. Bianchi, Carol A. Reisen, Felisa A. Gonzales, Juan C. Arroyo, Maria Cecilia Zea, and Paul J. Poppen
Department of
Psychology, George Washington University, 2125 G St. NW, Washington, DC 20052,
USA
Corresponding
author.
Fernanda
T. Bianchi: ude.uwg@ihcnaibf
More at: https://twitter.com/hiv insight
No comments:
Post a Comment