We estimated the frequency and examined the characteristics of intimate partner homicide and related deaths in 16 US states participating in the National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS), a state-based surveillance system.
We used a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods to analyze NVDRS data from 2003 to 2009. We selected deaths linked to intimate partner violence for analysis.
Our sample comprised 4470 persons who died in the course of 3350 intimate partner violence–related homicide incidents. Intimate partners and corollary victims represented 80% and 20% of homicide victims, respectively. Corollary homicide victims included family members, new intimate partners, friends, acquaintances, police officers, and strangers.
Our findings, from the first multiple-state study of intimate partner homicide and corollary homicides, demonstrate that the burden of intimate partner violence extends beyond the couple involved. Systems (e.g., criminal justice, medical care, and shelters) whose representatives routinely interact with victims of intimate partner violence can help assess the potential for lethal danger, which may prevent intimate partner and corollary victims from harm.
Below: Age distribution of corollary homicide victims and intimate partner homicide victims
Below: Characterization of homicide victims among (a) all homicide victims (n = 3619) by intimate partner and corollary victims and (b) corollary homicide victims by relationship: National Violent Death Reporting System, United States, 2003–2009.
Full article at: http://goo.gl/O7EjqB
At the time of the study, the authors were with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Correspondence should be sent to Sharon G. Smith, PhD, Division of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy, NE, MS F-64, Atlanta, GA 30341 (e-mail: vog.cdc@4htimss). Reprints can be ordered at http://www.ajph.org by clicking the “Reprints” link.
Note. The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
S. G. Smith conceptualized the study, conducted analyses, and led the writing. K. A. Fowler and P. H. Niolon assisted with analyses, contributed to the writing and editing of article drafts, and approved the final version.
More at: https://twitter.com/hiv insight