Showing posts with label gonorrhea. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gonorrhea. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 6, 2016

Prevalence & Risk Factors of Three Curable Sexually Transmitted Infections among Women in Nairobi, Kenya

BACKGROUND:
Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are a major public health problem, especially in developing countries. The complications of untreated STIs in the female genital tract and their role in adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes have been well documented. The prevalence of STIs in Kenya among women in the general population has not been extensively studied and there is a lack of guidelines for screening of non-pregnant women. Knowledge of the prevalence of curable STIs among this population can provide a basis for integrating STI screening in family planning clinics.

METHODS:
A cross-sectional study was conducted between May and September 2013 at the family planning (FP) clinic at Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH) in Nairobi, Kenya. A total of 261 participants aged 18-49 years were enrolled; with data from 249 participants being analysed. An interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to gather socio-demographic data and assess for risk factors. Each participant was screened for Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) by wet mount microscopy; Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) by culture and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) by PCR.

RESULTS:
The prevalence of CT was 13 % (33/249), TV 0.4 % (1/249) and GC 0 % (0/249). All the infected women reported having had only one sexual partner in the previous 1 year. The age group prevalence for CT was highest in the 25-29 years age group (21 %). The syndromic approach to the management of STIs showed a low specificity (vaginal discharge, 65.7 %; lower abdominal pain, 60.6 %) and positive predictive value (vaginal discharge, 14 %; lower abdominal pain, 11.5 %) for the two commonly used symptoms when compared to the gold standard of CT PCR.

CONCLUSION:
A high prevalence of CT was identified among women attending the FP Clinic at KNH. The study reinforces the need to implement regular screening for STIs among FP clinic attendants. It also reveals the need to review the usage of the syndromic approach for the management of STIs.

Characteristics of CT positive participants
CharacteristicsChlamydia infections/nPrevalence (%)P value
Age group
 <251/138
 25–296/2821
 30–346/5611
 35–3910/6715
 40–448/4817
 45–492/375
Marital status
 Married29/211140.59
 Not married4/3811
Education level
 Primary and below11/67160.37
 Above primary22/18212
Occupation
 Paid employment11/83130.9
 Self employed16/12713
 Unemployed6/3915
Coitarche
 ≤20 years21/160130.95
 >20 years10/7813
Treated STIs
 No32/224140.22
 Yes1/254

Full article at:   http://goo.gl/zLt0e0

By:  Maina AN1Kimani J2Anzala O3.
  • 1Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Nairobi, P.O BOX 19676-00202, Nairobi, Kenya. acnmaina@yahoo.com.
  • 2Kenya AIDS Control Project, University of Manitoba/Nairobi Collaborative Research Group, P.O BOX 19676-00202, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • 3KAVI Institute of Clinical Research, University of Nairobi, P.O BOX 19676-00202, Nairobi, Kenya.
  •  2016 Mar 29;9(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-1990-x. 



Friday, March 18, 2016

Screening for Asymptomatic Gonorrhea and Chlamydia in the Pediatric Emergency Department

BACKGROUND:
Because adolescents rely heavily on emergency services for health care, a pediatric emergency department (PED) visit may be their only opportunity for sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening. The primary objectives of this study were to determine the proportion of Neisseria gonorrheae (GC) and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infections in asymptomatic PED adolescents and patient-perceived barriers to STI screening.

METHODS:
A convenience sample of patients aged 14 to 21 years presenting to an urban PED with nongenitourinary complaints was offered screening for GC and CT. Regardless of declining or accepting screening, all were asked to complete a questionnaire designed to identify barriers to screening.

RESULTS:
Sixty-eight percent of those approached participated (n = 719). Those who agreed to STI screening were more likely to be nonwhite (61.4% vs. 38.6%, P = 0.001) and publically insured (63.3%) versus privately insured (29.3%) or no insurance (7.58%). Four hundred three (56%) participants provided urine samples, and of those, 40 (9.9%) were positive for an STI. Controlling for other demographics, race was a significant predictor, with the odds of testing positive for nonwhite participants 5.90 times that of white participants. Patients who refused testing were more likely to report not engaging in sexual activity (54.3% vs. 42.4%, P = 0.009) and less likely to perceive that they were at risk for STIs.

CONCLUSIONS:
There are high proportions of GC and CT among asymptomatic adolescents visiting an academic urban PED. A universal PED STI screening program may be an important component of STI reduction initiatives, especially among adolescents who do not perceive that they are at risk and may not receive testing elsewhere.

Purchase full article at:   http://goo.gl/X4xKlt

  • 1From the*Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH; and †Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, University of Minnesota Children's Hospital, Minneapolis, MN. 
  •  2016 Apr;43(4):209-15. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000424.



Thursday, March 17, 2016

HIV Incidence among Men Who Have Sex with Men After Diagnosis with Sexually Transmitted Infections

BACKGROUND:
Men who have sex with men (MSM) are at high risk for acquiring HIV infection after diagnosis with other sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Identifying the STIs associated with the greatest risk of subsequent HIV infection could help target prevention interventions, particularly preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP).

METHODS:
Using matched HIV and STI surveillance data from Washington State from January 1, 2007, to June 30, 2013, we calculated the incidence of new HIV diagnoses after different STI diagnoses among MSM. Men entered observation at the time of their first STI diagnosis during the study period and exited at HIV diagnosis or June 30, 2013. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to conduct a global comparison of rates.

RESULTS:
From January 1, 2007, to June 30, 2013, 6577 HIV-negative MSM were diagnosed as having 10,080 bacterial STIs at 8371 unique time points and followed for 17,419 person-years. Two hundred eighty (4.3%) men were subsequently diagnosed as having HIV infection for an overall incidence of 1.6 per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval, 1.4-1.8). The estimated incidence of HIV diagnoses among all MSM in the state was 0.4 per 100 person-years. Men who have sex with men were at the greatest risk for HIV diagnosis after being diagnosed as having rectal gonorrhea (HIV incidence, 4.1 per 100 person-years), followed by early syphilis (2.8), urethral gonorrhea (1.6), rectal chlamydial infection (1.6), pharyngeal gonorrhea (1.1), late syphilis (1.0), and urethral chlamydial infection (0.6; P < 0.0001 overall).

CONCLUSIONS:
Men who have sex with men diagnosed as having rectal gonorrhea and early syphilis were at the greatest risk for being diagnosed as having HIV infection after STI diagnosis. These men should be prioritized for more intensive prevention interventions, including PrEP.

Below:  Cumulative hazard of HIV diagnosis following bacterial STIs (STI) GC = gonorrhea. CT = chlamydial infection



Below:  Percent of 736 MSM newly diagnosed as having HIV infection from July 2011 to June 2013 with a reported STI diagnosis in the 2 years before HIV diagnosis GC indicates gonorrhea; CT, chlamydial infection.



Full article at:   http://goo.gl/N3Kb5L

  • 1From the Departments of *Medicine and †Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; ‡HIV/STD Program, Public Health-Seattle & King County, Seattle, WA; and §Infectious Disease Assessment Unit, Washington State Department of Health, Olympia, WA. 
  •  2016 Apr;43(4):249-54. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000423.



Monday, March 14, 2016

Prevalence of HIV, Sexually Transmitted Infections, and Risk Behaviours among Female Sex Workers in Nairobi, Kenya: Results of a Respondent Driven Sampling Study

We conducted a respondent driven sampling survey to estimate HIV prevalence and risk behavior among female sex workers (FSWs) in Nairobi, Kenya. 

Women aged 18 years and older who reported selling sex to a man at least once in the past 3 months were eligible to participate. Consenting FSWs completed a behavioral questionnaire and were tested for HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Adjusted population-based prevalence and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using RDS analysis tool. Factors significantly associated with HIV infection were assessed using log-binomial regression analysis. 

A total of 596 eligible participants were included in the analysis. Overall HIV prevalence was 29.5 % (95 % CI 24.7–34.9). Median age was 30 years (IQR 25–38 years); median duration of sex work was 12 years (IQR 8–17 years). The most frequent client-seeking venues were bars (76.6 %) and roadsides (29.3 %). The median number of clients per week was seven (IQR 4–18 clients). HIV testing was high with 86.6 % reported ever been tested for HIV and, of these, 63.1 % testing within the past 12 months. Of all women, 59.7 % perceived themselves at ‘great risk’ for HIV infection. Of HIV-positive women, 51.0 % were aware of their infection. In multivariable analysis, increasing age, inconsistent condom use with paying clients, and use of a male condom as a method of contraception were independently associated with unrecognized HIV infection. Prevalence among STIs was low, ranging from 0.9 % for syphilis, 1.1 % for gonorrhea, and 3.1 % for Chlamydia. 

The data suggest high prevalence of HIV among FSWs in Nairobi. Targeted and routine HIV and STI combination prevention strategies need to be scaled up or established to meet the needs of this population.

Below:  Respondent driven sampling recruitment profile of female sex workers by Constituency Nairobi, Kenya, 2010


Bivariate and multivariable log-binomial analysis of predictors of unrecognized HIV infection among female sex workers, Nairobi, Kenya, 2010 (N = 480)
VariableUnadjusted RR (95 % CI)p valueAdjusted RR (95 % CI)ap value
Age group (years)
 18–24ReferentReferent
 25–291.6 (0.9, 3.1).12871.5 (0.8, 2.9).1808
 30–342.9 (1.6, 5.2).00052.4 (1.3, 4.3).0030
 35–622.3 (1.3, 4.1).00452.1 (1.2, 3.7).0124
Marital status
 Never marriedReferent
 Previously married0.9 (0.6, 1.3).4210
 Currently married1.3 (0.3, 6.4).7720
Education
 None/incomplete primaryReferent
 Completed primary0.5 (0.3, 0.8).0088
 Incomplete secondary0.8 (0.5, 1.5).5638
 Completed secondary+0.7 (0.4, 1.3).2301
Duration of sex work (years)
 4–9Referent
 10–141.0 (0.6, 1.7).9705
 15–451.3 (0.9, 2.1).1997
Sex as a main source of income
 NoReferent
 Yes0.8 (0.5, 1.4).4880
Client-seeking locationsb,d
 Bar1.0 (0.6, 1.5).8992
 Roadside0.7 (0.4, 1.1).1448
 At home1.8 (1.0, 2.9).0299
 Rented stall or shed1.2 (0.67, 2.1).5430
 Clients called participant1.3 (0.8, 2.0).3165
 Other locations0.8 (0.4, 1.9).6605
Number of paying partners (past 7 days)
 0–10Referent
 11–200.9 (0.5, 1.6).7278
 21–300.6 (0.3, 1.2).1514
 31+0.2 (0.02, 1.5).1119
Consistent condom use with paying partners (past 30 days)
 AlwaysReferentReferent
 Sometimes/never1.9 (1.3, 2.8).00152.1 (1.4, 3.0).0001
Condom use with last paying partner
 YesReferent
 No0.8 (0.4, 1.4).3788
Number of non-paying sex partner(s) (past 30 days)
 NoneReferent
 10.6 (0.4, 1.0).0613
 2+1.0 (0.6, 1.8).9442
Consistent condom use with nonpaying partner(s) (past 30 days)
 AlwaysReferent
 Sometimes/Never0.7 (0.4, 1.1).1380
Condom use with last nonpaying partner
 YesReferent
 No0.5 (0.2, 0.9).0287
Drug use (past 12 months)c,d
 Marijuana/bhang0.8 (0.5, 1.2).1981
 Khat/miraa0.8 (0.6, 1.3).3871
 Heroin1.3 (0.2, 6.8).7721
 Injection drug use1.2 (0.2, 5.9).8899
Alcohol consumption
 NeverReferent
 Once a month or less1.9 (0.9, 3.9).0973
 2–4 times a month1.1 (0.4, 2.5).8879
 2–3 times a week1.3 (0.7, 2.4).4658
 4 or more times a week1.3 (0.7, 2.4).4037
Contraception method (past 30 days)c
 Any contraception used1.2 (0.8, 1.9).4328
 Injection0.8 (0.5, 1.3).3901
 Male condom2.3 (1.6, 3.3)<.00012.5 (1.7, 3.5)<.0001
 Implant0.5 (0.1, 0.9).0322
 Pill0.3 (0.1, 1.0).0510
 Female condom0.5 (0.1, 1.8).2686
Practice douching
 NoReferent
 Yes1.1 (0.9, 1.2).1315
aAdjusted for all variables or individual categories within variables that were found to be significant at p ≤ .20 or lower in bivariate analysis. Variables found to be significant at the p ≤ .05 are displayed
bRespondents could have selected several client-seeking locations
cRespondents could have used selected several drugs in the past 12 months
dReferent group for multi-response variables were women who did not report the response

Full article at:   http://goo.gl/lCBqtV

Helgar Musyoki, National AIDS and Sexually Transmitted Infection Control Programme, Ministry of Health, P.O. Box 19361-00202, Nairobi, Kenya;